Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Original Research

Reductions in Use of Colchicine after FDA Enforcement of Market Exclusivity in a Commercially Insured Population

Authors: Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH, Jessica M. Franklin, PhD, Seoyoung C. Kim, MD, ScD, MSCE, John D. Seeger, PharmD, DrPH, Daniel H. Solomon, MD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A brand-name version of colchicine (Colcrys) was introduced after its manufacturer conducted a clinical trial in acute gout patients, leading to higher prices for this drug.

Objective

We analyzed the impact of the new single-source colchicine product on prescribing and patient health spending as well as incidence rates of potentially dangerous concomitant use of clarithromycin and cyclosporine after formal FDA approval.

Design/Participants

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of UnitedHealth-affiliated enrollees newly diagnosed with gout or FMF.

Main Measures

Among gout and FMF patients separately, we assessed linear trends in colchicine prescriptions, prescription drug costs, and total health care costs from 2009 to September 2010 (market exclusivity announced) compared to January 2011 (market exclusivity enforced) through 2012. Next, we estimated trends in co-prescription within 15 days of clarithromycin, azithromycin (indicated on the Colcrys label for use in place of clarithromycin), and cyclosporine.

Key Results

Among gout patients, before Colcrys’ market exclusivity, the odds of receiving colchicine within 30 days of gout diagnosis increased 1.4 %/month (OR: 1.014, 95 % CI: 1.011–1.018). Following FDA action, the odds decreased by 0.5 %/month (OR: 0.995, 95 % CI: 0.992–0.999) (p < 0.001). Similarly, among FMF patients, odds of initiating colchicine changed from an increase of 2.8 %/month to a decrease by 7.6 %/month (p = 0.01). Patients receiving colchicine experienced increases in average monthly prescription drug costs ($418 vs. $651, p < 0.001) and health care costs ($3,406 vs. $3,534, p < 0.001). Incidence rates of colchicine/clarithromycin co-prescription before and after FDA action did not change, while co-prescription of colchicine/cyclosporine increased after introduction of Colcrys [−0.75 monthly change in patients (95 % CI: -1.07, -0.43) vs. 0.13 (95 % CI: -0.16, 0.42), p < 0.001].

Conclusions

The FDA’s actions were associated with a reduction in colchicine initiation and an increase in patient spending. By contrast, we did not observe any association with improvements in avoidance of potentially dangerous co-prescriptions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carpenter D. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton: Princeton Univ Press; 2010. Carpenter D. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton: Princeton Univ Press; 2010.
3.
go back to reference Terkeltaub RA, Furst DE, Bennett K, Kook KA, Crockett RS, Davis MW. High versus low dosing of oral colchicine for early acute gout flare: twenty-four–hour outcome of the first multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled, parallel-group, dose-comparison colchicine study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(4):1060–8.CrossRefPubMed Terkeltaub RA, Furst DE, Bennett K, Kook KA, Crockett RS, Davis MW. High versus low dosing of oral colchicine for early acute gout flare: twenty-four–hour outcome of the first multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled, parallel-group, dose-comparison colchicine study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(4):1060–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, Pascual E, Barskova V, Conaghan P, Gerster J, Jacobs J, Leeb B, Liote F, McCarthy G, Netter P, Nuki G, Perez-Ruiz F, Pignone A, Pimentao J, Punzi L, Roddy E, Uhlig T, Zimmermann-Gorska I. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout, part II: management. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(10):1312–24.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, Pascual E, Barskova V, Conaghan P, Gerster J, Jacobs J, Leeb B, Liote F, McCarthy G, Netter P, Nuki G, Perez-Ruiz F, Pignone A, Pimentao J, Punzi L, Roddy E, Uhlig T, Zimmermann-Gorska I. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout, part II: management. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(10):1312–24.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ahern MJ, Reid C, Gordon TP, McCredie M, Brooks PM, Jones M. Does colchicine work? The results of the first controlled study in acute gout. Aust NZ J Med. 1987;17(3):301–4.CrossRef Ahern MJ, Reid C, Gordon TP, McCredie M, Brooks PM, Jones M. Does colchicine work? The results of the first controlled study in acute gout. Aust NZ J Med. 1987;17(3):301–4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kesselheim AS, Solomon DH. Author Reply re: Incentives for drug development—the curious case of colchicine. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(15):1484–5.CrossRef Kesselheim AS, Solomon DH. Author Reply re: Incentives for drug development—the curious case of colchicine. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(15):1484–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rockoff JD. An old gout drug gets new life and a new price, riling patients. Wall St. J. 12 Apr 2010. Rockoff JD. An old gout drug gets new life and a new price, riling patients. Wall St. J. 12 Apr 2010.
9.
go back to reference Kesselheim AS, Solomon DH. Incentives for drug development—the curious case of colchicine. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2045–7.CrossRefPubMed Kesselheim AS, Solomon DH. Incentives for drug development—the curious case of colchicine. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2045–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Woodcock J, Okada S. Letter to the Editor re: Incentives for drug development—the curious case of colchicine. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(15):1484.CrossRefPubMed Woodcock J, Okada S. Letter to the Editor re: Incentives for drug development—the curious case of colchicine. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(15):1484.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Terkeltaub RA, Furst DE, Digiacinto JL, Kook KA, Davis MW. Novel evidence-based colchicine dose-reduction algorithm to predict and prevent colchicine toxicity in the presence of cytochrome P450 3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(8):2226–37.CrossRefPubMed Terkeltaub RA, Furst DE, Digiacinto JL, Kook KA, Davis MW. Novel evidence-based colchicine dose-reduction algorithm to predict and prevent colchicine toxicity in the presence of cytochrome P450 3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(8):2226–37.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Eng PM, Johannes CB, Chiang CC, West WA, Seeger JD, Walker AM. Survey of disability, medication use, and medication satisfaction among members with rheumatoid arthritis of a large health care plan database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14:S1–218. Eng PM, Johannes CB, Chiang CC, West WA, Seeger JD, Walker AM. Survey of disability, medication use, and medication satisfaction among members with rheumatoid arthritis of a large health care plan database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14:S1–218.
16.
go back to reference UnitedHealthcare. Your 2012 prescription drug list: quick-reference guide. Sept 2011. UnitedHealthcare. Your 2012 prescription drug list: quick-reference guide. Sept 2011.
17.
go back to reference UnitedHealthcare. 2011 three-tier prescription drug list: consumer reference guide. Sept 2010. UnitedHealthcare. 2011 three-tier prescription drug list: consumer reference guide. Sept 2010.
18.
go back to reference Westphal JF. Macrolide-induced clinically relevant drug interactions with cytochrome P-450A (CYP) 3A4: an update focused on clarithromycin, azithromycin and dirithromycin. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50(4):285–95.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Westphal JF. Macrolide-induced clinically relevant drug interactions with cytochrome P-450A (CYP) 3A4: an update focused on clarithromycin, azithromycin and dirithromycin. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50(4):285–95.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2008. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(10):3136–41.CrossRefPubMed Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2008. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(10):3136–41.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Meyer H. Is FDA approval for safety…or price gouging? LA Times. 18 Jan 2010. Meyer H. Is FDA approval for safety…or price gouging? LA Times. 18 Jan 2010.
24.
go back to reference Grody WW, Getzug T. Colchicine’s other indication—effect of FDA action. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(23):2267–8.CrossRefPubMed Grody WW, Getzug T. Colchicine’s other indication—effect of FDA action. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(23):2267–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rosenthal E. The soaring cost of a single breath. NY Times. 12 Oct 2013. Rosenthal E. The soaring cost of a single breath. NY Times. 12 Oct 2013.
27.
go back to reference Janssens HJ, Lucassen PL, Van de Laar FA, Janssen M, Van de Lisdonk EH. Systematic corticosteroids for acute gout. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2, CD005521.PubMed Janssens HJ, Lucassen PL, Van de Laar FA, Janssen M, Van de Lisdonk EH. Systematic corticosteroids for acute gout. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2, CD005521.PubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Howard DH. Drug companies’ patient-assistance programs–helping patients or profits? N Engl J Med. 2014;371(2):97–9.CrossRefPubMed Howard DH. Drug companies’ patient-assistance programs–helping patients or profits? N Engl J Med. 2014;371(2):97–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Hung IF, Wu AK, Cheng VC, Tang BS, To KW, Yeung CK, Woo PC, Lau SK, Cheung BM, Yuen KY. Fatal interaction between clarithromycin and colchicine in patients with renal insufficiency: a retrospective study. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(3):291–300.CrossRefPubMed Hung IF, Wu AK, Cheng VC, Tang BS, To KW, Yeung CK, Woo PC, Lau SK, Cheung BM, Yuen KY. Fatal interaction between clarithromycin and colchicine in patients with renal insufficiency: a retrospective study. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(3):291–300.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Khanna D, Fitzgeralf JD, Khanna PP, Bae S, Signh MK, Neogi T, Pillinger MH, Merill J, Lee S, Prakash S, Kaldas M, Gogia M, Perez-Ruiz F, Taylor W, Liote F, Choi H, Singh JA, Dalbeth N, Kaplan S, Niyyar V, Jones D, Yarows SA, Roessler B, Kerr G, King C, Levy G, Furst DE, Edwards NL, Mandell B, Schumacher HR, Robbins M, Wenger N, Terkeltaub R. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(10):1431–46.CrossRef Khanna D, Fitzgeralf JD, Khanna PP, Bae S, Signh MK, Neogi T, Pillinger MH, Merill J, Lee S, Prakash S, Kaldas M, Gogia M, Perez-Ruiz F, Taylor W, Liote F, Choi H, Singh JA, Dalbeth N, Kaplan S, Niyyar V, Jones D, Yarows SA, Roessler B, Kerr G, King C, Levy G, Furst DE, Edwards NL, Mandell B, Schumacher HR, Robbins M, Wenger N, Terkeltaub R. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(10):1431–46.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reductions in Use of Colchicine after FDA Enforcement of Market Exclusivity in a Commercially Insured Population
Authors
Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH
Jessica M. Franklin, PhD
Seoyoung C. Kim, MD, ScD, MSCE
John D. Seeger, PharmD, DrPH
Daniel H. Solomon, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3285-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2015 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

CMS Reimbursement Reform

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine