Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Neuroradiology 3/2016

01-09-2016 | Letter to the Editor

Recanalization and Reperfusion in Acute Stroke - More Often Different than Alike

Authors: A. Angermaier, S. Langner

Published in: Clinical Neuroradiology | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

In acute revascularization procedures in ischemic stroke, we currently make a distinction between recanalization and reperfusion. Recanalization literally means reopening of an occluded vessel. It is the direct goal of revascularization procedures and therefore a direct marker of technical success. Reperfusion means to restore blood flow in the formerly occluded vascular bed, especially in the nonvisible microcirculation. It is the prerequisite for stopping functionally inactive but viable brain tissue in the ischemic penumbra from becoming infarcted. Both processes have been regarded as a unit based on the assumption that recanalization will always lead to reperfusion. This led to a terminological confusion that is also reflected in current grading scales of endovascular treatment, which focus on reperfusion without recanalization or collateral circulation. The latter itself can alter flow in the distal vascular bed and therefore changes tissue outcome [1]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference McVerry F, Liebeskind DS, Muir KW. Systematic review of methods for assessing leptomeningeal collateral flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:576–82.CrossRefPubMed McVerry F, Liebeskind DS, Muir KW. Systematic review of methods for assessing leptomeningeal collateral flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:576–82.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference TIMI Study Group. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:932–6.CrossRef TIMI Study Group. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:932–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Higashida RT, Furlan AJ. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:e109–137.CrossRefPubMed Higashida RT, Furlan AJ. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:e109–137.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kallmes DF. TICI: If you are not confused, then you are not paying attention. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:975–6.CrossRefPubMed Kallmes DF. TICI: If you are not confused, then you are not paying attention. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:975–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tomsick T, Broderick J, Carrozella J, Khatri P, Hill M, Palesch Y, Khoury J; Interventional Management of Stroke II Investigators. Revascularization results in the interventional management of Stroke II trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:582–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tomsick T, Broderick J, Carrozella J, Khatri P, Hill M, Palesch Y, Khoury J; Interventional Management of Stroke II Investigators. Revascularization results in the interventional management of Stroke II trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:582–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Albers GW, Walker GA, Liebeskind DS, Smith WS. Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. The Lancet. 2012;380:1231–40.CrossRef Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Albers GW, Walker GA, Liebeskind DS, Smith WS. Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. The Lancet. 2012;380:1231–40.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference von Kummer R, Gerber J. IMS-3, synthesis, and MR rescue: no disaster, but down to earth. Clin Neuroradiol. 2013;23:1–3.CrossRef von Kummer R, Gerber J. IMS-3, synthesis, and MR rescue: no disaster, but down to earth. Clin Neuroradiol. 2013;23:1–3.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Khatri P, Neff J, Broderick JP, Khoury JC, Carrozzella J, Tomsick T. Revascularization end points in stroke interventional trials: recanalization versus reperfusion in IMS-I. Stroke. 2005;36:2400–3.CrossRefPubMed Khatri P, Neff J, Broderick JP, Khoury JC, Carrozzella J, Tomsick T. Revascularization end points in stroke interventional trials: recanalization versus reperfusion in IMS-I. Stroke. 2005;36:2400–3.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cho T, Nighoghossian N, Mikkelsen IK, Derex L, Hermier M, Pedraza S, Fiehler J, Østergaard L, Berthezène Y, Baron J. Reperfusion within 6 h outperforms recanalization in predicting penumbra salvage, lesion growth, final infarct, and clinical outcome. Stroke. 2015;46:1582–9.CrossRefPubMed Cho T, Nighoghossian N, Mikkelsen IK, Derex L, Hermier M, Pedraza S, Fiehler J, Østergaard L, Berthezène Y, Baron J. Reperfusion within 6 h outperforms recanalization in predicting penumbra salvage, lesion growth, final infarct, and clinical outcome. Stroke. 2015;46:1582–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Recanalization and Reperfusion in Acute Stroke - More Often Different than Alike
Authors
A. Angermaier
S. Langner
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Neuroradiology / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1869-1439
Electronic ISSN: 1869-1447
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0470-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Clinical Neuroradiology 3/2016 Go to the issue