Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2024

24-11-2023 | Rectal Cancer | Hollow Organ GI

Do treated rectal tumors appear differently on MRI after chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy?

Authors: Yu Shen, Yanqiong Wen, Liang Bi, Xuyang Yang, Xiaoling Gong, Xiangbing Deng, Wenjian Meng, Ziqiang Wang

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Increasing studies have focused on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in rectal cancer. However, few studies explored the differences in radiographic variation between patients treated with NCT and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT).

Methods

Stage II/III rectal cancer patients from March 2016 to December 2019 meeting the criteria treated with NCRT or NCT were included. MRI features, including tumor location, longitudinal length, DWI signal, MRI tumor regression grade (mrTRG), and radiomic texture features, before and after neoadjuvant treatments were reviewed.

Results

116 patients with NCRT and 61 with NCT were analyzed. Among these patients, 46 patients in the NCRT group and 18 in the NCT group were responders with pathological TRG0-1. Within these responders, the mean tumor longitudinal length regression rate (TLRR) of the NCT group was 60.08 ± 11.17%, which was significantly higher than the 50.73 ± 15.28% of the NCRT group (p = 0.010). The proportion of high signal in the DWI image after NCT was higher than that of the NCRT group (88.89% vs 50.00%, p = 0.004). NCT responders had significantly higher median change rates than those of NCRT responders in 11 radiomic features, especially those shape features.

Conclusion

MRI images change differently between responders treated with NCRT and those with NCT in rectal cancer. The tumor volumetry and some radiomic features change more obviously in NCT responders, and the tumor signal changes more obviously in NCRT responders. During the evaluation of the response of the tumor to the neoadjuvant treatments, images of patients should be treated differently.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Deng Y, Chi P, Lan P, et al. (2016) Modified FOLFOX6 With or Without Radiation Versus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin With Radiation in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Initial Results of the Chinese FOWARC Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Three-Arm Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 3427:3300-7 https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.66.6198CrossRef Deng Y, Chi P, Lan P, et al. (2016) Modified FOLFOX6 With or Without Radiation Versus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin With Radiation in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Initial Results of the Chinese FOWARC Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Three-Arm Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 3427:3300-7 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​jco.​2016.​66.​6198CrossRef
17.
32.
go back to reference Ding PR, Wang XZ, Li YF, et al. (2021) LBA22 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine versus chemoradiation with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer with uninvolved mesorectal fascia (CONVERT): Initial results of a multicenter randomised, open-label, phase III trial. Annals of Oncology 32:S1296 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.2096CrossRef Ding PR, Wang XZ, Li YF, et al. (2021) LBA22 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine versus chemoradiation with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer with uninvolved mesorectal fascia (CONVERT): Initial results of a multicenter randomised, open-label, phase III trial. Annals of Oncology 32:S1296 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​annonc.​2021.​08.​2096CrossRef
33.
41.
go back to reference Shen Y, Shi W, Huang C, et al. (2023) Comparison of the pathological response to 2 or 4 cycles of neoadjuvant CAPOX in II/III rectal cancer patients with low/intermediate risks: study protocol for a prospective, non-inferior, randomized control trial (COPEC trial). Trials 241:397 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07405-xCrossRef Shen Y, Shi W, Huang C, et al. (2023) Comparison of the pathological response to 2 or 4 cycles of neoadjuvant CAPOX in II/III rectal cancer patients with low/intermediate risks: study protocol for a prospective, non-inferior, randomized control trial (COPEC trial). Trials 241:397 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13063-023-07405-xCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Do treated rectal tumors appear differently on MRI after chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy?
Authors
Yu Shen
Yanqiong Wen
Liang Bi
Xuyang Yang
Xiaoling Gong
Xiangbing Deng
Wenjian Meng
Ziqiang Wang
Publication date
24-11-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-04115-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

Abdominal Radiology 3/2024 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine