Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Radiation Oncology 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Research

Reducing radiation dermatitis during ongoing radiation therapy: an innovative film-forming wound dressing

Authors: Amparo Quilis, Jaime Martín, Concepción Rodríguez, Purificación Sánchez, Juan Luis Ribes

Published in: Journal of Radiation Oncology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This multicenter study focuses on the use of a film-forming wound dressing in the form of a gel that can be applied directly to the area affected by radiation dermatitis, especially after skin breakdown. The primary objective of the study was to validate the efficacy of an innovative film-forming wound dressing used as monotherapy in the treatment of radiation dermatitis in patients with RTOG score 2.5 (± 0.5) confirmed by the investigator.

Methods

Fifty-four patients undergoing radiation therapy for different cancer types and developing radiation dermatitis were recruited in the study; they were treated with the film-forming wound dressing when reaching an RTOG score of 2.5 (± 0.5). The evaluation of radiation dermatitis during ongoing radiation therapy was performed using the RISRAS, which includes investigator-assessed items (erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation, necrosis) and patient-assessed items (pain, itch, burning sensation, affection of daily activities).

Results

The following study shows a statistically significant clinical improvement (p < 0.05) of the RISRAS score (− 16.9%), as well as of specific clinical outcomes, such as erythema (− 20.6%), pain (− 20.5%), itch (− 22.2%), and burning sensation (−24.7%), after the treatment with the film-forming wound dressing during ongoing radiation therapy. Other radiation dermatitis markers, such as inflammation (− 28.9%) and hydration (26.0%), appeared to be significantly influenced.

Conclusion

The use of the innovative film-forming wound dressing for radiation dermatitis treatment shows first time evidence of improving the RISRAS score during ongoing radiation therapy, showing major improvements in patients’ quality of life.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Naylor W, Mallett J (2001) Management of acute radiotherapy induced skin reactions: a literature review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 5(4):221–233CrossRefPubMed Naylor W, Mallett J (2001) Management of acute radiotherapy induced skin reactions: a literature review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 5(4):221–233CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Porock D, Kristjanson L (1999) Skin reactions during radiotherapy for breast cancer: the use and impact of topical agents and dressings. Eur J Cancer Care 8(3):143–153CrossRef Porock D, Kristjanson L (1999) Skin reactions during radiotherapy for breast cancer: the use and impact of topical agents and dressings. Eur J Cancer Care 8(3):143–153CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF (1995) Toxicity criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(5):1341–1346CrossRefPubMed Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF (1995) Toxicity criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(5):1341–1346CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Noble-Adams R (1999) Radiation-induced skin reactions 3: evaluating the RISRAS. Br J Nurs 8(19):1305–1312CrossRefPubMed Noble-Adams R (1999) Radiation-induced skin reactions 3: evaluating the RISRAS. Br J Nurs 8(19):1305–1312CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Harris R. (2011) Summary of interventions for acute radiotherapy-induced skin reactions in cancer patients: a clinical guideline recommended for use by The Society and College of Radiographers. Society of Radiographers (http://www.sor.org). 1–5 Harris R. (2011) Summary of interventions for acute radiotherapy-induced skin reactions in cancer patients: a clinical guideline recommended for use by The Society and College of Radiographers. Society of Radiographers (http://​www.​sor.​org). 1–5
6.
go back to reference Trueman E (2015 Apr 1) Management of radiotherapy-induced skin reactions. Int J Palliat Nurs 21(4):187–192CrossRefPubMed Trueman E (2015 Apr 1) Management of radiotherapy-induced skin reactions. Int J Palliat Nurs 21(4):187–192CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bernier J, Bonner J, Vermorken JB, Bensadoun RJ, Dummer R, Giralt J, Kornek G, Hartley A, Mesia R, Robert C, Segaert S, Ang KK (2008) Consensus guidelines for the management of radiation dermatitis and coexisting acne-like rash in patients receiving radiotherapy plus EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol 19(1):142–149CrossRefPubMed Bernier J, Bonner J, Vermorken JB, Bensadoun RJ, Dummer R, Giralt J, Kornek G, Hartley A, Mesia R, Robert C, Segaert S, Ang KK (2008) Consensus guidelines for the management of radiation dermatitis and coexisting acne-like rash in patients receiving radiotherapy plus EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol 19(1):142–149CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Herst PM, Bennett NC, Sutherland AE, Peszynski RI, Paterson DB, Jasperse ML (2014) Prophylactic use of Mepitel Film prevents radiation-induced moist desquamation in an intra-patient randomised controlled clinical trial of 78 breast cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 110(1):137–143CrossRefPubMed Herst PM, Bennett NC, Sutherland AE, Peszynski RI, Paterson DB, Jasperse ML (2014) Prophylactic use of Mepitel Film prevents radiation-induced moist desquamation in an intra-patient randomised controlled clinical trial of 78 breast cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 110(1):137–143CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kedge EM (2009) A systematic review to investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for moist desquamation in radiotherapy patients. Radiography 15(3):247–257CrossRef Kedge EM (2009) A systematic review to investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for moist desquamation in radiotherapy patients. Radiography 15(3):247–257CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hymes SR, Strom EA, Fife C (2006) Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol 54(1):28–46CrossRefPubMed Hymes SR, Strom EA, Fife C (2006) Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol 54(1):28–46CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Yarbro CH, Wujcik D, Gobel BH.(2011) Cancer nursing: principles and practice. Jones & Bartlett Publishers Yarbro CH, Wujcik D, Gobel BH.(2011) Cancer nursing: principles and practice. Jones & Bartlett Publishers
12.
go back to reference Ohri N, Rapkin BD, Guha C, Kalnicki S, Garg M (2016) Radiation therapy noncompliance and clinical outcomes in an urban academic cancer center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95(2):563–570CrossRefPubMed Ohri N, Rapkin BD, Guha C, Kalnicki S, Garg M (2016) Radiation therapy noncompliance and clinical outcomes in an urban academic cancer center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95(2):563–570CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reducing radiation dermatitis during ongoing radiation therapy: an innovative film-forming wound dressing
Authors
Amparo Quilis
Jaime Martín
Concepción Rodríguez
Purificación Sánchez
Juan Luis Ribes
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Radiation Oncology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1948-7894
Electronic ISSN: 1948-7908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-018-0356-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Radiation Oncology 3/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine