Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 1/2011

01-03-2011

Recommendations for Enhancing Clinical Trials Education: a Review of the Literature

Authors: Karen A. Stepan, Amy P. Gonzalez, Vivian S. Dorsey, Debra K. Frye, Nita D. Pyle, Regina F. Smith, Terry A. Throckmorton, Louise A. Villejo, Scott B. Cantor

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aims to apply the evidence-based practice (EBP) process to determine the factors that influence patients’ understanding of, participation in, and satisfaction with clinical trials, the informed consent process, and treatment decisions and to make recommendations for improving clinical trials education. Beginning with evidence retrieval, the authors identified key search terms and searched MEDLINE—Ovid, MEDLINE—PubMed, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature to identify articles published between July 2001 and July 2006 that highlighted clinical trials education. The articles were reviewed for clinical trials patient education information, clinician methods of communicating clinical trial information to patients, and patient satisfaction with the clinical trials process, including the informed consent process. As a result, practice changes were recommended for the patient/family, staff/community, and institution. From the literature review, 81 articles were identified. Recurring themes included decision-making, patient education, staff education, and pediatrics. Most articles focused on methods and strategies aimed at improving education at the patient/family, staff/community, and institutional levels. The issues surrounding clinical trial education are complex due to multiple variables interfering with poor patient understanding of, participation in, and satisfaction with clinical trial treatment decisions. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that clinicians involved in educating patients, families, staff, and communities about clinical trials have an awareness of and understanding for very complex issues.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aapro MS, Kohne C-H, Cohen HJ, Extermann M (2005) Never too old? Age should not be a barrier to enrollment in cancer clinical trials. Oncologist 10(3):198–204CrossRefPubMed Aapro MS, Kohne C-H, Cohen HJ, Extermann M (2005) Never too old? Age should not be a barrier to enrollment in cancer clinical trials. Oncologist 10(3):198–204CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Advani AS, Atkeson B, Brown CL, Peterson BL, Fish L, Johnson JL, Gockerman JP, Gautier M (2003) Barriers to the participation of African–American patients with cancer in clinical trials: a pilot study. Cancer 97(6):1499–1506CrossRefPubMed Advani AS, Atkeson B, Brown CL, Peterson BL, Fish L, Johnson JL, Gockerman JP, Gautier M (2003) Barriers to the participation of African–American patients with cancer in clinical trials: a pilot study. Cancer 97(6):1499–1506CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Agrawal M, Emanuel EJ (2003) Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies: reexamining the arguments and data. J Am Med Assoc 290(8):1075–1082CrossRef Agrawal M, Emanuel EJ (2003) Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies: reexamining the arguments and data. J Am Med Assoc 290(8):1075–1082CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Albrecht TL, Franks MM, Ruckdeschel JC (2005) Communication and informed consent. Curr Opin Oncol 17(4):336–339CrossRefPubMed Albrecht TL, Franks MM, Ruckdeschel JC (2005) Communication and informed consent. Curr Opin Oncol 17(4):336–339CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Albrecht TL, Ruckdeschel JC, Riddle DL, Blanchard CG, Penner LA, Coovert MD, Quinn G (2003) Communication and consumer decision making about cancer clinical trials. Patient Educ Couns 50(1):39–42PubMed Albrecht TL, Ruckdeschel JC, Riddle DL, Blanchard CG, Penner LA, Coovert MD, Quinn G (2003) Communication and consumer decision making about cancer clinical trials. Patient Educ Couns 50(1):39–42PubMed
6.
go back to reference Angiolillo AL, Simon C, Kodish E, Lange B, Noll RB, Ruccione K, Matloub Y (2004) Staged informed consent for a randomized clinical trial in childhood leukemia: impact on the consent. Pediatr Blood Cancer 42(5):433–437CrossRefPubMed Angiolillo AL, Simon C, Kodish E, Lange B, Noll RB, Ruccione K, Matloub Y (2004) Staged informed consent for a randomized clinical trial in childhood leukemia: impact on the consent. Pediatr Blood Cancer 42(5):433–437CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Avis NE, Smith KW, Link CL, Hortobagyi GN, Rivera E (2006) Factors associated with participation in breast cancer treatment clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 24(12):1860–1867CrossRefPubMed Avis NE, Smith KW, Link CL, Hortobagyi GN, Rivera E (2006) Factors associated with participation in breast cancer treatment clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 24(12):1860–1867CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Barrett R (2005) Quality of informed consent: measuring understanding among participants in oncology clinical trials. Oncol Nurs Forum 32(4):751–755CrossRefPubMed Barrett R (2005) Quality of informed consent: measuring understanding among participants in oncology clinical trials. Oncol Nurs Forum 32(4):751–755CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Beskow LM, Sandler RS, Millikan RC, Weinberger M (2005) Patient perspectives on research recruitment through cancer registries. Cancer Causes Control 16(10):1171–1185CrossRefPubMed Beskow LM, Sandler RS, Millikan RC, Weinberger M (2005) Patient perspectives on research recruitment through cancer registries. Cancer Causes Control 16(10):1171–1185CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Broome ME, Richards DJ (2003) The influence of relationships on children’s and adolescents’ participation in research. Nurs Res 52(3):191–197CrossRefPubMed Broome ME, Richards DJ (2003) The influence of relationships on children’s and adolescents’ participation in research. Nurs Res 52(3):191–197CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Brundage M, Leis A, Bezjak A, Feldman-Stewart D, Degner L, Velji K, Zetes-Zanatta L, Tu D, Ritvo P, Pater J (2003) Cancer patients’ preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: a qualitative study. Qual Life Res 12(4):395–404CrossRefPubMed Brundage M, Leis A, Bezjak A, Feldman-Stewart D, Degner L, Velji K, Zetes-Zanatta L, Tu D, Ritvo P, Pater J (2003) Cancer patients’ preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: a qualitative study. Qual Life Res 12(4):395–404CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Burhansstipanow L, Krebs LU, Bradley A, Gamito E, Osborn K, Dignan MB, Kaur JS (2003) Lessons learned while developing “Clinical Trials Education for Native Americans” curriculum. Cancer Control 1(5 Suppl):29–36 Burhansstipanow L, Krebs LU, Bradley A, Gamito E, Osborn K, Dignan MB, Kaur JS (2003) Lessons learned while developing “Clinical Trials Education for Native Americans” curriculum. Cancer Control 1(5 Suppl):29–36
13.
go back to reference Burnet K, Benson J, Earl H, Thornton H, Cox K, Purushotham AD (2004) A survey of breast cancer patients’ views on entry into several clinical studies. Eur J Cancer Care 13(1):32–35CrossRef Burnet K, Benson J, Earl H, Thornton H, Cox K, Purushotham AD (2004) A survey of breast cancer patients’ views on entry into several clinical studies. Eur J Cancer Care 13(1):32–35CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Casarett D, Karlawish J, Sankar P, Hirschman KB, Asch DA (2002) Obtaining informed consent for cancer pain research: do patients with advanced cancer and patients with chronic pain have different concerns? J Pain Symptom Manage 24(5):506–516CrossRefPubMed Casarett D, Karlawish J, Sankar P, Hirschman KB, Asch DA (2002) Obtaining informed consent for cancer pain research: do patients with advanced cancer and patients with chronic pain have different concerns? J Pain Symptom Manage 24(5):506–516CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chang SM, Barker FG, Schmidt MH, Sloan AE, Kasper R, Phillips L, Shih K, Hariharan S, Berger MS (2002) Clinical trial participation among patients enrolled in the Glioma Outcomes Project. Cancer 94(10):2681–2687CrossRefPubMed Chang SM, Barker FG, Schmidt MH, Sloan AE, Kasper R, Phillips L, Shih K, Hariharan S, Berger MS (2002) Clinical trial participation among patients enrolled in the Glioma Outcomes Project. Cancer 94(10):2681–2687CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Connolly NB, Schneider D, Hill AM (2004) Improving enrollment in cancer clinical trials. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(3):610–614CrossRefPubMed Connolly NB, Schneider D, Hill AM (2004) Improving enrollment in cancer clinical trials. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(3):610–614CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cox K (2002) Informed consent and decision making: patients’ experiences of the recruitment to phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials. Patient Educ Couns 46(1):31–38CrossRefPubMed Cox K (2002) Informed consent and decision making: patients’ experiences of the recruitment to phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials. Patient Educ Couns 46(1):31–38CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cox K, McGarry J (2003) Why patients don’t take part in cancer clinical trials: an overview of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care 12(2):114–122CrossRef Cox K, McGarry J (2003) Why patients don’t take part in cancer clinical trials: an overview of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care 12(2):114–122CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Coyne CA, Xu R, Raich P, Plomer K, Dignan M, Wenzel LB, Fairclough D, Habermann T, Schnell L, Quella S, Cella D (2003) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 21(5):836–842CrossRefPubMed Coyne CA, Xu R, Raich P, Plomer K, Dignan M, Wenzel LB, Fairclough D, Habermann T, Schnell L, Quella S, Cella D (2003) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 21(5):836–842CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Curbow B, Fogarty LA, McDonnell K, Chill J, Scott LB (2004) Can a brief video intervention improve breast cancer clinical trial knowledge and beliefs? Soc Sci Med 58(1):193–205CrossRefPubMed Curbow B, Fogarty LA, McDonnell K, Chill J, Scott LB (2004) Can a brief video intervention improve breast cancer clinical trial knowledge and beliefs? Soc Sci Med 58(1):193–205CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Daugherty CK, Fitchett G, Murphy PE, Peterman AH, Banik DM, Hlubocky F, Tartaro J (2005) Trusting God and medicine: spirituality in advanced cancer patients volunteering for clinical trials of experimental agents. Psycho-Oncology 14(2):135–146CrossRefPubMed Daugherty CK, Fitchett G, Murphy PE, Peterman AH, Banik DM, Hlubocky F, Tartaro J (2005) Trusting God and medicine: spirituality in advanced cancer patients volunteering for clinical trials of experimental agents. Psycho-Oncology 14(2):135–146CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Deatrick JA, Angst DB, Moore C (2002) Patients’ views of their children’s participation in phase I oncology clinical trials. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 19(4):114–121CrossRefPubMed Deatrick JA, Angst DB, Moore C (2002) Patients’ views of their children’s participation in phase I oncology clinical trials. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 19(4):114–121CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ehrenberger H (2001) Cancer clinical trial patients in the information age: a pilot study. Cancer Pract 9(4):191–197CrossRefPubMed Ehrenberger H (2001) Cancer clinical trial patients in the information age: a pilot study. Cancer Pract 9(4):191–197CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Eiser C, Davies H, Jenney M, Glaser A (2005) Mothers’ attitudes to the randomized controlled trial (RCT): the case of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. Child Care Health Dev 31(5):517–523CrossRefPubMed Eiser C, Davies H, Jenney M, Glaser A (2005) Mothers’ attitudes to the randomized controlled trial (RCT): the case of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. Child Care Health Dev 31(5):517–523CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ellis PM, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN (2002) Informing breast cancer patients about clinical trials: a randomized clinical trial of an educational booklet. Ann Oncol 13(9):1414–1423CrossRefPubMed Ellis PM, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN (2002) Informing breast cancer patients about clinical trials: a randomized clinical trial of an educational booklet. Ann Oncol 13(9):1414–1423CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ellis PM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH, Dunn SM, Houssami N (2001) Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate. J Clin Oncol 19(15):3554–3561PubMed Ellis PM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH, Dunn SM, Houssami N (2001) Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate. J Clin Oncol 19(15):3554–3561PubMed
27.
go back to reference Ford JG, Howerton MW, Bolen S, Gary TL, Lai GY, Tilburt J, Gibbons MC, Baffi C, Wilson RF, Feuerstein CJ, Tanpitukpongse P, Powe NR, Bass EB (2005) Knowledge and access to information on recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Evid Rep Technol Assess Summ 122:1–11PubMed Ford JG, Howerton MW, Bolen S, Gary TL, Lai GY, Tilburt J, Gibbons MC, Baffi C, Wilson RF, Feuerstein CJ, Tanpitukpongse P, Powe NR, Bass EB (2005) Knowledge and access to information on recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Evid Rep Technol Assess Summ 122:1–11PubMed
28.
go back to reference Gaston CM, Mitchell G (2005) Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 61(10):2252–2264CrossRefPubMed Gaston CM, Mitchell G (2005) Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 61(10):2252–2264CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Voigt KJ, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN (2002) When the treat goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions? J Clin Oncol 20(2):503–513CrossRefPubMed Gattellari M, Voigt KJ, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN (2002) When the treat goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions? J Clin Oncol 20(2):503–513CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Horng S, Grady C (2003) Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism. IRB 25(1):11–16CrossRefPubMed Horng S, Grady C (2003) Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism. IRB 25(1):11–16CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hutchison C, Campbell S (2002) Evaluation of an information booklet for patients considering participation in phase I clinical trials in cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 11(2):131–138CrossRef Hutchison C, Campbell S (2002) Evaluation of an information booklet for patients considering participation in phase I clinical trials in cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 11(2):131–138CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Jenkins V, Leach L, Fallowfield L, Nicholls K, Newsham A (2002) Describing randomization: patients’ and the public’s preferences compared with clinicians’ practice. Br J Cancer 87(8):854–858CrossRefPubMed Jenkins V, Leach L, Fallowfield L, Nicholls K, Newsham A (2002) Describing randomization: patients’ and the public’s preferences compared with clinicians’ practice. Br J Cancer 87(8):854–858CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC (2001) Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(2):139–147CrossRefPubMed Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC (2001) Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(2):139–147CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC (2001) Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 358(9295):1772–1177CrossRefPubMed Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC (2001) Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 358(9295):1772–1177CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Kelly C, Ghazi F, Caldwell K (2002) Psychological distress of cancer and clinical trial participation: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care 11(1):6–15CrossRef Kelly C, Ghazi F, Caldwell K (2002) Psychological distress of cancer and clinical trial participation: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care 11(1):6–15CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kornblith AB, Kemeny M, Peterson BL, Wheeler J, Crawford J, Bartlett N, Fleming G, Graziano S, Muss H, Cohen HJ (2002) Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Survey of oncologists’ perceptions of barriers to accrual of older patients with breast carcinoma to clinical trials. Cancer 95(5):989–996CrossRefPubMed Kornblith AB, Kemeny M, Peterson BL, Wheeler J, Crawford J, Bartlett N, Fleming G, Graziano S, Muss H, Cohen HJ (2002) Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Survey of oncologists’ perceptions of barriers to accrual of older patients with breast carcinoma to clinical trials. Cancer 95(5):989–996CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Kupst MJ, Patenaude AF, Walco GA, Sterling C (2003) Clinical trials in pediatric cancer: parental perspectives on informed consent. J Pediatr Hematol/Oncol 25(10):787–790CrossRef Kupst MJ, Patenaude AF, Walco GA, Sterling C (2003) Clinical trials in pediatric cancer: parental perspectives on informed consent. J Pediatr Hematol/Oncol 25(10):787–790CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lara PN, Paterniti DA, Chiechi C, Turrell C, Morain C, Horan N, Montell L, Gonzalez J, Davis S, Umutyan A, Martel CL, Gandara DR, Wun T, Beckett LA, Chen MS (2005) Evaluation of factors affecting awareness of and unwillingness to participate in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9282–9289CrossRefPubMed Lara PN, Paterniti DA, Chiechi C, Turrell C, Morain C, Horan N, Montell L, Gonzalez J, Davis S, Umutyan A, Martel CL, Gandara DR, Wun T, Beckett LA, Chen MS (2005) Evaluation of factors affecting awareness of and unwillingness to participate in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9282–9289CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Lin JS, Finlay A, Tu A, Gany FM (2005) Understanding immigrant Chinese Americans’ participation in cancer screening and clinical trials. J Community Health 30(6):451–466CrossRefPubMed Lin JS, Finlay A, Tu A, Gany FM (2005) Understanding immigrant Chinese Americans’ participation in cancer screening and clinical trials. J Community Health 30(6):451–466CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J (2006) Nursing research: methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. Mosby, St. Louis Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J (2006) Nursing research: methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. Mosby, St. Louis
41.
go back to reference Mandelblatt J, Kaufman E, Sheppard VB, Pomeroy J, Kavanaugh J, Canar J, Pallandre L, Cullen J, Huerta E (2005) Breast cancer prevention in community clinics: will low-income Latina patients participate in clinical trials? Prev Med 40(6):611–618CrossRefPubMed Mandelblatt J, Kaufman E, Sheppard VB, Pomeroy J, Kavanaugh J, Canar J, Pallandre L, Cullen J, Huerta E (2005) Breast cancer prevention in community clinics: will low-income Latina patients participate in clinical trials? Prev Med 40(6):611–618CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Mannel RS, Walker JL, Gould N, Scribner DR, Kamelle S, Tillmanns T, McMeekin DS, Gold MA (2003) Impact of individual physicians on enrollment of patients into clinical trials. Am J Clin Oncol 26(2):171–173CrossRefPubMed Mannel RS, Walker JL, Gould N, Scribner DR, Kamelle S, Tillmanns T, McMeekin DS, Gold MA (2003) Impact of individual physicians on enrollment of patients into clinical trials. Am J Clin Oncol 26(2):171–173CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Markman M (2006) Providing research participants with findings from completed cancer-related clinical trials: not quite as simple as it sounds. Cancer 106(7):1421–1424CrossRefPubMed Markman M (2006) Providing research participants with findings from completed cancer-related clinical trials: not quite as simple as it sounds. Cancer 106(7):1421–1424CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Markman M, Markman MR, Belland A, Petersen J (2006) Profile of ovarian cancer patients seeking information from a web-based decision support program. J Women’s Health 15(3):312–318CrossRef Markman M, Markman MR, Belland A, Petersen J (2006) Profile of ovarian cancer patients seeking information from a web-based decision support program. J Women’s Health 15(3):312–318CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Markman M, Petersen J, Montgomery R (2005) An examination of characteristics of lung and colon cancer patients participating in a web-based decision support program. Oncology 69(4):311–316CrossRefPubMed Markman M, Petersen J, Montgomery R (2005) An examination of characteristics of lung and colon cancer patients participating in a web-based decision support program. Oncology 69(4):311–316CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Martel CL, Li Y, Beckett L, Chew H, Christensen S, Davies A, Lam KS, Lau DH, Meyers FJ, O’Donnell RT, Richman C, Scudder S, Tanaka M, Tuscano J, Welborn J, Wun T, Gandara DR, Lara PN (2004) An evaluation of barriers to accrual in the era of legislation requiring insurance coverage of cancer clinical trial costs in California. Cancer J 10(5):294–300CrossRefPubMed Martel CL, Li Y, Beckett L, Chew H, Christensen S, Davies A, Lam KS, Lau DH, Meyers FJ, O’Donnell RT, Richman C, Scudder S, Tanaka M, Tuscano J, Welborn J, Wun T, Gandara DR, Lara PN (2004) An evaluation of barriers to accrual in the era of legislation requiring insurance coverage of cancer clinical trial costs in California. Cancer J 10(5):294–300CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Massimo LM, Wiley TJ, Casari EF (2004) From informed consent to shared consent: a developing process in pediatric oncology. Lancet Oncol 5(6):384–387CrossRefPubMed Massimo LM, Wiley TJ, Casari EF (2004) From informed consent to shared consent: a developing process in pediatric oncology. Lancet Oncol 5(6):384–387CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference McCray AT, Ide NC, Loane RR, Tse T (2004) Strategies for supporting consumer health information seeking. Medinfo 11(Pt 2):1152–1156 McCray AT, Ide NC, Loane RR, Tse T (2004) Strategies for supporting consumer health information seeking. Medinfo 11(Pt 2):1152–1156
49.
go back to reference McPherson CJ, Higginson IJ, Hearn J (2001) Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J Public Health Med 23(3):227–234CrossRefPubMed McPherson CJ, Higginson IJ, Hearn J (2001) Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J Public Health Med 23(3):227–234CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference McTiernan A (2003) Issues surrounding the participation of adolescents with cancer in clinical trials in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care 12(3):233–239CrossRef McTiernan A (2003) Issues surrounding the participation of adolescents with cancer in clinical trials in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care 12(3):233–239CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Melisko ME, Hassin F, Metzroth L, Moore DH, Brown B, Patel K, Rugo HS, Tripathy D (2005) Patient and physician attitudes toward breast cancer clinical trials: developing interventions based on understanding barriers. Clin Breast Cancer 6(1):45–54CrossRefPubMed Melisko ME, Hassin F, Metzroth L, Moore DH, Brown B, Patel K, Rugo HS, Tripathy D (2005) Patient and physician attitudes toward breast cancer clinical trials: developing interventions based on understanding barriers. Clin Breast Cancer 6(1):45–54CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Menikoff J (2005) Full disclosure: telling patients when not being a research subject is a good choice. Perspect Biol Med 48(1 Suppl):S139–S149PubMed Menikoff J (2005) Full disclosure: telling patients when not being a research subject is a good choice. Perspect Biol Med 48(1 Suppl):S139–S149PubMed
53.
go back to reference Meropol NJ, Weinfurt KP, Burnett CB, Balshem A, Benson AB, Castel L, Corbett S, Diefenbach M, Gaskin D, Li Y, Manne S, Marshall J, Rowland JH, Slater E, Sulmasy DP, Van Echo D, Washington S, Schulman KA (2003) Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician–patient communication. J Clin Oncol 21(13):2589–2596CrossRefPubMed Meropol NJ, Weinfurt KP, Burnett CB, Balshem A, Benson AB, Castel L, Corbett S, Diefenbach M, Gaskin D, Li Y, Manne S, Marshall J, Rowland JH, Slater E, Sulmasy DP, Van Echo D, Washington S, Schulman KA (2003) Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician–patient communication. J Clin Oncol 21(13):2589–2596CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Miller VA, Drotar D, Burant C, Kodish E (2005) Clinician–parent communication during informed consent for pediatric leukemia trials. J Pediatr Psychol 30(3):219–229CrossRefPubMed Miller VA, Drotar D, Burant C, Kodish E (2005) Clinician–parent communication during informed consent for pediatric leukemia trials. J Pediatr Psychol 30(3):219–229CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Mills N, Donovan JL, Smith M, Jacoby A, Neal DE, Hamdy FC (2003) Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study. Control Clin Trials 24(3):272–282CrossRefPubMed Mills N, Donovan JL, Smith M, Jacoby A, Neal DE, Hamdy FC (2003) Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study. Control Clin Trials 24(3):272–282CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Mills EJ, Seely D, Rachlis B, Griffith L, Wu P, Wilson K, Ellis P, Wright JR (2006) Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. Lancet Oncol 7(2):141–148CrossRefPubMed Mills EJ, Seely D, Rachlis B, Griffith L, Wu P, Wilson K, Ellis P, Wright JR (2006) Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. Lancet Oncol 7(2):141–148CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Moore S (2001) A need to try everything: patient participation in phase I trials. J Adv Nurs 33(6):738–747CrossRefPubMed Moore S (2001) A need to try everything: patient participation in phase I trials. J Adv Nurs 33(6):738–747CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Nguyen TT, Somkin CP, Ma Y (2005) Participation of Asian–American women in cancer chemoprevention research: physician perspectives. Cancer 104(12 Suppl):3006–3014CrossRefPubMed Nguyen TT, Somkin CP, Ma Y (2005) Participation of Asian–American women in cancer chemoprevention research: physician perspectives. Cancer 104(12 Suppl):3006–3014CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Northouse LL, Rosset T, Phillips L, Mood D, Schafenacker A, Kershaw T (2006) Research with families facing cancer: the challenges of accrual and retention. Res Nurs Health 29(3):199–211CrossRefPubMed Northouse LL, Rosset T, Phillips L, Mood D, Schafenacker A, Kershaw T (2006) Research with families facing cancer: the challenges of accrual and retention. Res Nurs Health 29(3):199–211CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Nurgat ZA, Craig W, Campbell NC, Bissett JD, Cassidy J, Nicolson MC (2005) Patient motivations surrounding participation in phase I and phase II clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 92(6):1001–1005CrossRefPubMed Nurgat ZA, Craig W, Campbell NC, Bissett JD, Cassidy J, Nicolson MC (2005) Patient motivations surrounding participation in phase I and phase II clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 92(6):1001–1005CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Olechnowicz JQ, Eder M, Simon C, Zyzanski S, Kodish E (2002) Assent observed: children’s involvement in leukemia treatment and research discussions. Pediatrics 109(5):806–814CrossRefPubMed Olechnowicz JQ, Eder M, Simon C, Zyzanski S, Kodish E (2002) Assent observed: children’s involvement in leukemia treatment and research discussions. Pediatrics 109(5):806–814CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Oppenheim D, Geoerger B, Hartmann O (2005) Ethical issues in pediatric oncology phase I–II trials based on a mother’s point of view. Bull Cancer 92(11):E57–E60PubMed Oppenheim D, Geoerger B, Hartmann O (2005) Ethical issues in pediatric oncology phase I–II trials based on a mother’s point of view. Bull Cancer 92(11):E57–E60PubMed
63.
go back to reference Paradiso A, Bruno M, Cicoria O, Digennaro M, Longo S, Rinaldi M, Schittulli F (2004) Analysis of the reasons for accepting or declining participation in genetic research for breast cancer: a hospital-based population study. Tumori 90(4):435–436PubMed Paradiso A, Bruno M, Cicoria O, Digennaro M, Longo S, Rinaldi M, Schittulli F (2004) Analysis of the reasons for accepting or declining participation in genetic research for breast cancer: a hospital-based population study. Tumori 90(4):435–436PubMed
64.
go back to reference Partridge AH, Wong JS, Knudsen K, Gelman R, Sampson E, Gadd M, Bishop KL, Harris JR, Winer EP (2005) Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study. Lancet 365(9463):963–964CrossRefPubMed Partridge AH, Wong JS, Knudsen K, Gelman R, Sampson E, Gadd M, Bishop KL, Harris JR, Winer EP (2005) Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study. Lancet 365(9463):963–964CrossRefPubMed
65.
go back to reference Paterniti DA, Chen MS, Chiechi C, Beckett LA, Horan N, Turrell C, Smith L, Morain C, Montell L, Luis Gonzalez J, Davis S, Lara PN (2005) Asian Americans and cancer clinical trials: a mixed-methods approach to understanding awareness and experience. Cancer 104(12 Suppl):S3015–S3024CrossRef Paterniti DA, Chen MS, Chiechi C, Beckett LA, Horan N, Turrell C, Smith L, Morain C, Montell L, Luis Gonzalez J, Davis S, Lara PN (2005) Asian Americans and cancer clinical trials: a mixed-methods approach to understanding awareness and experience. Cancer 104(12 Suppl):S3015–S3024CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Pentz RD, Billot L, Wendler D (2006) Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A 140(7):733–739PubMed Pentz RD, Billot L, Wendler D (2006) Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A 140(7):733–739PubMed
67.
go back to reference Pentz RD, Flamm AL, Sugarman J, Cohen MZ, Daniel Ayers G, Herbst RS, Abbruzzese JL (2002) Study of the media’s potential influence on prospective research participants’ understanding of and motivations for participation in a high-profile phase I trial. J Clin Oncol 20(18):3785–3791CrossRefPubMed Pentz RD, Flamm AL, Sugarman J, Cohen MZ, Daniel Ayers G, Herbst RS, Abbruzzese JL (2002) Study of the media’s potential influence on prospective research participants’ understanding of and motivations for participation in a high-profile phase I trial. J Clin Oncol 20(18):3785–3791CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference Richards MPM, Ponder M, Pharoah P, Everest S, Mackay J (2003) Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer. J Med Ethics 29(2):93–96CrossRefPubMed Richards MPM, Ponder M, Pharoah P, Everest S, Mackay J (2003) Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer. J Med Ethics 29(2):93–96CrossRefPubMed
69.
go back to reference Schaefer KM, Ladd E, Gergits MA, Gyauch L (2001) Backing and forthing: the process of decision making by women considering participation in a breast cancer prevention trial. Oncol Nurs Forum 28(4):703–709PubMed Schaefer KM, Ladd E, Gergits MA, Gyauch L (2001) Backing and forthing: the process of decision making by women considering participation in a breast cancer prevention trial. Oncol Nurs Forum 28(4):703–709PubMed
70.
go back to reference Scott JT, Prictor MJ, Harmsen M, Broom A, Entwistle V, Sowden A, Watt I (2003) Interventions for improving communication with children and adolescents about their cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:1–33 Scott JT, Prictor MJ, Harmsen M, Broom A, Entwistle V, Sowden A, Watt I (2003) Interventions for improving communication with children and adolescents about their cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:1–33
71.
go back to reference Simon CM, Kodish ED (2005) Step into my zapatos, doc: understanding and reducing communication disparities in the multicultural informed consent setting. Perspect Biol Med 48(1 Suppl):S123–S138PubMed Simon CM, Kodish ED (2005) Step into my zapatos, doc: understanding and reducing communication disparities in the multicultural informed consent setting. Perspect Biol Med 48(1 Suppl):S123–S138PubMed
72.
go back to reference Sorenson JB, Rossel P, Holm S (2004) Patient–physician communication concerning participation in cancer chemotherapy trials. Br J Cancer 90(2):328–332CrossRef Sorenson JB, Rossel P, Holm S (2004) Patient–physician communication concerning participation in cancer chemotherapy trials. Br J Cancer 90(2):328–332CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Stevens T, Ahmedzai SH (2004) Why do breast cancer patients decline entry into randomized trials and how do they feel about their decision later: a prospective, longitudinal, in-depth interview study. Patient Educ Couns 52(3):341–348CrossRefPubMed Stevens T, Ahmedzai SH (2004) Why do breast cancer patients decline entry into randomized trials and how do they feel about their decision later: a prospective, longitudinal, in-depth interview study. Patient Educ Couns 52(3):341–348CrossRefPubMed
74.
go back to reference Tattersall MHN, Gattellari M, Voigt K, Butow PN (2002) When the treatment goal is not cure: are patients informed adequately? Support Care Cancer 10(4):314–321CrossRefPubMed Tattersall MHN, Gattellari M, Voigt K, Butow PN (2002) When the treatment goal is not cure: are patients informed adequately? Support Care Cancer 10(4):314–321CrossRefPubMed
75.
go back to reference Thorne S, Hislop TG, Kuo M, Armstrong EA (2006) Hope and probability: patient perspectives of the meaning of numerical information in cancer communication. Qual Health Res 16(3):318–336CrossRefPubMed Thorne S, Hislop TG, Kuo M, Armstrong EA (2006) Hope and probability: patient perspectives of the meaning of numerical information in cancer communication. Qual Health Res 16(3):318–336CrossRefPubMed
76.
go back to reference Townsley CA, Selby R, Siu LL (2005) Systematic review of barriers to the recruitment of older patients with cancer onto clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 23(13):3112–3124CrossRefPubMed Townsley CA, Selby R, Siu LL (2005) Systematic review of barriers to the recruitment of older patients with cancer onto clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 23(13):3112–3124CrossRefPubMed
77.
go back to reference Tu S-P, Chen H, Chen A, Lim J, May S, Drescher C (2005) Clinical trials: understanding and perceptions of female Chinese–American cancer patients. Cancer 104(12 Suppl):S2999–S3005CrossRef Tu S-P, Chen H, Chen A, Lim J, May S, Drescher C (2005) Clinical trials: understanding and perceptions of female Chinese–American cancer patients. Cancer 104(12 Suppl):S2999–S3005CrossRef
78.
go back to reference Weinfurt KP, Castel LD, Li Y, Sulmasy DP, Balshem AM, Benson AB, Burnett CB, Gaskin DJ, Marshall JL, Slater EF, Schulman KA, Meropol NJ (2003) The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials. Cancer 98(1):166–175CrossRefPubMed Weinfurt KP, Castel LD, Li Y, Sulmasy DP, Balshem AM, Benson AB, Burnett CB, Gaskin DJ, Marshall JL, Slater EF, Schulman KA, Meropol NJ (2003) The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials. Cancer 98(1):166–175CrossRefPubMed
79.
go back to reference Weinfurt KP, Depuy V, Castel LD, Sulmasy DP, Schulman KA, Meropol NJ (2005) Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in phase I clinical trials. Cancer 103(1):140–147CrossRefPubMed Weinfurt KP, Depuy V, Castel LD, Sulmasy DP, Schulman KA, Meropol NJ (2005) Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in phase I clinical trials. Cancer 103(1):140–147CrossRefPubMed
80.
go back to reference Weinfurt KP, Sulmasy DP, Schulman KA, Meropol NJ (2003) Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutic misconception. Theor Med Bioeth 24(4):329–344CrossRefPubMed Weinfurt KP, Sulmasy DP, Schulman KA, Meropol NJ (2003) Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutic misconception. Theor Med Bioeth 24(4):329–344CrossRefPubMed
81.
go back to reference Wendler D, Kington R, Madans J, Van Wye G, Christ-Schmidt H, Pratt LA, Brawley OW, Gross CP, Emanuel E (2006) Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research? PLoS Med/Public Library of Science 3(2):e19CrossRef Wendler D, Kington R, Madans J, Van Wye G, Christ-Schmidt H, Pratt LA, Brawley OW, Gross CP, Emanuel E (2006) Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research? PLoS Med/Public Library of Science 3(2):e19CrossRef
82.
go back to reference Wright JR, Whelan TJ, Schiff S, Dubois S, Crooks D, Haines PT, DeRosa D, Roberts RS, Gafni A, Pritchard K, Levine MN (2004) Why cancer patients enter randomized clinical trials: exploring the factors that influence their decision. J Clin Oncol 22(21):4312–4318CrossRefPubMed Wright JR, Whelan TJ, Schiff S, Dubois S, Crooks D, Haines PT, DeRosa D, Roberts RS, Gafni A, Pritchard K, Levine MN (2004) Why cancer patients enter randomized clinical trials: exploring the factors that influence their decision. J Clin Oncol 22(21):4312–4318CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Recommendations for Enhancing Clinical Trials Education: a Review of the Literature
Authors
Karen A. Stepan
Amy P. Gonzalez
Vivian S. Dorsey
Debra K. Frye
Nita D. Pyle
Regina F. Smith
Terry A. Throckmorton
Louise A. Villejo
Scott B. Cantor
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0160-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Journal of Cancer Education 1/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine