Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Reconstruction of tooth-bearing portion of mandible using polyglactin 910 sutures for internal fixation in the third-world: functional and cosmetic outcome

Authors: Bayo Aluko-Olokun, Ademola A. Olaitan, Oluseun A. Aluko-Olokun

Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study analyzed the cosmetic and functional outcome of cases involving reconstruction of tooth-bearing portion of the lower jaw, using a polyglactin 910 suture for fixation.

Patients and method

This prospective intervention study documented the treatment outcome in 25 consecutive adult patients, who underwent immediate mandibular reconstruction following segmental resection of tooth-bearing portion of mandible. Cortico-cancellous bone graft was taken from the inner table of iliac bone, sparing the crest. Use of post-surgical inter-maxillary fixation was avoided.

Results

Twenty-five patients were recruited for the study. Seventeen were males and eight were females. Their ages ranged from 18 to 50 years, with a mean of 30.0 years. Average length of grafted bone was 9.8 cm. Following surgery, all 25 (100%) patients were judged to have satisfactory facial symmetry. One (4.0 %) had altered dental occlusion. Twenty-five (100%) had satisfactory bone union. All of the patients claimed to masticate satisfactorily. Assessment was carried out at the last post-operative follow-up visit for each patient who ranged between 22 and 83 months.

Conclusion

Use of polyglactin 910 suture material for fixation in mandibular reconstruction following segmental resection of tooth-bearing portion has proven to be a cosmetic and functional success. It may serve as alternative for those among whom conventional treatment methods may be contraindicated. This method of bone fixation may serve as a reliable and much cheaper alternative in low-income countries.

Level of evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mosby (2009) Mosby's medical dictionary, 8th edn. Elsevier, U.S.A Mosby (2009) Mosby's medical dictionary, 8th edn. Elsevier, U.S.A
2.
go back to reference Nayak PK, Mahapatra AK (2007) Primary reconstruction of depressed skull fracture—the changing scenario. Indian J Neurotrauma 5(1):35–38CrossRef Nayak PK, Mahapatra AK (2007) Primary reconstruction of depressed skull fracture—the changing scenario. Indian J Neurotrauma 5(1):35–38CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Patel A, Yadav N, Gupte A et al (2012) Management of a complicated parasymphyseal fracture using biodegradable splinting material: two case reports. Int J Contempor Dent 3(1):24–29 Patel A, Yadav N, Gupte A et al (2012) Management of a complicated parasymphyseal fracture using biodegradable splinting material: two case reports. Int J Contempor Dent 3(1):24–29
4.
go back to reference Dunn DL (2007) Ethicon wound closure manual. Ethicon Inc. West, Somerville Dunn DL (2007) Ethicon wound closure manual. Ethicon Inc. West, Somerville
5.
go back to reference Fernandez R (2006) Fibula free flap in mandibular reconstruction. Atlas of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of N Am 14:143–150 Fernandez R (2006) Fibula free flap in mandibular reconstruction. Atlas of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of N Am 14:143–150
6.
go back to reference Verweij JP, Houppermans PN, Mensink G, van Merkesteyn JP (2014) Removal rate of bicortical screws and other osteosynthesis material after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a retrospective study of 251 patients and review of the literature. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(6):1532–1940 Verweij JP, Houppermans PN, Mensink G, van Merkesteyn JP (2014) Removal rate of bicortical screws and other osteosynthesis material after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a retrospective study of 251 patients and review of the literature. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(6):1532–1940
7.
go back to reference Schlieve T, Hull W, Miloro M, Kolokythas A (2015) Is immediate reconstruction of the mandible with non-vascularized bone graft following resection of benign pathology a viable treatment option? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:541–549CrossRefPubMed Schlieve T, Hull W, Miloro M, Kolokythas A (2015) Is immediate reconstruction of the mandible with non-vascularized bone graft following resection of benign pathology a viable treatment option? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:541–549CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Foster RD, Anthony JP, Sharma A, Pogrel MA (1999) Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular re- construction: an outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success. Head Neck 21(1):66–71CrossRefPubMed Foster RD, Anthony JP, Sharma A, Pogrel MA (1999) Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular re- construction: an outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success. Head Neck 21(1):66–71CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pogrel MA, Podlesh S, Anthony JP, Alexander J (1997) A comparison of vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55(11):1200–1206CrossRefPubMed Pogrel MA, Podlesh S, Anthony JP, Alexander J (1997) A comparison of vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55(11):1200–1206CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Obwegeser HL (1966) Simultaneous resection and reconstruction of parts of the mandible via the intraoral route in patients with and without gross infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 21(6):693–705CrossRefPubMed Obwegeser HL (1966) Simultaneous resection and reconstruction of parts of the mandible via the intraoral route in patients with and without gross infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 21(6):693–705CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference van Gemert JT, van Es RJ, Van Cann EM et al (2009) Nonvascularized bone grafts for segmental reconstruction of the mandible—a reappraisal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1446CrossRefPubMed van Gemert JT, van Es RJ, Van Cann EM et al (2009) Nonvascularized bone grafts for segmental reconstruction of the mandible—a reappraisal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1446CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shirani G, Arshad M, Mohammadi F (2007) Immediate reconstruction of a large mandibular defect of locally invasive benign lesions (a new method). Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 18(6):1422–1428CrossRefPubMed Shirani G, Arshad M, Mohammadi F (2007) Immediate reconstruction of a large mandibular defect of locally invasive benign lesions (a new method). Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 18(6):1422–1428CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Carlson ER, Marx RE (2006) The ameloblastoma: primary, curative surgical management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(3):484–494CrossRefPubMed Carlson ER, Marx RE (2006) The ameloblastoma: primary, curative surgical management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(3):484–494CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Goh BT, Lee S, Tideman H, Stoelinga PJ (2008) Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37(7):597–605CrossRefPubMed Goh BT, Lee S, Tideman H, Stoelinga PJ (2008) Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37(7):597–605CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ghassemi A, Ghassemi M, Riediger D, Hilgers RD, Gerressen M (2009) Comparison of donor-site engraftment after harvesting vascularized and nonvascularized iliac bone grafts. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 67(8):1589–1594. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.013 CrossRef Ghassemi A, Ghassemi M, Riediger D, Hilgers RD, Gerressen M (2009) Comparison of donor-site engraftment after harvesting vascularized and nonvascularized iliac bone grafts. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 67(8):1589–1594. doi:10.​1016/​j.​joms.​2009.​04.​013 CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chiapasco M, Colletti G, Romeo E, Zaniboni M, Brusati R (2008) Long-term results of mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts and oral implants after tumor resection. Clin Oral Implants Res 19(10):1074–1080CrossRefPubMed Chiapasco M, Colletti G, Romeo E, Zaniboni M, Brusati R (2008) Long-term results of mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts and oral implants after tumor resection. Clin Oral Implants Res 19(10):1074–1080CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Konstantinoviü VS, Todoroviü VS, Laziü VM (2013) Possibilities of reconstruction and implant-prosthetic rehabilitation following mandible resection. Vojnosanit Pregl 70(1):80–85. doi:10.2298/VSP1301080K CrossRef Konstantinoviü VS, Todoroviü VS, Laziü VM (2013) Possibilities of reconstruction and implant-prosthetic rehabilitation following mandible resection. Vojnosanit Pregl 70(1):80–85. doi:10.​2298/​VSP1301080K CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kadir MRA, Haron H, Kamsah N, Nordin N (2008) Miniplates Orientation for Fracture Fixation of the Mandibular Condyle. 4th Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering. In proceedings of International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, June 25–28, 2008; (21):438–441 Kadir MRA, Haron H, Kamsah N, Nordin N (2008) Miniplates Orientation for Fracture Fixation of the Mandibular Condyle. 4th Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering. In proceedings of International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, June 25–28, 2008; (21):438–441
19.
go back to reference Fox AJ, Kellman RM (2003) Mandibular angle fractures: two-miniplate fixation and complications. Arch Facial Plast Surg 5(6):464–469CrossRefPubMed Fox AJ, Kellman RM (2003) Mandibular angle fractures: two-miniplate fixation and complications. Arch Facial Plast Surg 5(6):464–469CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nakamura S, Takenoshita Y, Oka M (1994) Complications of miniplate osteosynthesis for mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(3):233–239CrossRefPubMed Nakamura S, Takenoshita Y, Oka M (1994) Complications of miniplate osteosynthesis for mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(3):233–239CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Springer IN, Wannike B, Warnke PH et al (2007) Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg 59:156–1628CrossRefPubMed Springer IN, Wannike B, Warnke PH et al (2007) Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg 59:156–1628CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Olaitan AA, Adekeye EO (2001) Reasons in seeking treatment in ameloblastoma of the jaws. West Indian Dent J 5(1):21–23.8 Olaitan AA, Adekeye EO (2001) Reasons in seeking treatment in ameloblastoma of the jaws. West Indian Dent J 5(1):21–23.8
24.
go back to reference Rosenberg A, Grätz KW, Sailer HF (1993) Should titanium miniplates be removed after bone healing is complete? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22(3):185–188CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg A, Grätz KW, Sailer HF (1993) Should titanium miniplates be removed after bone healing is complete? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22(3):185–188CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Byl S (2013) The state of healthcare in Africa: KPMG Africa health report 2012. KPMG Africa, Amsterdam Byl S (2013) The state of healthcare in Africa: KPMG Africa health report 2012. KPMG Africa, Amsterdam
Metadata
Title
Reconstruction of tooth-bearing portion of mandible using polyglactin 910 sutures for internal fixation in the third-world: functional and cosmetic outcome
Authors
Bayo Aluko-Olokun
Ademola A. Olaitan
Oluseun A. Aluko-Olokun
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Electronic ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-016-0589-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1/2017 Go to the issue