Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Refractive Errors | Research article

Comparing habitual and i. Scription refractions

Authors: Nicole M. Putnam, Balamurali Vasudevan, Andre Juarez, Cam Tu Le, Kristine Sam, Pablo de Gracia, Allissun Hoppert

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many patients voice concerns regarding poor night vision, even when they see 20/20 or better in the exam room. During mesopic and scotopic conditions the pupil size increases, increasing the effects on visual performance of uncorrected (residual) refractive errors. The i.Scription refraction method claims to optimize traditional refractions for mesopic and scotopic conditions, by using the information that the Zeiss i.Profilerplus gathers of ocular aberrations (low and high order). The aim of this study was to investigate any differences between habitual and i.Scription refractions and their relationship to night vision complaints.

Methods

Habitual, subjective, and i.Scription refractions were obtained from both eyes of eighteen subjects. Low and high order aberrations of the subjects were recorded with the Zeiss i.Profilerplus. The root mean square (RMS) metric was calculated for small (3 mm) and maximum pupil sizes. Subjects rated their difficulty with driving at night on a scale of 1–10.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference between the habitual and i.Scription refractions on both the sphere and cylinder values [(t = 3.12, p < 0.01), (t = 5.39, p < 0.01)]. The same was found when comparing the subjective and i.Scription refractions [(t = 2.31, p = 0.03), (t = 2.54, p = 0.02)]. There were no significant differences found when comparing the sphere and cylinder values between the habitual and subjective refractions or on any combination of spherical equivalent refraction. The maximum pupil size of the subject population on this study, measured with the i.Profilerplus, was 4.8 ± 1.04 mm. Ten out of the eighteen subjects had discomfort at night with an average magnitude of 4 ± 2.7. Ratings of difficulty with night vision correlated with the change in spherical equivalent correction between the habitual and i.Scription refractions (p = 0.01). A sub-analysis of myopic subjects (n = 15) showed an increase in the significance of this relationship (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

The i.Scription method improves night vision by correcting the sphere and cylinder more precisely. There was a correlation between the amount of change in the cylinder value between habitual and i.Scription prescriptions and the magnitude of the reported visual discomfort at night.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Owens DA, Leibowitz HW. Night myopia: cause and possible basis for amelioration. Am J Optom Phys Opt. 1976;53:709–17.CrossRef Owens DA, Leibowitz HW. Night myopia: cause and possible basis for amelioration. Am J Optom Phys Opt. 1976;53:709–17.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Leibowitz HW, Owens DA. Night myopia and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. J Opt Soc Am. 1975;65:1121–8.CrossRef Leibowitz HW, Owens DA. Night myopia and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. J Opt Soc Am. 1975;65:1121–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Charman WN. Night myopia and driving. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1996;16:474–85.CrossRef Charman WN. Night myopia and driving. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1996;16:474–85.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Arumi P, Chauhan K, Charman WN. Accommodation and acuity under night-driving illumination levels. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1997;17:291–9.CrossRef Arumi P, Chauhan K, Charman WN. Accommodation and acuity under night-driving illumination levels. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1997;17:291–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ciuffreda KJ. Accommodation, pupil, and presbyopia. In: Benjamin W. Borish’s clinical refraction. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2006. p. 93–143.CrossRef Ciuffreda KJ. Accommodation, pupil, and presbyopia. In: Benjamin W. Borish’s clinical refraction. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2006. p. 93–143.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference López-Gil N, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Thibos LN, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Shedding light on night myopia. J Vis. 2012;12:1–9.CrossRef López-Gil N, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Thibos LN, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Shedding light on night myopia. J Vis. 2012;12:1–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fejer TP. Correction of night myopia and glare for night driving. Can J Ophthalmol. 1995;30:25–7.PubMed Fejer TP. Correction of night myopia and glare for night driving. Can J Ophthalmol. 1995;30:25–7.PubMed
8.
go back to reference López-Gil N, Fernández-Sánchez V, Legras R, Montés-Micó R, Lara F, Nguyen-Khoa JL. Accommodation-related changes in monochromatic aberrations of the human eye as a function of age. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1736–43.CrossRef López-Gil N, Fernández-Sánchez V, Legras R, Montés-Micó R, Lara F, Nguyen-Khoa JL. Accommodation-related changes in monochromatic aberrations of the human eye as a function of age. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1736–43.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Levene JR. Nevil Maskelyne FRS. The discovery of night myopia. Notes Records Royal Soc London. 1965;20:100–8.CrossRef Levene JR. Nevil Maskelyne FRS. The discovery of night myopia. Notes Records Royal Soc London. 1965;20:100–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ivanoff A. On the influence of accommodation on spherical aberration in the human eye, an attempt to interpret night myopia. J Opt Soc A. 1947;37:730.CrossRef Ivanoff A. On the influence of accommodation on spherical aberration in the human eye, an attempt to interpret night myopia. J Opt Soc A. 1947;37:730.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ommani A, Hutchings N, Thapa D, Lashminarayanan V. Pupil scaling for the estimation of aberrations in natural pupils. Opt Vis Sci. 2014;91:1175–82.CrossRef Ommani A, Hutchings N, Thapa D, Lashminarayanan V. Pupil scaling for the estimation of aberrations in natural pupils. Opt Vis Sci. 2014;91:1175–82.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leube A, Tabernero J, Ohlendorf A, Wahl S. Relationship between the subjectively and objectively determined depth of focus of the human eye using defocus curves. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; E-abstract: 6016–6016. Leube A, Tabernero J, Ohlendorf A, Wahl S. Relationship between the subjectively and objectively determined depth of focus of the human eye using defocus curves. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; E-abstract: 6016–6016.
13.
go back to reference Faria-Ribeiro M, Navarro R, González-Méijome JM. Effect of pupil size on Wavefront refraction during orthokeratology. Opt Vis Sci. 2016;93:1399–408.CrossRef Faria-Ribeiro M, Navarro R, González-Méijome JM. Effect of pupil size on Wavefront refraction during orthokeratology. Opt Vis Sci. 2016;93:1399–408.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Marín-Franch I, Xu R, Bradley A, Thibos LN, López-Gil N. The effect of spherical aberration on visual performance and refractive state for stimuli and tasks typical of night viewing. J Optom. 2017;17:30085–7. Marín-Franch I, Xu R, Bradley A, Thibos LN, López-Gil N. The effect of spherical aberration on visual performance and refractive state for stimuli and tasks typical of night viewing. J Optom. 2017;17:30085–7.
15.
go back to reference Lebow K, Campbell CE. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction. Opt Vis Sci. 2014;91:1191–8.CrossRef Lebow K, Campbell CE. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction. Opt Vis Sci. 2014;91:1191–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Meister D, Thibos L. i.Scription by ZEISS: setting the new standard of vision correction. Carl Zeiss vision report. 2010. Meister D, Thibos L. i.Scription by ZEISS: setting the new standard of vision correction. Carl Zeiss vision report. 2010.
17.
go back to reference Medina Jr., Arthur. New breed of refractors much more precise. Primary care optometry news. August 2011. Medina Jr., Arthur. New breed of refractors much more precise. Primary care optometry news. August 2011.
18.
go back to reference Spitzer M, Wildenhain J, Rappsilber J, Tyers M. BoxPlotR: a web tool for generation of box plots. Nat Meth. 2014;11:121–2.CrossRef Spitzer M, Wildenhain J, Rappsilber J, Tyers M. BoxPlotR: a web tool for generation of box plots. Nat Meth. 2014;11:121–2.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bennett JR, Stalboerger GM, Hodge DO, Schornack MM. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction. J Optom. 2015;8:109–15.CrossRef Bennett JR, Stalboerger GM, Hodge DO, Schornack MM. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction. J Optom. 2015;8:109–15.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Watson AB, Ahumada AJ. Predicting visual acuity from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2008;8(17):11–9. Watson AB, Ahumada AJ. Predicting visual acuity from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2008;8(17):11–9.
22.
go back to reference Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2004;4:329–51.CrossRef Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2004;4:329–51.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Salmon T, van de Pol C. Normal-eye Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square wavefront errors. J Cat Ref Surg. 2006;32:2064–74.CrossRef Salmon T, van de Pol C. Normal-eye Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square wavefront errors. J Cat Ref Surg. 2006;32:2064–74.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Thibos LN, Ye M, Zhang X, Bradley A. Spherical aberration of the reduced schematic eye with elliptical refracting surface. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:548–56.CrossRef Thibos LN, Ye M, Zhang X, Bradley A. Spherical aberration of the reduced schematic eye with elliptical refracting surface. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:548–56.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Martin J, Vasudevan B, Himebaugh N, Bradley A, Thibos L. Unbiased estimation of refractive state of aberrated eyes. Vis Res. 2011;51:1932–40.CrossRef Martin J, Vasudevan B, Himebaugh N, Bradley A, Thibos L. Unbiased estimation of refractive state of aberrated eyes. Vis Res. 2011;51:1932–40.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Marin-Franch I, Renfeng X, Bradley A, Thibos LN. The effect of spherical aberration on visual performance and refractive state for stimuli and tasks typical of night viewing. J Optom. 2017;11:144–52.CrossRef Marin-Franch I, Renfeng X, Bradley A, Thibos LN. The effect of spherical aberration on visual performance and refractive state for stimuli and tasks typical of night viewing. J Optom. 2017;11:144–52.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bradley A, Xu R, Thibos L, Marin G, Hernandez M. Influence of spherical aberration, stimulus spatial frequency, and pupil apodisation on subjective refractions. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2014;34:309–20.CrossRef Bradley A, Xu R, Thibos L, Marin G, Hernandez M. Influence of spherical aberration, stimulus spatial frequency, and pupil apodisation on subjective refractions. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2014;34:309–20.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Charman N. The Charles F. Prentice award lecture 2005: optics of the human eye: progress and problems. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:335–45.CrossRef Charman N. The Charles F. Prentice award lecture 2005: optics of the human eye: progress and problems. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:335–45.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparing habitual and i. Scription refractions
Authors
Nicole M. Putnam
Balamurali Vasudevan
Andre Juarez
Cam Tu Le
Kristine Sam
Pablo de Gracia
Allissun Hoppert
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1053-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2019 Go to the issue