Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Techniques in Coloproctology
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Rectal Cancer | Video Forum

The third arm: the surgeon’s friend in the management of intraoperative complications in robotic-assisted rectal surgery

Authors: M. Milone, M. Manigrasso, M. Gandini, S. Aprea, G. D. De Palma

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

Different studies have shown that robotic-assisted rectal surgery compared to traditional laparoscopic surgery is associated with less blood loss and a better preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves that is fundamental in rectal surgery to avoid anterior resection syndrome [1, 2]. …
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Liu WH, Yan PJ, Hu DP, Jin PH, Lv YC, Liu R, Yang XF, Yang KH, Guo TK (2019) Short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a cohort study. Am Surg 85(3):294–302PubMed
2.
Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(16):1569–1580CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Wen-Xi Wu, Sun Yao-Min, Hua Yi-Bin, Shen Li-Zong (2004) Laparoscopic versus conventional open resection of rectal carcinoma: a clinical comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 10(8):1167–1170CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The third arm: the surgeon’s friend in the management of intraoperative complications in robotic-assisted rectal surgery
Authors
M. Milone
M. Manigrasso
M. Gandini
S. Aprea
G. D. De Palma
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02067-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Techniques in Coloproctology 10/2019 Go to the issue

Correction

Correction to: Pelvic fat volume reduction with preoperative very low energy diet (VLED): implications for rectal cancer surgery in the obese

Technical Note

Rectal advancement flap plus adipose lipofilling (RAFAL) for the treatment of rectourethral fistulas after radical prostatectomy

Original Article

Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula: long-term data on continence and patient satisfaction

Technical Note

Fissurectomy with vertical non-full-thickness sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure

Original Article

A National study on the adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population: current state and value proposition

Original Article

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) in the lower gastrointestinal tract