Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 3/2024

Open Access 27-02-2024 | Original Article

Reducing sickness absence among public-sector healthcare employees: the difference-making roles of managerial and employee participation

Authors: M. Akerstrom, J. Severin, E. J. Miech, E. Wikström, M. Roczniewska

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluations of organizational-level interventions to prevent work-related illness have identified enabling factors, but knowledge of necessary and sufficient conditions for intervention success is needed. The aim was to identify difference-making factors that distinguish intervention groups with and without a positive intervention effect on sickness absence.

Methods

An organizational-level intervention designed to decrease sickness absence by providing support from process facilitators was implemented at eight healthcare workplaces in Sweden between 2017 and 2018. We applied coincidence analysis (CNA) to analyze 34 factors and determine which factors were necessary and sufficient for a successful implementation of tailored interventional measures on an organizational level (dichotomous) and reduced sickness absence (trichotomous).

Results

Two factors perfectly explained both the presence and absence of a successful implementation: “a high sense of urgency” and “good anchoring and participation from the strategic management”. The presence of either of these factors alone was sufficient for successful implementation, whereas the joint absence of both conditions was necessary and sufficient for the absence of successful implementation and an intervention effect. In addition, high employee participation was both necessary and sufficient for a high intervention effect. For organizations without high employee participation, successful implementation led to a medium-effect size.

Conclusions

This study identified participation as a difference-maker in the implementation process. Participation from different stakeholders turned out to be important in different phases. When implementing organizational-level interventions, high participation from both strategic management and employees appears to be crucial in terms of the intervention’s effect on sickness absence.
Literature
go back to reference Cox T, Karanika M, Griffiths A et al (2007) Evaluating organizational-level work stress interventions: beyond traditional methods. Work Stress 21(4):348–362CrossRef Cox T, Karanika M, Griffiths A et al (2007) Evaluating organizational-level work stress interventions: beyond traditional methods. Work Stress 21(4):348–362CrossRef
go back to reference Greasley K, Edwards P (2015) When do health and well-being interventions work? Managerial commitment and context. Econ Ind Democr 36(2):355–377CrossRef Greasley K, Edwards P (2015) When do health and well-being interventions work? Managerial commitment and context. Econ Ind Democr 36(2):355–377CrossRef
go back to reference Kompier MKT (2001) Stress in the workplace: past, present and future. In: Durham (ed). Whurr Publishers, London Kompier MKT (2001) Stress in the workplace: past, present and future. In: Durham (ed). Whurr Publishers, London
go back to reference LaMontagne AD, Noblet AJ, Landsbergis PA (2012) Intervention development and implementation: Understanding and addressing barriers to organizational-level interventions improving organizational interventions for stress and well-being: addressing process and context. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp 21–38 LaMontagne AD, Noblet AJ, Landsbergis PA (2012) Intervention development and implementation: Understanding and addressing barriers to organizational-level interventions improving organizational interventions for stress and well-being: addressing process and context. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp 21–38
go back to reference McFillen JM, O’Neil DA, Balzer WK et al (2013) Organizational diagnosis: an evidence-based approach. J Chang Manag 13(2):223–246CrossRef McFillen JM, O’Neil DA, Balzer WK et al (2013) Organizational diagnosis: an evidence-based approach. J Chang Manag 13(2):223–246CrossRef
go back to reference Miles M, Huberman A, Saldana J (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks Miles M, Huberman A, Saldana J (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks
go back to reference Nielsen K, Abildgaard JS (2013) Organizational interventions: a research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects. Work Stress 27(3):278–297CrossRef Nielsen K, Abildgaard JS (2013) Organizational interventions: a research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects. Work Stress 27(3):278–297CrossRef
go back to reference Nielsen K, Randall R, Karanika-Murray M, et al. (2015) Derailed organizational interventions for stress and well-being Nielsen K, Randall R, Karanika-Murray M, et al. (2015) Derailed organizational interventions for stress and well-being
go back to reference Rosskam E (2018) Using participatory action research methodology to improve worker health: causes, consequences, cures. pp 211–228 Rosskam E (2018) Using participatory action research methodology to improve worker health: causes, consequences, cures. pp 211–228
Metadata
Title
Reducing sickness absence among public-sector healthcare employees: the difference-making roles of managerial and employee participation
Authors
M. Akerstrom
J. Severin
E. J. Miech
E. Wikström
M. Roczniewska
Publication date
27-02-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-024-02048-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 3/2024 Go to the issue