Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2013

01-06-2013 | Original Article

Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence: What is the influence of anal sphincter lesions?

Authors: F. Pucciani, M. Raggioli, R. Gattai

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of rehabilitative treatment of incontinent patients with anal sphincter lesions in order to verify whether these lesions influence the outcome of rehabilitation.

Methods

Between January 2008 and June 2011, 48 patients [36 women, age range 51–77 years; 12 men, age range 57–70 years] affected by fecal incontinence were included in the study. After a preliminary clinical evaluation, including the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score, all patients were studied by means of endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry. Two patients groups were identified: Group 1 comprised 27 patients with sphincter lesions and Group 2 had 21 patients without sphincter lesions. All 48 underwent a multimodal rehabilitation program. At the end of the rehabilitation program, all patients were reassessed by means of clinical evaluation and anorectal manometry and their data were analyzed.

Results

Although we obtained an overall significantly lower FISI score in all patients after rehabilitation (p < 0.001) when compared with pre-treatment values, our study revealed that patients with sphincter lesions had a significantly worse post-rehabilitative FISI score (p < 0.003) when compared with those patients with intact anal sphincters and that there is a linear relationship between post-rehabilitative FISI scores and severity of sphincter lesions (ρ s 0.69).

Conclusions

These data suggest that rehabilitation may be less effective in patients affected by sphincter defects.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deutekom M, Terra MP, Dobben AC et al (2005) Impact of faecal incontinence severity on health domains. Colorectal Dis 7:263–269PubMedCrossRef Deutekom M, Terra MP, Dobben AC et al (2005) Impact of faecal incontinence severity on health domains. Colorectal Dis 7:263–269PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG, Lowry AC (2004) Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364:621–632PubMedCrossRef Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG, Lowry AC (2004) Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364:621–632PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Norton C, Kamm MA (2001) Anal sphincter biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for faecal incontinence in adults: a systematic review. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 15:1147–1154PubMedCrossRef Norton C, Kamm MA (2001) Anal sphincter biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for faecal incontinence in adults: a systematic review. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 15:1147–1154PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bharucha AE (2011) Recent advances in functional anorectal disorders. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13:316–322PubMedCrossRef Bharucha AE (2011) Recent advances in functional anorectal disorders. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13:316–322PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Enck P (1993) Biofeedback training in disordered defecation. A critical review. Dig Dis Sci 38:1953–1960PubMedCrossRef Enck P (1993) Biofeedback training in disordered defecation. A critical review. Dig Dis Sci 38:1953–1960PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bartlett L, Sloots K, Nowak M, Ho YH (2011) Biofeedback for fecal incontinence: a randomized study comparing exercise regimens. Dis Colon Rectum 54:846–856PubMedCrossRef Bartlett L, Sloots K, Nowak M, Ho YH (2011) Biofeedback for fecal incontinence: a randomized study comparing exercise regimens. Dis Colon Rectum 54:846–856PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Terra MP, Deutekom M, Dobben AC et al (2008) Can the outcome of pelvic floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence be predicted? Int J Colorectal Dis 23:503–511PubMedCrossRef Terra MP, Deutekom M, Dobben AC et al (2008) Can the outcome of pelvic floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence be predicted? Int J Colorectal Dis 23:503–511PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Rieger NA, Wattchow DA, Sarre RG et al (1997) Prospective trial of pelvic floor retraining in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 40:821–826PubMedCrossRef Rieger NA, Wattchow DA, Sarre RG et al (1997) Prospective trial of pelvic floor retraining in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 40:821–826PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Leroi AM, Dorival MP, Lecouturier MF et al (1999) Pudendal neuropathy and severity of incontinence but not presence of an anal sphincter defect may determine the response to biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 42:762–769PubMedCrossRef Leroi AM, Dorival MP, Lecouturier MF et al (1999) Pudendal neuropathy and severity of incontinence but not presence of an anal sphincter defect may determine the response to biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 42:762–769PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pucciani F, Iozzi L, Masi A, Cianchi F, Cortesini C (2003) Multimodal rehabilitation of faecal incontinence: experience of an Italian centre devoted to faecal disorder rehabilitation. Tech Coloproctol 7:139–147PubMedCrossRef Pucciani F, Iozzi L, Masi A, Cianchi F, Cortesini C (2003) Multimodal rehabilitation of faecal incontinence: experience of an Italian centre devoted to faecal disorder rehabilitation. Tech Coloproctol 7:139–147PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Physical diagnosis in the evaluation of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15:1055–1069PubMedCrossRef Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Physical diagnosis in the evaluation of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15:1055–1069PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1525–1532PubMedCrossRef Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1525–1532PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Markland AD, Greer WJ, Vogt A et al (2010) Factors impacting quality of life in women with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1148–1154PubMedCrossRef Markland AD, Greer WJ, Vogt A et al (2010) Factors impacting quality of life in women with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1148–1154PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Engel AF, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ (1995) Relationship of symptoms in faecal incontinence to specific sphincter abnormalities. Int J Colorect Dis 10:152–155CrossRef Engel AF, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ (1995) Relationship of symptoms in faecal incontinence to specific sphincter abnormalities. Int J Colorect Dis 10:152–155CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A et al (1996) Anterior rectocele and anorectal dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:1–9PubMedCrossRef Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A et al (1996) Anterior rectocele and anorectal dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:1–9PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Martelli H, Devroede G, Arhan P, Duguay C, Dornic C, Faverdin C (1978) Some parameters of large bowel motility in normal man. Gastroenterology 75:612–618PubMed Martelli H, Devroede G, Arhan P, Duguay C, Dornic C, Faverdin C (1978) Some parameters of large bowel motility in normal man. Gastroenterology 75:612–618PubMed
18.
go back to reference Baig MK, Wexner SD (2000) Factors predictive of outcome after surgery for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 87:1316–1330PubMedCrossRef Baig MK, Wexner SD (2000) Factors predictive of outcome after surgery for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 87:1316–1330PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Norderval S, Markskog A, Røssaak K, Vonen B (2008) Correlation between anal sphincter defects and anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter tears: assessment using scoring systems for sonographic classification of defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:78–84PubMedCrossRef Norderval S, Markskog A, Røssaak K, Vonen B (2008) Correlation between anal sphincter defects and anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter tears: assessment using scoring systems for sonographic classification of defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:78–84PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–78PubMedCrossRef Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–78PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence: What is the influence of anal sphincter lesions?
Authors
F. Pucciani
M. Raggioli
R. Gattai
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0923-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2013 Go to the issue