Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2021

01-04-2021 | Rectal Cancer | Original Article

Oncological outcomes and stoma-free survival following TaTME, a prospective cohort study

Authors: S. Hallam, F. Ahmed, N. Gouvas, S. Pandey, D. Nicol

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Transanal TME (TaTME) was introduced to improve access to the pelvis in difficult cases (male sex, obesity and mid to low rectal cancers) and reduce the risk of anastomotic leak by avoiding cross stapling. In April 2018 the Norwegian hospital to whom all local; recurrences for rectal cancer are referred reported an unexpected rise in early multifocal local recurrences of 9.5% following TaTME compared with 3.4% following conventional TME leading to a nationwide moratorium on the procedure and ending, in an editorial published on the British Journal of Surgery in August 2020, by saying that other countries should consider the issue in the context of local practices and results. There are limited data concerning oncological outcomes of TaTME compared to conventional TME. The aim of this study was to report perioperative and oncological outcomes for patients with rectal cancer treated with TaTME in a high-volume, experienced UK centre.

Methods

From January 2015 to January 2020 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed rectal cancer having TaTME at Worcestershire Royal Hospital NHS were prospectively entered into an online international registry. Patients were followed according to local protocol with clinical examination, tumour markers, endoscopy and radiology.

Results

Seventy patients underwent TaTME for rectal cancer. The median distance of the tumour from the anorectal junction was 4 cm (IQR 2–5). The mesorectal margin was involved in 20 (1%) patients, all of whom received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Overall survival was 94% at a median follow-up of 15 months (IQR 9–31 months). Distant recurrence occurred in 12 (17%) of patients at a median of 14 months (IQR 10–17 months). The 18-month stoma-free survival rate was 66%.

Conclusions

A local recurrence rate of 5.7% supports the oncological safety of TaTME for rectal cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aitken RJ (1996) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83(2):214–216PubMed Aitken RJ (1996) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83(2):214–216PubMed
4.
go back to reference Boyle E, Braun M, Hill J, Kuryba A, Meulen J, Walker K, Eaves E, Roe A, Whitehead A (2018) National bowel cancer audit, annual report 2018 Boyle E, Braun M, Hill J, Kuryba A, Meulen J, Walker K, Eaves E, Roe A, Whitehead A (2018) National bowel cancer audit, annual report 2018
8.
go back to reference Corp I (Released 2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. IBM Corp Corp I (Released 2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. IBM Corp
9.
go back to reference Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181(4):335–346PubMed Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181(4):335–346PubMed
10.
go back to reference Fearnhead NS, Acheson AG, Brown SR, Hancock L, Harikrishnan A, Kelly SB, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Sagar PM, Siddiqi S, Walsh CJ, Wheeler JMD, Abercrombie JF, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain IAE, Gitting It Right First Time (GIRFT) (2020) The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision. Colorectal Dis 22(7):745–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fearnhead NS, Acheson AG, Brown SR, Hancock L, Harikrishnan A, Kelly SB, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Sagar PM, Siddiqi S, Walsh CJ, Wheeler JMD, Abercrombie JF, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain IAE, Gitting It Right First Time (GIRFT) (2020) The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision. Colorectal Dis 22(7):745–748. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​codi.​15143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, Peters WR, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren SM, Pisters PW, Nelson H (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1346–1355. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, Peters WR, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren SM, Pisters PW, Nelson H (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1346–1355. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2015.​10529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George VV, Abbas MA, Peters WR, Maun DC, Chang GJ, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch MG, Wexner SD, Whiteford MH, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin DA, Larson DW, Marcello PW, Posner MC, Read TE, Monson JRT, Wren SM, Pisters PWT, Nelson H (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269(4):589–595. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George VV, Abbas MA, Peters WR, Maun DC, Chang GJ, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch MG, Wexner SD, Whiteford MH, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin DA, Larson DW, Marcello PW, Posner MC, Read TE, Monson JRT, Wren SM, Pisters PWT, Nelson H (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269(4):589–595. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000003002​CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kang L, Chen YG, Zhang H, Zhang HY, Lin GL, Yang YC, Chen WH, Luo SL, Chen N, Tong WD, Shen ZL, Xiong DH, Xiao Y, Zhang ZT, Wang JP (2020) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicentric cohort study. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 8(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goz049CrossRef Kang L, Chen YG, Zhang H, Zhang HY, Lin GL, Yang YC, Chen WH, Luo SL, Chen N, Tong WD, Shen ZL, Xiong DH, Xiao Y, Zhang ZT, Wang JP (2020) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicentric cohort study. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 8(1):36–41. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​gastro/​goz049CrossRef
17.
go back to reference de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, Tasende MM, Fernández M, Delgado S, Sylla P, Martínez-Palli G (2013) Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)—short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 27(9):3165–3172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2872-0CrossRefPubMed de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, Tasende MM, Fernández M, Delgado S, Sylla P, Martínez-Palli G (2013) Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)—short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 27(9):3165–3172. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-013-2872-0CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics (2016) Cancer Registration Statistics, England: 2014. UK Office for National Statistics (2016) Cancer Registration Statistics, England: 2014. UK
26.
go back to reference Roodbeen SX, Penna M, Mackenzie H, Kusters M, Slater A, Jones OM, Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Cunningham C, Hompes R (2019) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc 33(8):2459–2467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4CrossRefPubMed Roodbeen SX, Penna M, Mackenzie H, Kusters M, Slater A, Jones OM, Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Cunningham C, Hompes R (2019) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc 33(8):2459–2467. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-018-6530-4CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Roodbeen SX, Spinelli A, Bemelman WA, Di Candido F, Cardepont M, Denost Q, D’Hoore A, Houben B, Knol JJ, Martín-Pérez B, Rullier E, Sands D, Setton I, Van de Steen K, Tanis PJ, Wexner SD, Hompes R, Wolthuis AM (2020) Local recurrence after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003757CrossRef Roodbeen SX, Spinelli A, Bemelman WA, Di Candido F, Cardepont M, Denost Q, D’Hoore A, Houben B, Knol JJ, Martín-Pérez B, Rullier E, Sands D, Setton I, Van de Steen K, Tanis PJ, Wexner SD, Hompes R, Wolthuis AM (2020) Local recurrence after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000003757​CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Stevenson ARL, Solomon MJ, Brown CSB, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, Investigators AG-ITGAA (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted resection or open resection for rectal cancer: the Australasian laparoscopic cancer of the rectum randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 269(4):596–602. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003021CrossRefPubMed Stevenson ARL, Solomon MJ, Brown CSB, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, Investigators AG-ITGAA (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted resection or open resection for rectal cancer: the Australasian laparoscopic cancer of the rectum randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 269(4):596–602. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000003021​CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Davies L, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, Investigators A (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1356–1363. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.12009CrossRefPubMed Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Davies L, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, Investigators A (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1356–1363. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2015.​12009CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Wasmuth HH, Faerden AE, Myklebust T, Pfeffer F, Norderval S, Riis R, Olsen OC, Lambrecht JR, Kørner H, Larsen SG, Forsmo HM, Baekkelund O, Lavik S, Knapp JC, Sjo O, Rashid G, Norwegian TaTME Collaborative Group obotNCCG (2020) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway. Br J Surg 107(1): 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11459 Wasmuth HH, Faerden AE, Myklebust T, Pfeffer F, Norderval S, Riis R, Olsen OC, Lambrecht JR, Kørner H, Larsen SG, Forsmo HM, Baekkelund O, Lavik S, Knapp JC, Sjo O, Rashid G, Norwegian TaTME Collaborative Group obotNCCG (2020) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway. Br J Surg 107(1): 121–130. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​bjs.​11459
Metadata
Title
Oncological outcomes and stoma-free survival following TaTME, a prospective cohort study
Authors
S. Hallam
F. Ahmed
N. Gouvas
S. Pandey
D. Nicol
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02390-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2021 Go to the issue