Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Rape | Research

“We don’t want problems”: reasons for denial of legal abortion based on conscientious objection in Mexico and Bolivia

Authors: Stephanie Andrea Küng, Jasmine Danette Wilkins, Fernanda Díaz de León, Freddy Huaraz, Erin Pearson

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The misuse of conscientious objection (CO) is a significant barrier to legal abortion access in many countries, especially in Latin America. We examine the reasons for denial of legal abortion services in Mexico and Bolivia and identify ways to mitigate the misuse of CO.

Methods

We conducted 34 in-depth interviews and 12 focus group discussions in two states in Mexico and four departments in Bolivia. Results were coded and categorized using a thematic analysis approach.

Results

Denial of abortion services based on CO is widespread in health facilities in Mexico and Bolivia and is primarily employed for reasons other than moral, religious, or ethical considerations. The main reasons for denial of services based on CO is lack of knowledge about abortion-related laws and fear of legal problems in abortion service provision. Conversely, the main reason to provide services is to comply with relevant laws. Denying services under the guise of CO negatively impacts pregnant people and health care teams, including fewer safe abortion options and increased workload and stigma, respectively. Most respondents cited training and education on abortion law as the foremost way to mitigate the negative impacts of the misuse of CO.

Conclusions

For many health personnel, knowing, understanding, and following the law is reason enough to provide abortion services. Individuals who object due to lack of knowledge about laws and fear of legal problems represent a key population that can be sensitized and equipped with the necessary information and resources to provide legal abortion services.
Footnotes
1
In Mexico City it is established that only physicians can perform abortions; in the rest of the country this is not established in the law but is an accepted practice.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chavkin W, Leitman L, Polin K. Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: a white paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2013;123:S41–56.CrossRef Chavkin W, Leitman L, Polin K. Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: a white paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2013;123:S41–56.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted Dec. 16, 1966, G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), U.N. GAOR, 21st Sess., Supp. No. 16, at 52, U.N. Doc.A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171 (entered into force March 23, 1976). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted Dec. 16, 1966, G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), U.N. GAOR, 21st Sess., Supp. No. 16, at 52, U.N. Doc.A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171 (entered into force March 23, 1976).
4.
go back to reference Harries J, et al. Conscientious objection and its impact on abortion service provision in South Africa: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2014;11(16):1–7. Harries J, et al. Conscientious objection and its impact on abortion service provision in South Africa: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2014;11(16):1–7.
5.
go back to reference Lopez-Gomez A, et al. Legal health services of abortion in Uruguay. Strategies of the primary health care public services. Salud Publica Mex. 2017;59(5):577–82.CrossRef Lopez-Gomez A, et al. Legal health services of abortion in Uruguay. Strategies of the primary health care public services. Salud Publica Mex. 2017;59(5):577–82.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fink LR, et al. “The Fetus Is My Patient, Too”: attitudes toward abortion and referral among physician conscientious objectors in Bogota, Colombia. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;42(2):71–80.CrossRef Fink LR, et al. “The Fetus Is My Patient, Too”: attitudes toward abortion and referral among physician conscientious objectors in Bogota, Colombia. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;42(2):71–80.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Diaz-Olavarrieta C, et al. El Programa de Interrupcion Legal del Embarazo en la Ciudad de Mexico: experiencias del personal de salud. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012;32(6):399–404.CrossRef Diaz-Olavarrieta C, et al. El Programa de Interrupcion Legal del Embarazo en la Ciudad de Mexico: experiencias del personal de salud. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012;32(6):399–404.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Harris LH, et al. Development of a conceptual model and survey instrument to measure conscientious objection to abortion provision. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164368.CrossRef Harris LH, et al. Development of a conceptual model and survey instrument to measure conscientious objection to abortion provision. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164368.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cabal L, Arango Olaya M, Montoya Robledo V. Striking a balance: conscientious objection and reproductive health care from the colombian perspective. Health Hum Rights. 2014;16(2):73. Cabal L, Arango Olaya M, Montoya Robledo V. Striking a balance: conscientious objection and reproductive health care from the colombian perspective. Health Hum Rights. 2014;16(2):73.
11.
go back to reference FIGO, Ethical Guidelines on Conscientious Objection 26–27. 2012. FIGO, Ethical Guidelines on Conscientious Objection 26–27. 2012.
17.
go back to reference Contreras X, et al. Experiences and opinions of health-care professionals regarding legal abortion in Mexico City: a qualitative study. Stud Fam Plann. 2011;42(3):183–90.CrossRef Contreras X, et al. Experiences and opinions of health-care professionals regarding legal abortion in Mexico City: a qualitative study. Stud Fam Plann. 2011;42(3):183–90.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Donnelly M, Murray C. Abortion care in Ireland: developing legal and ethical frameworks for conscientious provision. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;148(1):127–32.CrossRef Donnelly M, Murray C. Abortion care in Ireland: developing legal and ethical frameworks for conscientious provision. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;148(1):127–32.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chavkin W, Swerdlow L, Fifield J. Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion: an international comparative multiple-case study. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19(1):55–68.PubMedPubMedCentral Chavkin W, Swerdlow L, Fifield J. Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion: an international comparative multiple-case study. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19(1):55–68.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
“We don’t want problems”: reasons for denial of legal abortion based on conscientious objection in Mexico and Bolivia
Authors
Stephanie Andrea Küng
Jasmine Danette Wilkins
Fernanda Díaz de León
Freddy Huaraz
Erin Pearson
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Rape
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01101-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Reproductive Health 1/2021 Go to the issue