Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Protocol

Receptive and expressive English language assessments used for young children: a scoping review protocol

Authors: Laureen J. McIntyre, Laurie-ann M. Hellsten, Julia Bidonde, Catherine Boden, Carolyn Doi

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The majority of a child’s language development occurs in the first 5 years of life when brain development is most rapid. There are significant long-term benefits to supporting all children’s language and literacy development such as maximizing their developmental potential (i.e., cognitive, linguistic, social-emotional), when children are experiencing a critical period of development (i.e., early childhood to 9 years of age). A variety of people play a significant role in supporting children’s language development, including parents, guardians, family members, educators, and/or speech-language pathologists. Speech-language pathologists and educators are the professionals who predominantly support children’s language development in order for them to become effective communicators and lay the foundation for later developing literacy skills (i.e., reading and writing skills). Therefore, these professionals need formal and informal assessments that provide them information on a child’s understanding and/or use of the increasingly complex aspects of language in order to identify and support the receptive and expressive language learning needs of diverse children during their early learning experiences (i.e., aged 1.5 to 9 years). However, evidence on what methods and tools are being used is lacking.

Methods

The authors will carry out a scoping review of the literature to identify studies and map the receptive and expressive English language assessment methods and tools that have been published and used since 1980. Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) six-stage approach to conducting a scoping review was drawn upon to design the protocol for this investigation: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results; and (6) consultation.

Discussion

This information will help these professionals identify and select appropriate assessment methods or tools that can be used to support development and/or identify areas of delay or difficulty and plan, implement, and monitor the progress of interventions supporting the development of receptive and expressive language skills in individuals with diverse language needs (e.g., typically developing children, children with language delays and disorders, children learning English as a second or additional language, Indigenous children who may be speaking dialects of English). Researchers plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the assessment methods or tools identified in the scoping review as an extension of this study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bloom L, Lahey M. Language development and language disorders. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1978. Bloom L, Lahey M. Language development and language disorders. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1978.
2.
go back to reference McIntyre LJ. Investigating teachers’ knowledge of oral language, Doctoral Dissertation. University of Alberta, Canada. 2005. McIntyre LJ. Investigating teachers’ knowledge of oral language, Doctoral Dissertation. University of Alberta, Canada. 2005.
3.
go back to reference Owens RE. Language development: an introduction. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan; 1992. Owens RE. Language development: an introduction. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan; 1992.
4.
go back to reference Smith TEC, Polloway EA, Patton JR, Dowdy CA, McIntyre LJ. Teaching students with special needs in inclusive settings. 5th Canadian ed. Toronto: Pearson Education; 2015. Smith TEC, Polloway EA, Patton JR, Dowdy CA, McIntyre LJ. Teaching students with special needs in inclusive settings. 5th Canadian ed. Toronto: Pearson Education; 2015.
5.
go back to reference Owens RE. Language development: an introduction. 8th ed. New York: Macmillan; 2012. Owens RE. Language development: an introduction. 8th ed. New York: Macmillan; 2012.
6.
go back to reference Lindfors JW. Children’s language and learning. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1987. Lindfors JW. Children’s language and learning. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1987.
9.
go back to reference Perfetti CA, Sandak R. Reading optimally builds on spoken language: implications for deaf readers. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2000;5:32–50.CrossRefPubMed Perfetti CA, Sandak R. Reading optimally builds on spoken language: implications for deaf readers. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2000;5:32–50.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Agin MC, Geng LF, Nicholl M. The late talker: what to do if your child isn’t talking yet. New York: Macmillan; 2004. Agin MC, Geng LF, Nicholl M. The late talker: what to do if your child isn’t talking yet. New York: Macmillan; 2004.
11.
go back to reference Dickinson DK, Tabors P. Fostering language and literacy in classroom homes. Young Children. 2002;57:10–9. Dickinson DK, Tabors P. Fostering language and literacy in classroom homes. Young Children. 2002;57:10–9.
12.
go back to reference Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B, International Child Development Steering Group. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369:60–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B, International Child Development Steering Group. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369:60–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hart B, Risley TR. The early catastrophe: the 30 million word gap by age 3. Am Educ. 2003;27:4–9. Hart B, Risley TR. The early catastrophe: the 30 million word gap by age 3. Am Educ. 2003;27:4–9.
14.
go back to reference Pierangelo R, Giuliani GA. Assessment in special education: a practical approach. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2009. Pierangelo R, Giuliani GA. Assessment in special education: a practical approach. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2009.
17.
go back to reference Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, Levac D, Ng C, Sharpe JP, Wilson K, Kenny M. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, Levac D, Ng C, Sharpe JP, Wilson K, Kenny M. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Hallahan DP, Kauffman JM, Pullen PC. Exceptional learners: an introduction to special education. 11th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2009. Hallahan DP, Kauffman JM, Pullen PC. Exceptional learners: an introduction to special education. 11th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2009.
22.
go back to reference McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. Methods and guidelines PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 Guideline Explanation and Elaboration (PRESS E&E). Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). 2016 January. https://www.cadth.ca/resources/finding-evidence/press. Accessed 27 July 2016 McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. Methods and guidelines PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 Guideline Explanation and Elaboration (PRESS E&E). Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). 2016 January. https://​www.​cadth.​ca/​resources/​finding-evidence/​press. Accessed 27 July 2016
24.
go back to reference Rader T, Mann M, Stansfield C, Cooper C, Sampson M. Methods for documenting systematic review searches: a discussion of common issues. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5:98–115.CrossRefPubMed Rader T, Mann M, Stansfield C, Cooper C, Sampson M. Methods for documenting systematic review searches: a discussion of common issues. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5:98–115.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Receptive and expressive English language assessments used for young children: a scoping review protocol
Authors
Laureen J. McIntyre
Laurie-ann M. Hellsten
Julia Bidonde
Catherine Boden
Carolyn Doi
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0471-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue