Skip to main content
Top
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ariyaratne S, Iyengar KP, Nischal N, Chitti Babu N, Botchu R. A comparison of ChatGPT-generated articles with human-written articles. Skelet Radiol. 2023;14:1–4. Ariyaratne S, Iyengar KP, Nischal N, Chitti Babu N, Botchu R. A comparison of ChatGPT-generated articles with human-written articles. Skelet Radiol. 2023;14:1–4.
2.
go back to reference Huang J, Tan M. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. Am J Cancer Res. 2023;13(4):1148.PubMedPubMedCentral Huang J, Tan M. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. Am J Cancer Res. 2023;13(4):1148.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Hill-Yardin EL, Hutchinson MR, Laycock R, Spencer SJ. A Chat (GPT) about the future of scientific publishing. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;1(110):152–4.CrossRef Hill-Yardin EL, Hutchinson MR, Laycock R, Spencer SJ. A Chat (GPT) about the future of scientific publishing. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;1(110):152–4.CrossRef
4.
Metadata
Title
Re-evaluating the role of AI in scientific writing: a critical analysis on ChatGPT
Author
Partha Pratim Ray
Publication date
17-07-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04404-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2023

Skeletal Radiology 12/2023 Go to the issue