Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 3/2013

01-09-2013

Reducing Sexual Risk Behavior Among High-Risk Couples in Northern India

Authors: Deborah Jones, Rashmi Bagga, Ritu Nehra, Deepika, Sunil Sethi, Kamini Walia, Mahendra Kumar, Olga Villar-Loubet, Maria Lopez, Stephen M. Weiss

Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With a population of 1.1 billion, India is considered to be a country in which effective prevention interventions could contain the development of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic. Heterosexual transmission accounts for 85 % of the extant HIV infections.

Purpose

This study sought to assess the feasibility of conducting a group, culturally tailored behavioral intervention and its impact on sexual barrier use, self-efficacy, knowledge, conflict resolution, and coping among high-risk heterosexual couples in Northern India.

Method

This pilot study was conducted at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India from February 2008 to January 2009. Thirty sexually active high-risk couples were drawn from a convenience sample of PGIMER patients attending infectious disease and family planning clinics. Couples participated in 1 month of three weekly gender-concordant behavioral intervention groups and were individually administered assessments preintervention and post-intervention. The intervention was tailored to the Northern Indian context and addressed sexual barrier use, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/sexually transmitted infection transmission, and cognitive behavioral skill building focusing on sexual negotiation and communication.

Results

The participants had a mean age of 32 years (men) and 29 years (women), and the majority had at least 10 years of education. At baseline, the majority reported inconsistent condom use (<100 % of the time; 64 % of women, 59 % of men). Post-intervention, nearly all participants reported consistent condom use (100 % of the time; 100 % of men, 97 % of women). Participants also reported decreased verbal aggression, increased self-efficacy, and increased HIV-related knowledge, and women increased their use of positive coping tactics.

Conclusions

The results highlight the potential to successfully utilize a group intervention to discuss sensitive issues such as sexual risk behavior among both men and women. Strategies to improve condom use and communication without increasing intimate partner violence in high-risk couples may be an important adjunct to preventing the development of a generalized epidemic in India.
Literature
1.
2.
World Health Organization. UNAIDS-WHO Joint United National Programme on HIV/AIDS. AIDS Epidemic Update, Geneva: 2005.
3.
Claeson M, Alexander A. Tackling HIV in India: evidence-based priority setting and programming. Heal Aff. 2008;27:1091–102.CrossRef
4.
5.
Khan ME, Mishra A, Morankar S. Exploring opportunities to project a “responsible man” image: gatekeepers views of young men’s sexual and reproductive health needs in Uttaranchal, India. Int Q Comm Health. 2008;28(1):13–31.CrossRef
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Schensul SL, Mekki-Berrada A, Nastasi BK, Singh R, Burleson JA, Bojko M. Men’s extramarital sex, marital relationships and sexual risk in urban poor communities in India. J Urban Health. 2006;83(4):614–24.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Nag M. Sexual behavior in India with risk of HIV/AIDS transmission. Health Trans Rev. 1995;1995(5):293–305.
12.
Decker MR, Seage GR, Hemenway D, et al. Intimate partner violence functions as both a risk marker and risk factor for women’s HIV infection: findings from Indian husband–wife dyads. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51:593–600.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Ramu GN. Indian husbands: their role perceptions and performance in single- and dual-earner families. J Marriage Fam. 1987;1987(49):903–15.
14.
15.
16.
Blankenship KM, West BS, Kershaw TS, Biradavolu MR. Power, community mobilization, and condom use practices among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India. AIDS. 2008;22:S109–16.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Tolley E, Eng E, Kohli R, Bentley M, Mehendale S, Bunce A, Severy L. Examining the context of microbicide acceptability among married women and men in India. Cult Heal Sex. 2006;8:351–69.CrossRef
18.
Bhattacharya G. Sociocultural and behavioral contexts of condom use in heterosexual married couples in India: challenges to the HIV prevention program. Health Educ & Behav. 2004;31(1):101–17.CrossRef
19.
Chandrasekaran P, Dallabetta G, Loo V, Rao S, Gayle H, Alexander A. Containing HIV/AIDS in India: the unfinished agenda. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:508–21.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Silverman JG, Decker MR, Saggurti N, Balaiah D, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and HIV infection among married Indian women. JAMA. 2008;300(6):703–10.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Stephenson R, Koening MA, Ahmed S. Domestic violence and symptoms of gynecologic morbidity among women in North India. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006;32(4):201–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Desai S. HIV and domestic violence: intersections in the lives of married women in India. Health & Hum Rights. 2005;8:140–68.CrossRef
23.
Sethulakshmi CJ, Srikrishnan AK, Ganesh AK, Vasudevan CK, Solomon S. International Conference on AIDS 2004. Domestic violence & HIV—findings from a pilot study in Chennai, India. Int Conf AIDS. Jul 11–16; 15: abstract no. WePeD6526. 2004: Bangkok, Thailand
24.
Solomon S, Subbaraman R, Solomon SS, et al. Domestic violence and forced sex among the urban poor in South India: implications for HIV prevention. Violence Against Women. 2009;15:753–73.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Kishor S, Johnson K. Profiling domestic violence: a multi-country study. Calverton: ORC Macro; 2004.
26.
Rao V. Wife-beating in rural South India: a qualitative and econometric analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:1169–80.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Khan ME, Townsend JW, Sinha R, Lakhanpal S. Sexual violence within marriage. In: Seminar. Population Council: New Delhi; 1996. p. 32-5.
28.
Joglekar NS, Joshi SN, Navlakha SN, Katti UR, Mehendale SM. Acceptability of Praneem polyherbal vaginal tablet among HIV uninfected women and their male partners in Pune India—phase I study. Indian J Med Res. 2006;123:547–52.PubMed
29.
Risbud A. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) & sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Indian J Med Res. 2005;121:369–76.PubMed
30.
31.
Subramanian T, Gupte MD, Paranjape RS, et al. HIV, sexually transmitted infections and sexual behavior of male clients of female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, India: results of a cross-sectional survey. AIDS. 2008;22:S69–79.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Bell DC, Atkinson JS, Mosier V, Riley M, Brown VL. The HIV transmission gradient: relationship patterns of protection. AIDS Behav. 2007;11:789–811.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Goyal RS, Kumar CS, Nigam S. Promoting sexual health through dialogue between men and women within social networks. Unpublished paper. Indian Institute of Health Management Research, 1998.
34.
Ramasubban R. Patriarchy and the risks of STD and HIV transmission to women. In: Das Gupta M, Chen LC, Krishnan TN, editors. Women’s health in India—risk and vulnerabilities. Bombay: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 212–41.
35.
Bloom SS, Singh KK & Suchindran CM. The effect of couple communication on the probability of husbands’ extramarital sex in North India. XV International AIDS Conference 2004, Bangkok: 2004, 11–16 July (abstract no. WePeD6300).
36.
Sivaram S, Johnson S, Bentley ME, et al. Sexual health promotion in Chennai, India: key role of communication among social networks. Heal Promot Int. 2005;20(4):327–33.CrossRef
37.
Collumbien N, Das B, Hawkes N. Male sexual debut in Orissa, India: context, partners and differentials. Asia-Pac Popul J. 2001;16:211–24.
38.
Harman JJ, Amico KR. The relationship-oriented information–motivation–behavioral skills model: a multilevel structural equation model among dyads. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(2):173–84.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Orengo-Aguayo R, Perez-Jimenez D. Impact of relationship dynamics and gender roles in the protection of HIV discordant heterosexual couples: an exploratory study in the Puerto Rican context. P R Health Sci J. 2009;28(1):30–9.PubMed
40.
Perez-Jimenez D, Seal DW, Serrano-Garcia I. Barriers and facilitators of HIV prevention with heterosexual Latino couples: beliefs of four stakeholder groups. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2009;15(1):11–7.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Persson A. Sero-silence and sero-sharing: managing HIV in serodiscordant heterosexual relationships. AIDS Care. 2008;20(4):503–6.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Eaton LA, West TV, Kenny DA, Kalichman SC. HIV Transmission risk among HIV seroconcordant and serodiscordant couples: dyadic processes of partner selection. AIDS Behav. 2009;13:185–95.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Montgomery CM, Lees S, Stadler J, et al. The role of partnership dynamics in determining the acceptability of condoms and microbicides. AIDS Care. 2008;20(6):733–40.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Jones DL, Weiss SM, Bhat GJ, Feldman DA, Bwalya V, Budash D. A sexual barrier intervention for HIV+/− Zambian women: acceptability and use of vaginal chemical barriers. J Multicult Nurs Heal. 2004;10(1):27–33.
45.
Jones D, Chitalu N, Ndubani P, et al. Sexual risk reduction among Zambian couples. SAHARA. 2009;6:69–75.CrossRef
46.
Straus M, Hamby S. The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales: development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues. 1996;17(3):283–316.CrossRef
47.
Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92–100.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Carver C, Scheier M, Weintraub JD. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1989;56:267–83.CrossRef
49.
Cooper C, Katona C, Livingston G. Validity and reliability of the Brief COPE in carers of people with dementia: the LASER-AD Study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196(11):838–43.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.CrossRef
51.
DeVellis RF. Scale development. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1991.
52.
Rust J, Golombok S. Modern psychometrics: the science of psychological assessment. London & New York: Routledge; 1989.
53.
Cruess S, Antoni MH, Hayes A, et al. Changes in mood and depressive symptoms and related change processes during cognitive behavioral stress management in HIV-infected men. Cogn Ther Res. 2002;26:373–92.CrossRef
54.
Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery D. Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press; 1979.
55.
Kalichman SC. HIV–AIDS: prevalence predictors, and emerging clinical interventions. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2000;7:32–47.CrossRef
56.
Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, editors. Action control: from cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985. p. 11–39.
57.
Albarracin D, Johnson BT, Fishbein M, Muellerleile PA. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2001;127:142–61.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Stein Z. Every woman deserves to know every method. Am J Public Health. 1998;85:1487.
59.
Gollub E, French P, Latka M, et al. (1996). The women’s safer sex hierarchy. International Conference on AIDS, 7–12 July, 11:1, 52 (abstract no. Mo.D.583).
60.
Baucom DH, Epstein N. Cognitive behavioral marital therapy. New York: Bruner/Mazel; 1990.
61.
Quina K. Sexual communication in relationships: when words speak louder than actions. Sex Roles. 2000;42(7–8):523–49.CrossRef
62.
Edelheit JA. A moral voice in response to the pandemic of HIV/AIDS in India. Presented at St. Cloud State University and Living India Conference May 26–27: 2005, Hyderabad, AP.
63.
Noar SM. Sexual negotiation and the influence of gender and power in heterosexually active men and women. Diss Abstr Int: Sect B, Sci Eng. 2002;62(9-B):4277.
64.
Frei JR, Shaver PR. Respect in close relationships: prototype definition, self-report assessment, and initial correlates. Pers Relat. 2002;9:121–39.CrossRef
65.
Gottman JM. The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: a longitudinal view of five types of couples. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;61(1):6–15.
66.
67.
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, Goldstein MG, Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Fiore C, Harlow LL, Redding CA, Rosenbloom D, Rossi SR. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Heal Psychol. 1994;13:39–46.CrossRef
68.
Population and development. Programme of Action adopted at International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo 5-13 September 1994. Vol. 1 New York, United Nations, 1995.
Metadata
Title
Reducing Sexual Risk Behavior Among High-Risk Couples in Northern India
Authors
Deborah Jones
Rashmi Bagga
Ritu Nehra
Deepika
Sunil Sethi
Kamini Walia
Mahendra Kumar
Olga Villar-Loubet
Maria Lopez
Stephen M. Weiss
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Electronic ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-012-9235-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 3/2013 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Evaluation of a Cognitive–Behavioral Pain Management Program for Children with Chronic Abdominal Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study

OriginalPaper

Influence of Self-Efficacy on Compliance to Workplace Exercise

OriginalPaper

Effect of the Interaction Between Employment Level and Psychosocial Work Environment on Insomnia in Male Japanese Public Service Workers

OriginalPaper

Association of Multimodal Treatment-Induced Improvements in Stress, Exercise Volume, Nutrition, and Weight with Improved Blood Pressure in Severely Obese Women

OriginalPaper

Effect of a Telephone-Delivered Coronary Heart Disease Secondary Prevention Program (ProActive Heart) on Quality of Life and Health Behaviours: Primary Outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial

OriginalPaper

Patient Experiences of a Theory-Based Lifestyle-Focused Group Treatment in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases and Type 2 Diabetes