Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

Related factors and use of free preventive health services among adults with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan

Authors: Suh-May Yen, Pei-Tseng Kung, Li-Ting Chiu, Wen-Chen Tsai

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the utilization of preventive health services in the adults with intellectual disabilities from the nationwide database.

Methods

The research method of this study is secondary data analysis. The data was obtained from three nationwide databases from 2006 to 2008. This study employed descriptive statistics to analyze the use and rate of preventive health services by intellectual disabled adults. Chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between the utilization of preventive health services and these variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the factors that affect intellectual disabled adults’ use of preventive health services.

Results

Our findings indicated 16.65% of people with intellectual disabilities aged over 40 years used the preventive health services. Females were more frequent users than males (18.27% vs. 15.21%, p <0.001). The utilization rate decreased with increasing severity of intellectual disabilities. The utilization was lowest (13.83%) for those with very severe disability, whereas that was the highest (19.38%) for those with mild severity. The factors significantly influencing utilization of the services included gender, age, and marital status, urbanization of resident areas, monthly payroll, low-income household status, catastrophic illnesses status and relevant chronic diseases and severity of disability.

Conclusions

Although Taiwan’s Health Promotion Administration (HPA) has provided free preventive health services for more than 15 years, people with intellectual disabilities using preventive health care tend to be low. Demographics, economic conditions, health status, relevant chronic diseases, environmental factor, and severity of disability are the main factors influencing the use of preventive healthcare. According to the present findings, it is recommended that the government should increase the reimbursement of the medical staff performing health examinations for the persons with intellectual disabilities. It is also suggested to conduct media publicity and education to the public and the nursing facilities for the utilization of adult preventive health services.
Literature
1.
Maulik PK, Mascarenhas MN, Mathers CD, Dua T, Saxena S: Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2011, 32 (2): 419-436. 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018.PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
Wang YT: Are adults with intellectual disabilities socially excluded? An exploratory study in Taiwan. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013, 57 (10): 893-902. 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01574.x.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Durvasula S, Beange H, Baker W: Mortality of people with intellectual disability in northern Sydney. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2002, 27 (4): 255-264. 10.1080/1366825021000029311.CrossRef
5.
Patja K, Iivanainen M, Vesala H, Oksanen H, Ruoppila I: Life expectancy of people with intellectual disability: a 35-year follow-up study. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2000, 44 (Pt 5): 591-599.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Tyrer F, McGrother C: Cause-specific mortality and death certificate reporting in adults with moderate to profound intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009, 53 (11): 898-904. 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01201.x.PubMedCrossRef
7.
van Schrojenstein Lantman-De HM, Metsemakers JF, Haveman MJ, Crebolder HF: Health problems in people with intellectual disability in general practice: a comparative study. Fam Pract. 2000, 17 (5): 405-407. 10.1093/fampra/17.5.405.CrossRef
8.
Kwok H, Cheung PWH: Co-morbidity of psychiatric disorder and medical illness in people with intellectual disabilities. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007, 20 (5): 443-449. 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3282ab9941.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Lin JD, Yen CF, Loh CH, Hsu SW, Huang HC, Tang CC, Li CW, Wu JL: A cross-sectional study of the characteristics and determinants of emergency care utilization among people with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan. Res Dev Disabil. 2006, 27 (6): 657-667. 10.1016/j.ridd.2005.09.001.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Rimmer JH, Yamaki K, Lowry BMD, Wang E, Vogel LC: Obesity and obesity-related secondary conditions in adolescents with intellectual/developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010, 54 (9): 787-794. 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01305.x.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Sohler N, Lubetkin E, Levy J, Soghomonian C, Rimmerman A: Factors associated with obesity and coronary heart disease in people with intellectual disabilities. Soc Work Health Care. 2009, 48 (1): 76-89. 10.1080/00981380802451160.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Diab ME, Johnston MV: Relationships between level of disability and receipt of preventive health services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004, 85 (5): 749-757. 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.028.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Lin JD, Yen CF, Wu JL: Importance and satisfaction of preventive health strategies in institutions for people with intellectual disabilities: a perspective of institutional directors. Res Dev Disabil. 2005, 26 (3): 267-280. 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.001.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Weng RH, Kung PT, Tsai WC, Chiang HH, Chiu LT: The use of fluoride varnish and its determining factors among children with disability in Taiwan. Res Dev Disabil. 2011, 32 (2): 583-592. 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.016.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Harris-David L, O'Day B: Use of screening and preventive services among women with disabilities. Am J Med Qual. 2001, 16 (4): 135-144. 10.1177/106286060101600405.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Phillips KA, Mayer ML, Aday LA: Barriers to care among racial/ethnic groups under managed care. Health Aff. 2000, 19 (4): 65-75. 10.1377/hlthaff.19.4.65.CrossRef
17.
Ramirez A, Farmer GC, Grant D, Papachristou T: Disability and preventive cancer screening: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health. 2005, 95 (11): 2057-2064. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066118.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Shabas D, Weinreb H: Preventive healthcare in women with multiple sclerosis. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000, 9 (4): 389-395. 10.1089/15246090050020709.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Pearson V, Davis C, Ruoff C, Dyer J: Only one quarter of women with learning disability in Exeter have cervical screening. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed). 1998, 316 (7149): 1979.CrossRef
20.
Perry J, Kerr M, Felce D, Bartley S, Tomlinson J: Monitoring the public health impact of health checks for adults with a learning disability in Wales: Final report of the Public Health Wales/WCLD project group. 2010, Cardiff: Public Health Wales & Welsh Centre for Learning Disabilities
21.
Lennox N, Bain C, Rey-Conde T, Purdie D, Bush R, Pandeya N: Effects of a comprehensive health assessment programme for Australian adults with intellectual disability: a cluster randomized trial. Int J Epidemiol. 2007, 36 (1): 139-146. 10.1093/ije/dyl254.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Flottemesch TJ, Edwards NM, Solberg LI: Greater use of preventive services in U.S. health care could save lives at little or no cost. Health Aff. 2010, 29 (9): 1656-1660. 10.1377/hlthaff.2008.0701.CrossRef
23.
Gandjour A: Aging diseases–do they prevent preventive health care from saving costs?. Health Econ. 2009, 18 (3): 355-362. 10.1002/hec.1370.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Macnab AJ, Rozmus J, Benton D, Gagnon FA: 3-year results of a collaborative school-based oral health program in a remote First Nations community. Rural Remote Health. 2008, 8 (2): 882.PubMed
25.
Malach M, Baumol WJ: Opportunities for the cost reduction of medical care. J Community Health. 2009, 34 (4): 255-261. 10.1007/s10900-009-9155-7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Rodriguez Vazquez C, Garcillan R, Rioboo R, Bratos E: Prevalence of dental caries in an adult population with mental disabilities in Spain. Spec Care Dentist. 2002, 22 (2): 65-69. 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2002.tb01164.x.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Kung PT, Tsai WC, Li YH: Determining factors for utilization of preventive health services among adults with disabilities in Taiwan. Res Dev Disabil. 2012, 33 (1): 205-213. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.006.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Huang KH, Tsai WC, Kung PT: The use of Pap smear and its influencing factors among women with disabilities in Taiwan. Res Dev Disabil. 2012, 33 (2): 307-314. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.016.PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, Callahan EJ, Robbins JA: Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract. 2000, 49 (2): 147-152.PubMed
31.
Green CA, Pope CR: Gender, psychosocial factors and the use of medical services: a longitudinal analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1999, 48 (10): 1363-1372. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00440-7.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Owens GM: Gender differences in health care expenditures, resource utilization, and quality of care. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008, 14 (3 Suppl): 2-6.PubMed
33.
Haveman M, Perry J, Salvador-Carulla L, Walsh PN, Kerr M, Van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk H, Van Hove G, Berger DM, Azema B, Buono S, Cara AC, Germanavicius A, Linehan C, Ma¨a¨tta¨ T, Tossebro J, Weber G: Ageing and health status in adults with intellectual disabilities: results of the European POMONA II study. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011, 36 (1): 49-60. 10.3109/13668250.2010.549464.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Hewitt M, Devesa SS, Breen N: Cervical cancer screening among U.S. women: analyses of the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med. 2004, 39 (2): 270-278. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.035.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Katz SJ, Hofer TP: Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage: breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States. JAMA. 1994, 272 (7): 530-534. 10.1001/jama.1994.03520070050037.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Rodriguez MA, Ward LM, Perez-Stable EJ: Breast and cervical cancer screening: impact of health insurance status, ethnicity, and nativity of Latinas. Ann Fam Med. 2005, 3 (3): 235-241. 10.1370/afm.291.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Kung PT, Tsai WC, Chiou SJ: The assessment of the likelihood of mammography usage with relevant factors among women with disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2012, 33 (1): 136-143. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.032.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Related factors and use of free preventive health services among adults with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan
Authors
Suh-May Yen
Pei-Tseng Kung
Li-Ting Chiu
Wen-Chen Tsai
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-248

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Health Services Research 1/2014 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Social networks of health care providers and patients in cardiovascular risk management: a study protocol

Research article

An exploration of how nurse prescribing is being used for patients with respiratory conditions across the east of England

Research article

Patient satisfaction with HIV and TB treatment in a public programme in rural KwaZulu-Natal: evidence from patient-exit interviews

Research article

The effect of hospital mergers on long-term sickness absence among hospital employees: a fixed effects multivariate regression analysis using panel data

Research article

How do patients with severe mental diagnosis cope in everyday life - a qualitative study comparing patients’ experiences of self-referral inpatient treatment with treatment as usual?

Research article

The development and evaluation of a five-language multi-perspective standardised measure: clinical decision-making involvement and satisfaction (CDIS)