Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 2/2017

01-06-2017

Relation between one- and two-dimensional noise power spectra of magnetic resonance images

Authors: Yuki Ichinoseki, Yoshio Machida

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to elucidate the relation between the one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) noise power spectra (NPSs) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We measured the 1D NPSs using the slit method and the radial frequency method. In the slit method, numerical slits 1 pixel wide and L pixels long were placed on a noise image (128 × 128 pixels) and scanned in the MR image domain. We obtained the 1D NPS using the slit method (1D NPS_Slit) and the 2D NPS of the noise region scanned by the slit (2D NPS_Slit). We also obtained 1D NPS using the radial frequency method (1D NPS_Radial) by averaging the NPS values on the circumference of a circle centered at the origin of the original 2D NPS. The properties of the 1D NPS_Slits varied with L and the scanning direction in PROPELLER MRI. The 2D NPS_Slit shapes matched that of the original 2D NPS, but were compressed by L/128. The central line profiles of the 2D NPS_Slits and the 1D NPS_Slits matched exactly. Therefore, the 1D NPS_Slits reflected not only the NPS values on the central axis of the original 2D NPS, but also the NPS values around the central axis. Moreover, the measurement precisions of the 1D NPS_Slits were lower than those of the 1D NPS_Radial. Consequently, it is necessary to select the approach applied for 1D NPS measurements according to the data acquisition method and the purpose of the noise evaluation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hsieh J. Key performance parameters of the CT scanner. In: Hsieh J, editor. Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2009. p. 170–2. Hsieh J. Key performance parameters of the CT scanner. In: Hsieh J, editor. Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2009. p. 170–2.
2.
go back to reference Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CE. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum. Med Phys. 1984;11:797–805.CrossRefPubMed Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CE. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum. Med Phys. 1984;11:797–805.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Giger ML, Doi K, Fujita H. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 7. Noise Wiener spectra of II-TV digital imaging systems. Med Phys. 1986;13:131–8.CrossRefPubMed Giger ML, Doi K, Fujita H. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 7. Noise Wiener spectra of II-TV digital imaging systems. Med Phys. 1986;13:131–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dobbins JT III, Ergun DL, Rutz LJ, Hinshaw DA, Blume H, Clark DC. DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. Med Phys. 1995;22:1581–93.CrossRefPubMed Dobbins JT III, Ergun DL, Rutz LJ, Hinshaw DA, Blume H, Clark DC. DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. Med Phys. 1995;22:1581–93.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Siewerdsen JH, Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, Yorkston J, Huang W. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. Med Phys. 1998;25:614–28.CrossRefPubMed Siewerdsen JH, Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, Yorkston J, Huang W. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. Med Phys. 1998;25:614–28.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Samei E, Flynn MJ. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Med Phys. 2003;30:608–22.CrossRefPubMed Samei E, Flynn MJ. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Med Phys. 2003;30:608–22.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Samei E. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors. Med Phys. 2003;30:1747–57.CrossRefPubMed Samei E. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors. Med Phys. 2003;30:1747–57.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Riederer SJ, Pelc NJ, Chesler DA. The noise power spectrum in computed X-ray tomography. Phys Med Biol. 1978;23:446–54.CrossRefPubMed Riederer SJ, Pelc NJ, Chesler DA. The noise power spectrum in computed X-ray tomography. Phys Med Biol. 1978;23:446–54.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Boedeker KL, Cooper VN, McNitt-Gray MF. Application of the noise power spectrum in modern diagnostic MDCT: part I. Measurement of noise power spectra and noise equivalent quanta. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:4027–46.CrossRefPubMed Boedeker KL, Cooper VN, McNitt-Gray MF. Application of the noise power spectrum in modern diagnostic MDCT: part I. Measurement of noise power spectra and noise equivalent quanta. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:4027–46.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pipe JG. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:963–9.CrossRefPubMed Pipe JG. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:963–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ichinoseki Y, Nagasaka T, Miyamoto K, Tamura H, Mori I, Machida Y. Noise power spectrum in PROPELLER MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2015;14:235–42.CrossRefPubMed Ichinoseki Y, Nagasaka T, Miyamoto K, Tamura H, Mori I, Machida Y. Noise power spectrum in PROPELLER MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2015;14:235–42.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dobbins JT III, Samei E, Ranger NT, Chen Y. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. Med Phys. 2006;33:1466–75.CrossRefPubMed Dobbins JT III, Samei E, Ranger NT, Chen Y. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. Med Phys. 2006;33:1466–75.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ichikawa K, Hara T, Niwa S, Yamaguchi I, Ohashi K. Calculation methods for noise power spectrum measurement in computed tomography. Iyo Gazo Joho Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;25:29–34 (in Japanese). Ichikawa K, Hara T, Niwa S, Yamaguchi I, Ohashi K. Calculation methods for noise power spectrum measurement in computed tomography. Iyo Gazo Joho Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;25:29–34 (in Japanese).
18.
go back to reference Goto M, Sato K, Minakuchi S, Miura T, Osanai M, Machida Y, Mori I. Noise analysis of CT image: improvement in low-frequency area. Bull Sch Health Sci Tohoku Univ. 2011;20:55–61 (in Japanese). Goto M, Sato K, Minakuchi S, Miura T, Osanai M, Machida Y, Mori I. Noise analysis of CT image: improvement in low-frequency area. Bull Sch Health Sci Tohoku Univ. 2011;20:55–61 (in Japanese).
19.
go back to reference Miyati T, Fujita H, Kasuga T, Koshida K, Sanada S, Banno T, Mase M, Yamada K. Measurements of MTF and SNR (f) using a subtraction method in MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:2961–72.CrossRefPubMed Miyati T, Fujita H, Kasuga T, Koshida K, Sanada S, Banno T, Mase M, Yamada K. Measurements of MTF and SNR (f) using a subtraction method in MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:2961–72.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ichinoseki Y, Miyamoto K, Saito T, Mori I, Machida Y. One-dimensional noise power spectrum measurement in PROPELLER MR imaging. Med Imaging Technol. 2015;33:217–22 (in Japanese). Ichinoseki Y, Miyamoto K, Saito T, Mori I, Machida Y. One-dimensional noise power spectrum measurement in PROPELLER MR imaging. Med Imaging Technol. 2015;33:217–22 (in Japanese).
21.
go back to reference Price RR, Axel L, Morgen T, Newman R, Perman W, Schneiders N, Wood M, Thomas SR. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys. 1990;17:287–95.CrossRefPubMed Price RR, Axel L, Morgen T, Newman R, Perman W, Schneiders N, Wood M, Thomas SR. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys. 1990;17:287–95.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). The Association of Electrical Equipment and Medical Imaging Manufacturers: determination of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging. NEMA Standards Publication MS1-2008 (R2014). 2014. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). The Association of Electrical Equipment and Medical Imaging Manufacturers: determination of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging. NEMA Standards Publication MS1-2008 (R2014). 2014.
24.
go back to reference King KF. Gridding reconstruction. In: Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ, editors. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 507. King KF. Gridding reconstruction. In: Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ, editors. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 507.
25.
go back to reference Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitively encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:952–62.CrossRefPubMed Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitively encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:952–62.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Relation between one- and two-dimensional noise power spectra of magnetic resonance images
Authors
Yuki Ichinoseki
Yoshio Machida
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-016-0380-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Radiological Physics and Technology 2/2017 Go to the issue