Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2007

Open Access 01-02-2007 | Research

Regional distribution of acoustic-based lung vibration as a function of mechanical ventilation mode

Authors: R Phillip Dellinger, Smith Jean, Ismail Cinel, Christina Tay, Susmita Rajanala, Yael A Glickman, Joseph E Parrillo

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

There are several ventilator modes that are used for maintenance mechanical ventilation but no conclusive evidence that one mode of ventilation is better than another. Vibration response imaging is a novel bedside imaging technique that displays vibration energy of lung sounds generated during the respiratory cycle as a real-time structural and functional image of the respiration process. In this study, we objectively evaluated the differences in regional lung vibration during different modes of mechanical ventilation by means of this new technology.

Methods

Vibration response imaging was performed on 38 patients on assist volume control, assist pressure control, and pressure support modes of mechanical ventilation with constant tidal volumes. Images and vibration intensities of three lung regions at maximal inspiration were analyzed.

Results

There was a significant increase in overall geographical area (p < 0.001) and vibration intensity (p < 0.02) in pressure control and pressure support (greatest in pressure support), compared to volume control, when each patient served as his or her own control while targeting the same tidal volume in each mode. This increase in geographical area and vibration intensity occurred primarily in the lower lung regions. The relative percentage increases were 28.5% from volume control to pressure support and 18.8% from volume control to pressure control (p < 0.05). Concomitantly, the areas of the image in the middle lung regions decreased by 3.6% from volume control to pressure support and by 3.7% from volume control to pressure control (p < 0.05). In addition, analysis of regional vibration intensity showed a 35.5% relative percentage increase in the lower region with pressure support versus volume control (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Pressure support and (to a lesser extent) pressure control modes cause a shift of vibration toward lower lung regions compared to volume control when tidal volumes are held constant. Better patient synchronization with the ventilator, greater downward movement of the diaphragm, and decelerating flow waveform are potential physiologic explanations for the redistribution of vibration energy to lower lung regions in pressure-targeted modes of mechanical ventilation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gluck E, Sarrigianidis A, Dellinger RP: Mechanical ventilation. Critical Care Medicine: Principles of Diagnosis and Management in the Adult. Edited by: Parrillo JE, Dellinger RP. 2001, St. Louis: Mosby, 137-161. 2 Gluck E, Sarrigianidis A, Dellinger RP: Mechanical ventilation. Critical Care Medicine: Principles of Diagnosis and Management in the Adult. Edited by: Parrillo JE, Dellinger RP. 2001, St. Louis: Mosby, 137-161. 2
2.
go back to reference Esteban A, Hanzueto A, Alia I, et al: How is mechanical ventilation employed in the intensive care unit? An international utilization review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000, 161: 1450-1458.CrossRefPubMed Esteban A, Hanzueto A, Alia I, et al: How is mechanical ventilation employed in the intensive care unit? An international utilization review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000, 161: 1450-1458.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Baker AB, Colliss JE, Cowie RW: Effect of varying inspiratory flow waveform and time in intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Various physiological variables. Br J Anaesth. 1977, 49: 1221-1234. 10.1093/bja/49.12.1221.CrossRefPubMed Baker AB, Colliss JE, Cowie RW: Effect of varying inspiratory flow waveform and time in intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Various physiological variables. Br J Anaesth. 1977, 49: 1221-1234. 10.1093/bja/49.12.1221.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Campbell RS, Davis BR: Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation: does it matter?. Respir Care. 2002, 47: 416-424.PubMed Campbell RS, Davis BR: Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation: does it matter?. Respir Care. 2002, 47: 416-424.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Chiumello D, Pelosi P, Calvi E: Different modes of assisted ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2002, 20: 925-933. 10.1183/09031936.02.01552001.CrossRefPubMed Chiumello D, Pelosi P, Calvi E: Different modes of assisted ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2002, 20: 925-933. 10.1183/09031936.02.01552001.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kallet RH, Alonos JA, Morabito DJ: The effects of PC vs VC assisted ventilation in acute lung injury and ARDS. Respir Care. 2000, 45: 1085-1096.PubMed Kallet RH, Alonos JA, Morabito DJ: The effects of PC vs VC assisted ventilation in acute lung injury and ARDS. Respir Care. 2000, 45: 1085-1096.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Mead J, Takishina T, Leith D: Stress distribution in lungs: a model of pulmonary elasticity. J Appl Physiol. 1970, 28: 596-608.PubMed Mead J, Takishina T, Leith D: Stress distribution in lungs: a model of pulmonary elasticity. J Appl Physiol. 1970, 28: 596-608.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Rappaport SH, Shipner R, Yoshihara G: Randomized, prospective trial of pressure-limited versus volume-controlled ventilation in severe respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 1994, 22: 22-32.PubMed Rappaport SH, Shipner R, Yoshihara G: Randomized, prospective trial of pressure-limited versus volume-controlled ventilation in severe respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 1994, 22: 22-32.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Davis K, Branson R, Campbell R, Porembka D: Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation: is flow waveform the difference?. J Trauma. 1996, 41: 808-814.CrossRefPubMed Davis K, Branson R, Campbell R, Porembka D: Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation: is flow waveform the difference?. J Trauma. 1996, 41: 808-814.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bergstresser T, Ofengeim D, Vyshedskiy A, Shane J, Murphy R: Sound transmission in the lung as a function of lung volume. J Appl Physiol. 2002, 93: 667-674.CrossRefPubMed Bergstresser T, Ofengeim D, Vyshedskiy A, Shane J, Murphy R: Sound transmission in the lung as a function of lung volume. J Appl Physiol. 2002, 93: 667-674.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kompis M, Pasterkamp H, Wodicka GR: Acoustic imaging of the human chest. Chest. 2001, 120: 1309-1321. 10.1378/chest.120.4.1309.CrossRefPubMed Kompis M, Pasterkamp H, Wodicka GR: Acoustic imaging of the human chest. Chest. 2001, 120: 1309-1321. 10.1378/chest.120.4.1309.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rasanen J, Gavriely N: Response of acoustic transmission to positive airway pressure therapy in experimental lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 2005, 31: 1434-1441. 10.1007/s00134-005-2745-7.CrossRefPubMed Rasanen J, Gavriely N: Response of acoustic transmission to positive airway pressure therapy in experimental lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 2005, 31: 1434-1441. 10.1007/s00134-005-2745-7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jean S, Dellinger RP, Cinel I, Rajanala S, Kushnir I, Parrillo JE: Increased spatial distribution of airflow in lungs with low-level pressure support ventilation compared to maintenance ventilation [abstract]. Crit Care. 2006, 10 (suppl 1): s14-10.1186/cc4380.CrossRef Jean S, Dellinger RP, Cinel I, Rajanala S, Kushnir I, Parrillo JE: Increased spatial distribution of airflow in lungs with low-level pressure support ventilation compared to maintenance ventilation [abstract]. Crit Care. 2006, 10 (suppl 1): s14-10.1186/cc4380.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jean S, Rajanala S, Cinel I, Wang Z, Ferchau L, Lofland K, Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE: Distribution of vibration energy among different modes of mechanical ventilation [abstract]. Chest. 2006, 130: s211-CrossRef Jean S, Rajanala S, Cinel I, Wang Z, Ferchau L, Lofland K, Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE: Distribution of vibration energy among different modes of mechanical ventilation [abstract]. Chest. 2006, 130: s211-CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Prella M, Feihl F, Domenighetti G: Effects of short-term pressure-controlled ventilation on gas exchange, airway pressures, and gas distribution in patients with acute lung injury/ARDS. Comparison with volume-controlled ventilation. Chest. 2002, 122: 1382-1388. 10.1378/chest.122.4.1382.CrossRefPubMed Prella M, Feihl F, Domenighetti G: Effects of short-term pressure-controlled ventilation on gas exchange, airway pressures, and gas distribution in patients with acute lung injury/ARDS. Comparison with volume-controlled ventilation. Chest. 2002, 122: 1382-1388. 10.1378/chest.122.4.1382.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tobin MJ, Jubran A, Laghi F: Patient-ventilator interaction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001, 163: 1059-1063.CrossRefPubMed Tobin MJ, Jubran A, Laghi F: Patient-ventilator interaction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001, 163: 1059-1063.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hess DR, Thompson BT: Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony during lung protective ventilation: what's a clinician to do?. Crit Care Med. 2006, 34: 231-233. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000196083.45897.E9.CrossRefPubMed Hess DR, Thompson BT: Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony during lung protective ventilation: what's a clinician to do?. Crit Care Med. 2006, 34: 231-233. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000196083.45897.E9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Putensen C, Hering R, Wrigge H: Controlled versus assisted mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002, 8: 51-57. 10.1097/00075198-200202000-00009.CrossRefPubMed Putensen C, Hering R, Wrigge H: Controlled versus assisted mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002, 8: 51-57. 10.1097/00075198-200202000-00009.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Putensen C, Muders T, Varelmann D, Wrigge H: The impact of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006, 12: 13-18.CrossRefPubMed Putensen C, Muders T, Varelmann D, Wrigge H: The impact of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006, 12: 13-18.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kleinman BS, Frey K, van Drunen M: Motion of the diaphragm in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease while spontaneously breathing versus during positive pressure breathing after anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 2002, 97: 298-305. 10.1097/00000542-200208000-00003.CrossRefPubMed Kleinman BS, Frey K, van Drunen M: Motion of the diaphragm in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease while spontaneously breathing versus during positive pressure breathing after anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 2002, 97: 298-305. 10.1097/00000542-200208000-00003.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jousela I, Tahvanainen J, Nikki P: Diaphragmatic movement using ultrasound during spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation: effect of tidal volume. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1992, 43: 165-171.PubMed Jousela I, Tahvanainen J, Nikki P: Diaphragmatic movement using ultrasound during spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation: effect of tidal volume. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1992, 43: 165-171.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Reber A, Nylund U, Hedenstierna G: Position and shape of the diaphragm: implications for atelectasis formation. Anaesthesia. 1998, 53: 1054-1061. 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00569.x.CrossRefPubMed Reber A, Nylund U, Hedenstierna G: Position and shape of the diaphragm: implications for atelectasis formation. Anaesthesia. 1998, 53: 1054-1061. 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00569.x.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Neumann P, Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Hinz J, Maripuu E, Andersson LG, Putensen C, Hadenstierna G: Spontaneous breathing affects the spatial ventilation and perfusion distribution during mechanical ventilatory support. Crit Care Med. 2005, 33: 1090-1095. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000163226.34868.0A.CrossRefPubMed Neumann P, Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Hinz J, Maripuu E, Andersson LG, Putensen C, Hadenstierna G: Spontaneous breathing affects the spatial ventilation and perfusion distribution during mechanical ventilatory support. Crit Care Med. 2005, 33: 1090-1095. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000163226.34868.0A.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Neuman P: Spontaneous breathing improves lung aeration in oleic acid-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology. 2003, 99: 376-384. 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00019.CrossRefPubMed Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Neuman P: Spontaneous breathing improves lung aeration in oleic acid-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology. 2003, 99: 376-384. 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00019.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Regional distribution of acoustic-based lung vibration as a function of mechanical ventilation mode
Authors
R Phillip Dellinger
Smith Jean
Ismail Cinel
Christina Tay
Susmita Rajanala
Yael A Glickman
Joseph E Parrillo
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2007
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5706

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Critical Care 1/2007 Go to the issue