Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 11/2018

01-11-2018 | Original Article

Rectal trauma injuries: outcomes from the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank

Authors: K. J. Gash, K. Suradkar, R. P. Kiran

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a  lack of general consensus and a little published data regarding the management of trauma-related rectal injuries and outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the surgical management and corresponding outcomes for this patient cohort, using a nationwide trauma database.

Methods

Rectal injuries and procedures performed over a 2-year period (2013 and 2014) were identified through ICD-9 clinical modification codes, from the United States National Trauma Data Bank. Patient factors, management variables, and outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Of 1.7 million patients, 1472 (0.1%) sustained a rectal injury; 81% male, median age 30 years (range 16–89 years) and 60% due to penetrating trauma. Seven hundred and seventy-eight (52.8%) had an isolated extraperitoneal injury and 694 (47.2%) had isolated Intraperitoneal or combined intra- and extraperitoneal injuries. Overall, 726 patients (49.3%) underwent fecal diversion. Injuries following blunt trauma were associated with higher injury severity scores (ISS), lower stoma rates, longer hospital and intensive-care unit (ICU) stay, and higher mortality rates than penetrating trauma (all p ≤ 0.001). Patients with stoma formation had lower mortality than undiverted patients (8.6 vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001) despite a higher ISS and more intraperitoneal injuries, but longer hospital and ICU stay (all p ≤ 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, older age, higher ISS, intraperitoneal injury, and return to the ICU were independently associated with higher rates of mortality, while stoma formation was associated with a lower mortality rate. For isolated extraperitoneal rectal injuries, 494 patients (63.5%) were managed by resection/repair without stoma and had significantly lower overall postoperative morbidity rates (12.7 vs. 30.2%, p = 0.009) and shorter hospital stay (14 vs. 23 days, p < 0.001), than those who underwent resection/repair + stoma (n = 284; 36.5%), despite no significant difference in ISS (29 vs. 27, p = 0.780). There was no significant difference in mortality.

Conclusions

Our results showed that trauma-related rectal injuries are rare and there is wide variation in their management. These data support a low threshold for stoma formation in patients with intraperitoneal or combined injuries, while suggesting that isolated extraperitoneal defects may be safely managed without fecal diversion.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hefny AF, Al-Ashaal YI, Bani-Hashem AM, Abu-Zidan FM (2010) Seatbelt syndrome associated with an isolated rectal injury: case report. World J Emerg Surg 5:4CrossRef Hefny AF, Al-Ashaal YI, Bani-Hashem AM, Abu-Zidan FM (2010) Seatbelt syndrome associated with an isolated rectal injury: case report. World J Emerg Surg 5:4CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Carrillo EH, Somberg LB, Ceballos CE et al (1996) Blunt traumatic injuries to the colon and rectum. J Am Coll Surg 183:548–552PubMed Carrillo EH, Somberg LB, Ceballos CE et al (1996) Blunt traumatic injuries to the colon and rectum. J Am Coll Surg 183:548–552PubMed
3.
go back to reference Maxwell RA, Fabian TC (2003) Current management of colon trauma. World J Surg 27:632–639CrossRef Maxwell RA, Fabian TC (2003) Current management of colon trauma. World J Surg 27:632–639CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Steele SR, Maykel JA, Johnson EK (2011) Traumatic injury of the colon and rectum: the evidence vs dogma. Dis Colon Rectum 54(9):1184–1201CrossRef Steele SR, Maykel JA, Johnson EK (2011) Traumatic injury of the colon and rectum: the evidence vs dogma. Dis Colon Rectum 54(9):1184–1201CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hatch Q, Causey M, Martin M et al (2013) Outcomes after colon trauma in the 21st century: an analysis of the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank. Surgery 154(2):397–403CrossRef Hatch Q, Causey M, Martin M et al (2013) Outcomes after colon trauma in the 21st century: an analysis of the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank. Surgery 154(2):397–403CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bosarge PL, Como JJ, Fox N et al (2016) Management of penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries: An eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80(3):546–551CrossRef Bosarge PL, Como JJ, Fox N et al (2016) Management of penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries: An eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80(3):546–551CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB (1974) The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14(3):187–196CrossRef Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB (1974) The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14(3):187–196CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Copes WS, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Keast SL, Bain LW (1988) The injury severity score revisited. J Trauma 28(1):69–77CrossRef Copes WS, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Keast SL, Bain LW (1988) The injury severity score revisited. J Trauma 28(1):69–77CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wallace CMG (1917) A study of 1200 cases of gunshot wounds of the abdomen. Br J Surg 4:679–743CrossRef Wallace CMG (1917) A study of 1200 cases of gunshot wounds of the abdomen. Br J Surg 4:679–743CrossRef
13.
go back to reference McGrath V, Fabian TC, Croce MA, Minard G, Pritchard FE (1998) Rectal trauma: management based on anatomic distinctions. Am Surg 64(12):1136–1141PubMed McGrath V, Fabian TC, Croce MA, Minard G, Pritchard FE (1998) Rectal trauma: management based on anatomic distinctions. Am Surg 64(12):1136–1141PubMed
14.
go back to reference Taylor ER, Thompson JE (1948) The early treatment, and results thereof, of injuries of the colon and rectum, with 70 additional cases. J Am Med Assoc 138(1):209–228PubMed Taylor ER, Thompson JE (1948) The early treatment, and results thereof, of injuries of the colon and rectum, with 70 additional cases. J Am Med Assoc 138(1):209–228PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bosarge PL, Como JJ, Fox N, Falck-Ytter Y, Haut ER, Dorion HA, Patel NJ, Rushing A, Raff LA, McDonald AA, Robinson BR, McGwin G Jr, Gonzalez RP (2016) Management of penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80(3):546–551CrossRef Bosarge PL, Como JJ, Fox N, Falck-Ytter Y, Haut ER, Dorion HA, Patel NJ, Rushing A, Raff LA, McDonald AA, Robinson BR, McGwin G Jr, Gonzalez RP (2016) Management of penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80(3):546–551CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Navsaria PH, Edu S, Nicol AJ (2007 Jun) Civilian extraperitoneal rectal gunshot wounds: surgical management made simpler. World J Surg 31(6):1345–1351CrossRef Navsaria PH, Edu S, Nicol AJ (2007 Jun) Civilian extraperitoneal rectal gunshot wounds: surgical management made simpler. World J Surg 31(6):1345–1351CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gonzalez RP, Phelan H 3rd, Hassan M, Ellis CN, Rodning CB (2006 Oct) Is fecal diversion necessary for nondestructive penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries? J Trauma 61(4):815–819. 18CrossRef Gonzalez RP, Phelan H 3rd, Hassan M, Ellis CN, Rodning CB (2006 Oct) Is fecal diversion necessary for nondestructive penetrating extraperitoneal rectal injuries? J Trauma 61(4):815–819. 18CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Levine JH, Longo WE, Pruitt C, Mazuski JE, Shapiro MJ, Durham RM (1996 Nov) Management of selected rectal injuries by primary repair. Am J Surg 172(5):575–578CrossRef Levine JH, Longo WE, Pruitt C, Mazuski JE, Shapiro MJ, Durham RM (1996 Nov) Management of selected rectal injuries by primary repair. Am J Surg 172(5):575–578CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Weinberg JA, Fabian TC, Magnotti LJ, Minard G, Bee TK, Edwards N, Claridge JA, Croce MA (2006 Mar) Penetrating rectal trauma: management by anatomic distinction improves outcome. J Trauma 60(3):508–513CrossRef Weinberg JA, Fabian TC, Magnotti LJ, Minard G, Bee TK, Edwards N, Claridge JA, Croce MA (2006 Mar) Penetrating rectal trauma: management by anatomic distinction improves outcome. J Trauma 60(3):508–513CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gonzalez RP, Turk B (2002) Surgical options in colorectal injuries. Scand J Surg 91:87–91CrossRef Gonzalez RP, Turk B (2002) Surgical options in colorectal injuries. Scand J Surg 91:87–91CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Miller BJ, Schache DJ (1996) Colorectal injury: where do we stand with repair? ANZ J Surg 66:348–352CrossRef Miller BJ, Schache DJ (1996) Colorectal injury: where do we stand with repair? ANZ J Surg 66:348–352CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Merlino JI, Reynolds HL (2004) Management of rectal injuries. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 15:70–79CrossRef Merlino JI, Reynolds HL (2004) Management of rectal injuries. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 15:70–79CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cleary RK, Pomerantz RA, Lampman RM (2006) Colon and rectal injuries. Dis Colon Rectum 49(8):1203–1222CrossRef Cleary RK, Pomerantz RA, Lampman RM (2006) Colon and rectal injuries. Dis Colon Rectum 49(8):1203–1222CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Burch JM, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL (1989) Colstoma and drainage for civilian rectal injuries: is that all? Ann Surg 209(5):600–611CrossRef Burch JM, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL (1989) Colstoma and drainage for civilian rectal injuries: is that all? Ann Surg 209(5):600–611CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gonzalez RP, Falimirski ME, Holevar MR (1998) The role of presacral drainage in the management of penetrating rectal injuries. J Trauma 45(4):656–661CrossRef Gonzalez RP, Falimirski ME, Holevar MR (1998) The role of presacral drainage in the management of penetrating rectal injuries. J Trauma 45(4):656–661CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Haider AH, Saleem T, Leow JJ et al (2012 May) Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact? J Am Coll Surg 214(5):756–768CrossRef Haider AH, Saleem T, Leow JJ et al (2012 May) Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact? J Am Coll Surg 214(5):756–768CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rectal trauma injuries: outcomes from the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank
Authors
K. J. Gash
K. Suradkar
R. P. Kiran
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1856-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

Techniques in Coloproctology 11/2018 Go to the issue