Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Brain Topography 2/2010

Open Access 01-06-2010 | Original Paper

Regional Differences in the Sensitivity of MEG for Interictal Spikes in Epilepsy

Authors: Geertjan Huiskamp, Zaloa Agirre-Arrizubieta, Frans Leijten

Published in: Brain Topography | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

MEG interictal spikes as recorded in epilepsy patients are a reflection of intracranial interictal activity. This study investigates the relationship between the estimated sources of MEG spikes and the location, distribution and size of interictal spikes in the invasive ECoG of a group of 38 epilepsy patients that are monitored for pre-surgical evaluation. An amplitude/surface area measure is defined to quantify and rank ECoG spikes. It is found that all MEG spikes are associated with an ECoG spike that is among the three highest ranked in a patient. Among the different brain regions considered, the fronto-orbital, inter-hemispheric, tempero-lateral and central regions stand out. In an accompanying simulation study it is shown that for hypothesized extended sources of larger sizes, as suggested by the data, source location, orientation and curvature can partly explain the observed sensitivity of MEG for interictal spikes.
Literature
go back to reference Agirre-Arrizubieta Z, Huiskamp GJ, Ferrier CH, van Huffelen AC, Leijten FS (2009) Interictal magneto-encephalography and the irritative zone in the electrocorticogram. Brain 132(11):3060–3072CrossRefPubMed Agirre-Arrizubieta Z, Huiskamp GJ, Ferrier CH, van Huffelen AC, Leijten FS (2009) Interictal magneto-encephalography and the irritative zone in the electrocorticogram. Brain 132(11):3060–3072CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference de Jongh A, de Munck JC, Gonçalves SI, Ossenblok P (2005) Differences in MEG/EEG epileptic spike yields explained by regional differences in signal-to-noise ratios. J Clin Neurophysiol 22(2):153–158CrossRefPubMed de Jongh A, de Munck JC, Gonçalves SI, Ossenblok P (2005) Differences in MEG/EEG epileptic spike yields explained by regional differences in signal-to-noise ratios. J Clin Neurophysiol 22(2):153–158CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Goldenholz DM, Ahlfors SP, Hämäläinen MS, Sharon D, Ishitobi M, Vaina LM, Stufflebeam SM (2009) Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp 30(4):1077–1086CrossRefPubMed Goldenholz DM, Ahlfors SP, Hämäläinen MS, Sharon D, Ishitobi M, Vaina LM, Stufflebeam SM (2009) Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp 30(4):1077–1086CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hillebrand A, Barnes GR (2002) A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex. Neuroimage 16(3):638–650CrossRefPubMed Hillebrand A, Barnes GR (2002) A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex. Neuroimage 16(3):638–650CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Huiskamp GJ, van der Meij W, van Huffelen AC, van Nieuwenhuizen O (2004) High resolution spatio-temporal EEG-MEG analysis of rolandic spikes. J Clin Neurophysiol 21(2):84–95CrossRefPubMed Huiskamp GJ, van der Meij W, van Huffelen AC, van Nieuwenhuizen O (2004) High resolution spatio-temporal EEG-MEG analysis of rolandic spikes. J Clin Neurophysiol 21(2):84–95CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mosher JC, Lewis PS, Leahy RM (1992) Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39(6):541–557CrossRefPubMed Mosher JC, Lewis PS, Leahy RM (1992) Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39(6):541–557CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rorden C, Brett M (2000) Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 12(4):191–200PubMed Rorden C, Brett M (2000) Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 12(4):191–200PubMed
go back to reference Tao JX, Ray A, Hawes-Ebersole S, Ebersole JS (2005) Intracranial EEG substrates of scalp EEG interictal spikes. Epilepsia 46(5):669–676CrossRefPubMed Tao JX, Ray A, Hawes-Ebersole S, Ebersole JS (2005) Intracranial EEG substrates of scalp EEG interictal spikes. Epilepsia 46(5):669–676CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Oosterom A, Oostendorp TF, Huiskamp GJ, ter Brake HJ (1995) The magnetocardiogram as derived from electrocardiographic data. Circ Res 67(5):1503–1509 van Oosterom A, Oostendorp TF, Huiskamp GJ, ter Brake HJ (1995) The magnetocardiogram as derived from electrocardiographic data. Circ Res 67(5):1503–1509
go back to reference van t’ Ent D, Manshanden I, Ossenblok P, Velis DN, de Munck JC, Verbunt JP, Lopes da Silva F (2003) Spike cluster analysis in neocortical localization related epilepsy yields clinically significant equivalent source localization results in MEG. Clin Neurophysiol 114(10):1948–1962CrossRef van t’ Ent D, Manshanden I, Ossenblok P, Velis DN, de Munck JC, Verbunt JP, Lopes da Silva F (2003) Spike cluster analysis in neocortical localization related epilepsy yields clinically significant equivalent source localization results in MEG. Clin Neurophysiol 114(10):1948–1962CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Regional Differences in the Sensitivity of MEG for Interictal Spikes in Epilepsy
Authors
Geertjan Huiskamp
Zaloa Agirre-Arrizubieta
Frans Leijten
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Brain Topography / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0896-0267
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6792
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-010-0134-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Brain Topography 2/2010 Go to the issue