Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Article

Recognition and attitudes of Japanese hematologists on sperm banking before chemotherapy: present status from nationwide questionnaire survey

Authors: Yasushi Yumura, Akira Tsujimura, Hiroshi Okada, Kuniaki Ota, Masahumi Kitazawa, Tatsuya Suzuki, Toshiyuki Kakinuma, Chie Watanabe, Seido Takae, Nao Suzuki, Teruaki Iwamoto

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Treatment advancements have improved young cancer patients’ survival rate considerably. Fertility preservation has become a very important tool in the prevention of treatment-induced gonadal toxicity. This study aimed to examine hematologists’ awareness of its necessity and importance.

Methods

Questionnaires were mailed to the directors of 230 institutes that treated hematological malignancies in adults. The directors were asked to provide information regarding their institutes, collaboration with sperm banks, the number of patients treated per year, selection criteria for patients providing information, and their awareness of and attitudes toward sperm preservation.

Results

The response rate was 40.0%. Municipal and private hospitals treated patients significantly less frequently relative to university hospitals (p = .002). Of the 92 participating hematology institutions, 17 included sperm banks and 69 collaborated with sperm banks in neighboring institutions. Many participants stated that sperm preservation should be performed before chemotherapy; however, only 38% provided sperm preservation information to all patients. Participants in facilities without sperm banks exhibited significantly lower levels of knowledge regarding sperm preservation, relative to those from institutions with sperm banks, and found discussing fertility preservation burdensome. This trend was identical to that observed in a survey conducted 10 years earlier.

Conclusion

Many hematologists did not appear to possess sufficient knowledge regarding fertility preservation. Moreover, few institutions included sperm banks, and a considerable burden was exerted on hematologists. The introduction of support systems is required to promote sperm preservation before cancer treatment.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Relander T, Cavallin-Stahl E, Garwicz S et al (2000) Gonadal and sexual function in men treated for childhood cancer. Med Pediatr Oncol 35:52–63CrossRefPubMed Relander T, Cavallin-Stahl E, Garwicz S et al (2000) Gonadal and sexual function in men treated for childhood cancer. Med Pediatr Oncol 35:52–63CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Clark ST, Radford JA, Crowther D et al (1995) Gonadal function following chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease: a comparative study of MVPP and seven-drug regimen. J Clin Oncol 13:134–139CrossRefPubMed Clark ST, Radford JA, Crowther D et al (1995) Gonadal function following chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease: a comparative study of MVPP and seven-drug regimen. J Clin Oncol 13:134–139CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lee SI, Schver LR, Partridge AH et al (2006) American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendation on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 24:2917–2931CrossRefPubMed Lee SI, Schver LR, Partridge AH et al (2006) American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendation on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 24:2917–2931CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN et al (2013) Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 31:2500–2510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN et al (2013) Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 31:2500–2510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference The Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology (2017) Clinical practice guideline for fertility preservation in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer patients (in Japanese): The Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology The Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology (2017) Clinical practice guideline for fertility preservation in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer patients (in Japanese): The Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology
8.
go back to reference Muller I, Oude Ophuis RJA, Broekmans FJM et al (2016) Semen cryopreservation and usage rate for assisted reproductive technology in 898 men with cancer. Reprod Biomed Online 32:147–153CrossRefPubMed Muller I, Oude Ophuis RJA, Broekmans FJM et al (2016) Semen cryopreservation and usage rate for assisted reproductive technology in 898 men with cancer. Reprod Biomed Online 32:147–153CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Johnson MD, Cooper AR, Jungheim ES et al (2013) Sperm banking for fertility preservation: a 20-year experience. Eur J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol 170:177–182CrossRef Johnson MD, Cooper AR, Jungheim ES et al (2013) Sperm banking for fertility preservation: a 20-year experience. Eur J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol 170:177–182CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Daudin M, Rives N, Walschaerts M et al (2015) Sperm cryopreservation in adolescence and young adults with cancer: results of the French national sperm banking network (CECOS). Fertil Steril 103:478–486CrossRefPubMed Daudin M, Rives N, Walschaerts M et al (2015) Sperm cryopreservation in adolescence and young adults with cancer: results of the French national sperm banking network (CECOS). Fertil Steril 103:478–486CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Depalo R, Falagario D, Masciandaro P et al (2016) Fertility preservation in males with cancer: 16-year monocentric experience of sperm banking and post-thaw reproductive outcomes. Ther Adv Med Oncol 8:412–420CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Depalo R, Falagario D, Masciandaro P et al (2016) Fertility preservation in males with cancer: 16-year monocentric experience of sperm banking and post-thaw reproductive outcomes. Ther Adv Med Oncol 8:412–420CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Tantiana CS, Bonetti FF, Pasqualotto PQ et al (2009) Sperm banking for male cancer patients: social and semen profiles. Int Braz J Urol 35:190–198CrossRef Tantiana CS, Bonetti FF, Pasqualotto PQ et al (2009) Sperm banking for male cancer patients: social and semen profiles. Int Braz J Urol 35:190–198CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Agarwal A, Ranganathan P, Kattal N et al (2004) Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens. Fertil Steril 81:342–348CrossRefPubMed Agarwal A, Ranganathan P, Kattal N et al (2004) Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens. Fertil Steril 81:342–348CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A et al (2002) Oncologist’s attitudes and practice regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol 20:1890–1897CrossRefPubMed Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A et al (2002) Oncologist’s attitudes and practice regarding banking sperm before cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol 20:1890–1897CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Watanabe C, Takahashi M, Kai I (2007) Hematologist practices and attitude toward chemotherapy-related infertility (in Japanese). Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. [Jpn J Cancer Chemother] 34:891–896 Watanabe C, Takahashi M, Kai I (2007) Hematologist practices and attitude toward chemotherapy-related infertility (in Japanese). Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. [Jpn J Cancer Chemother] 34:891–896
17.
go back to reference Kobayashi T, Shin T, Shimomura Y et al (2016) A questionnaire survey on attitude toward sperm cryopreservation among hematologists in Japan. Int J Hematol 105:349–352CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi T, Shin T, Shimomura Y et al (2016) A questionnaire survey on attitude toward sperm cryopreservation among hematologists in Japan. Int J Hematol 105:349–352CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Achille MA, Rosberger Z, Robitaille R et al (2006) Facilitators and obstacles to sperm banking in young men receiving gonadotoxic chemotherapy for cancer: the perspective of survivors and health care professionals. Hum Reprod 21:3206–3216CrossRefPubMed Achille MA, Rosberger Z, Robitaille R et al (2006) Facilitators and obstacles to sperm banking in young men receiving gonadotoxic chemotherapy for cancer: the perspective of survivors and health care professionals. Hum Reprod 21:3206–3216CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Recognition and attitudes of Japanese hematologists on sperm banking before chemotherapy: present status from nationwide questionnaire survey
Authors
Yasushi Yumura
Akira Tsujimura
Hiroshi Okada
Kuniaki Ota
Masahumi Kitazawa
Tatsuya Suzuki
Toshiyuki Kakinuma
Chie Watanabe
Seido Takae
Nao Suzuki
Teruaki Iwamoto
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1334-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine