Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Published in: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Ready for phase 5 - current status of ethnobiology in Southeast Asia

Authors: Syafitri Hidayati, F Merlin Franco, Rainer W Bussmann

Published in: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Southeast Asia is known for its rich linguistic, cultural and biological diversity. While ethnobiology in the west has benefitted greatly from intellectual and methodological advances over the last decades, the status of Southeast Asian ethnobiology is largely unknown. This study aims to provide an analysis of the current status of ethnobiology in Southeast Asia and outlines possibilities for future advancements.

Methods

We accessed papers cited in the Scopus and Web of Science databases for the period of 1960 to 2014 using the current as well as previous names of the 11 Southeast Asian countries and various disciplines of ethnobiology as key words. We juxtaposed the number of publications from each country against its number of indigenous groups and languages, to see if ethnobiology research has addressed this full spectrum of ethnical diversity. The available data for the last ten years was analysed according to the five phases concept to understand the nature of studies dominating Southeast Asian ethnobiology.

Results and conclusions

A total number of 312 publications were recorded in the databases for the period 1960–2014. Indonesia ranks highest (93 studies), followed by Thailand (68), Malaysia (58) Philippines (42), Vietnam (31), Laos (29), and other Southeast Asian countries (44). A strong correlation was found between the number of publications for each country, the number of indigenous groups, and the number of endangered languages. Comparing the data available for the period 2005–2009 with 2010–2014, we found a strong increase in the number of phase 5 publications. However, papers with bioprospecting focus were also on the rise, especially in Malaysia. Our study indicates that ethnobiologists still need to realise the full potential of the Biocultural Diversity of Southeast Asia, and that there is a strong need to focus more on socially relevant research.
Literature
1.
Powers S. Aboriginal botany. Proc Calif Acad Sci. 1874;5:373–9.
2.
3.
Cotton CM. Ethnobotany: principles and applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Chichester; 1996.
4.
5.
Conklin H. An ethnoecological approach to shifting agriculture. Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1954;17(2):133–42.CrossRef
6.
Ford RI: History of ethnobiology. In Ethnobiology. Edited by Anderson EN, Pearsall D, Hunn ES, Turner NJ. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011:15–26.
7.
8.
Žuškin E, Lipozenčić J, Cvetković P, Mustajbegović J, Schachter N, Mučić-Pučić B, et al. Ancient medicine – a review. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2008;16(3):149–57.PubMed
9.
Ravishankar B, Shukla VJ. Indian systems of medicine: a brief profile. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2007;4(3):319–37.PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
Van Rheede DHA. Hortus indicus malabaricus. Amsterdam: Joannis van Someren and Joannis van Dyck; 1678-703.
11.
Babulka P. Evaluation of medicinal plants used in Hungarian ethnomedicine, with special reference to the medicinally used food plants. In: Schroder E, Balansard G, Cabalion P, Fleurentin J, Mazars G, editors. Medicaments et aliments: approche ethnopharmacologique. Paris: Ostrom; 1996. p. 129–39.
12.
Clement D. The historical foundations of ethnobiology (1860–1899). J Ethnobiol. 1998;18(2):161–87.
13.
14.
Berlin B, Breedlove DE, Raven PH. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. Am Anthropol. 1973;75(1):214–42.CrossRef
15.
Hunn E. The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. Am Anthropol. 1982;84(4):830–47.CrossRef
16.
Escobar A. After nature: steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Curr Anthropol. 1999;40(1):1–30.CrossRef
17.
Hunn ES. Traditional environmental knowledge: alienable or inalienable intellectual property. In: Stepp JR Wyndham FS, Zarger RK, editors. Ethnobiology and Bioculturaldiversity. Athens: University of Georgia Press; 2002. p. 3–10.
18.
19.
Posey DA. The relation between cultural diversity and biodiversity. In: Bilderbeek S, editor. Biodiversity and International Law. Amsterdam: Ios Press; 1992. p. 44–7.
20.
Maffi L. Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2005;29:599–617.CrossRef
21.
Davidson-Hunt IJ, Turner KL, Mead ATP, Cabrera-Lopez J, Bolton R, Idrobo CJ, et al. Biocultural design: a new conceptual framework for sustainable development in rural indigenous and local communities. Sapiens. 2012;5:33–45.
22.
Folke C. Traditional knowledge in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 2004;9(3):7.
23.
Manne LL. Nothing has yet lasted forever: current and threatened levels of biological and cultural diversity. Evol Ecol Res. 2003;5:517–27.
24.
Sutherland WJ. Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species. Nature. 2003;423(6937):276–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Stepp JR, Cervone S, Castaneda H, Lasseter A, Stocks G, Gichon Y. Development of a GIS for global biocultural diversity. Policy Matters. 2004;13:267–70.
26.
27.
Zent S, Maffi L. Final report on indicator No. 2: methodology for developing a vitality index of traditional environmental knowledge (VITEK) for the project. Global indicators of the status and trends of linguistic diversity and traditional knowledge. Canada: Terralingua; 2009.
28.
Gavin MC, Botero CA, Bowern C, Colwell RK, Dunn M, Dunn RR, et al. Toward a mechanistic understanding of linguistic diversity. Bioscience. 2013;63(7):524–35.CrossRef
29.
Wyndham FS, Lepofsky D, Tiffany S. Taking stock in ethnobiology: where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going? J Ethnobiol. 2011;31(1):110–27.CrossRef
30.
Wolverton S. Ethnobiology 5: interdisciplinarity in an era of rapid environmental change. Ethnobiol Lett. 2013;4:21–5.CrossRef
31.
Maybury-Lewis D. Indigenous peoples, ethnic groups, and the state. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2002.
32.
Hall G, Patrinos H. Indigenous peoples, poverty and development. New York: Cambridge University; 2010.
33.
Albuquerque UP, Silva JS, Campos JLA, Sousa RS, Silva TC, Alves RRN. The current status of ethnobiological research in Latin America: gaps and perspectives. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013; 9 (72).
34.
Winzeler RL. The peoples of Southeast Asia today: ethnography, ethnology, and change in a complex region. Lanham: Alta Mira Press; 2010.
35.
Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22:338–42.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Jasco P. Google scholar: the pros and the cons. Online Inform Rev. 2005;29(2):208–14.CrossRef
37.
38.
Bisset NG. The Asian species of strychnos. Part I. Strychnos as a source of the drug lignum colubrinum (snake-wood). Lloydia. 1972;35(2):95–116.PubMed
39.
Ellen RF. Problems and progress in the ethnographic analysis of small scale human ecosystems. Man, New Series. 1978;13(2):290–303.
40.
41.
42.
Anderson EF. Ethnobotany of hill tribes of northern Thailand. II. Lahu medicinal plants. Econ Bot. 1986;40(4):442–50.CrossRef
43.
Stephenson PH. Vietnamese refugees in Victoria, B.C.: an overview of immigrant and refugee health care in a medium-sized Canadian urban centre. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(12):1631–42.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Bernstein JH. Higher-order categories in Brunei Dusun ethnobotany: the folk-classification of rainforest plants. In: Edwards DS, Booth WE, Choy SC, editors. Tropical rainforest research--current issues. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 435–50.CrossRef
45.
Rao AS, Bounphanousay V, Schiller JM, Alcantara AP, Jackson MT. Naming of traditional rice varieties by farmers in the Lao PDR. Genet Resour Crop Ev. 2002;49(1):83–8.CrossRef
46.
Fujisaka S, Moody K, Ingram K. A descriptive study of farming practices for dry seeded rainfed lowland rice in India, Indonesia, and Myanmar. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1993;45:115–28.CrossRef
47.
Collins S, Martins X, Mitchell A, Teshome A, Arnason JT. Quantitative ethnobotany of two East Timorese cultures. Econ Bot. 2006;60(4):347–61.CrossRef
48.
Eisenbruch M. Children with failure to thrive, epilepsy and STI/AIDS: indigenous taxonomies, attributions and ritual treatments. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998;3(4):505–18.CrossRef
49.
Loh CH. Use of traditional Chinese medicine in Singapore children: perceptions of parents and paediatricians. Singapore Med J. 2009;50(12):1162–8.PubMed
50.
51.
Ceuterick M, Vandebroek I, Torry B, Pieroni A. Cross-cultural adaptation in urban ethnobotany. The Colombian folk pharmacopoeia in London. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;120:342–59.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Mrozowski SA. Ethnobiology for a diverse world spaces and natures: archaeology and the political ecology of modern cities. J Ethnobiol. 2012;32(2):129–33.CrossRef
53.
Shirai Y, Rambo AT. Urban demand for wild foods in northeast Thailand: a survey of edible wild species sold in the Khon Kaen municipal market. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2014;12:113–29.
54.
55.
Currie TE, Mace R. The evolution of ethnolinguistic diversity. Adv Complex Syst. 2012;15:1150006.CrossRef
56.
57.
58.
McNally A, Magee D, Wolf AT. Hydropower and sustainability: resilience and vulnerability in China’s powersheds. J Environ Manag. 2009;90 Suppl 3:S286–93.CrossRef
59.
Hardison P, Bannister K. Ethics in ethnobiology: history, international law and policy, and contemporary issues. In: Anderson EN, Pearsall D, Hunn E, Turner N, editors. Ethnobiology. Canada: John and Sons; 2011. p. 27–49.CrossRef
60.
Mertz O, Padoch C, Fox J, Cramb RA, Leisz SJ, Lam NT, et al. Swidden change in Southeast Asia: understanding causes and consequences. Hum Ecol. 2009;37:259–64.CrossRef
61.
Khor GL. Food-based approaches to combat the double burden among the poor: challenges in the Asian context. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17 Suppl 1:111–5.PubMed
62.
Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Brook BW, Ng PKL. Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19(12):654–60.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Davis JT, Mengersen K, Abram NK, Ancrenaz M, Wells JA, Meijaard E. It’s not just conflict that motivates killing of orangutans. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e75373.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
64.
Vaz J, Agama AL. Seeking synergy between community and state-based governance for biodiversity conservation: the role of indigenous and community-conserved areas in Sabah. Malaysian Borneo Asia Pac Viewp. 2013;54(2):141–57.CrossRef
65.
Clarke G. From ethnocide to ethnodevelopment? Ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples in Southeast Asia. Third World Q. 2001;22(3):413–36.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ready for phase 5 - current status of ethnobiology in Southeast Asia
Authors
Syafitri Hidayati
F Merlin Franco
Rainer W Bussmann
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1746-4269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0005-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research

Of the importance of a leaf: the ethnobotany of sarma in Turkey and the Balkans

Research

Scented grasses in Norway—identity and uses

Research

Herbal remedy knowledge acquisition and transmission among the Yucatec Maya in Tabi, Mexico: a cross-sectional study

Research

Medicinal plants used to treat the most frequent diseases encountered in Ambalabe rural community, Eastern Madagascar

Research

Evidence of a link between taboos and sacrifices and resource scarcity of ritual plants

Research

Ethnobotanical survey of plants used in Afyonkarahisar-Turkey