Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine

Authors: Hyesun Paik, Hee-Pyoung Park

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Maintaining cervical immobilization is essential during tracheal intubation in patients with unstable cervical spines. When using the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in patients with cervical immobilization, substantial neck extension is required for visualization of the glottis. However, the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope may require less neck extension due to its acute angulation. We hypothesized that C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscopic intubation would result in less cervical spine movement than Macintosh laryngoscopic intubation. We compared the effects of C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscopic intubation and Macintosh laryngoscopic intubation in terms of cervical spine motion during intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization.

Methods

In this randomized crossover study, the cervical spine angle was measured at the occiput–C1, C1–C2, and C2–C5 segments before and during tracheal intubation with either a C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope in 20 patients, with application of a neck collar for simulated cervical immobilization. Cervical spine motion was defined as the change in angle measured before and during tracheal intubation.

Results

The cervical spine motion at the occiput–C1 segment was measured at 12.1 ± 4.2° and 6.8 ± 5.0° during Macintosh laryngoscopic and C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscopic intubation, respectively, corresponding to a 44% reduction in cervical spine motion when using the latter device (mean difference, − 5.3; 98.33% CI: − 8.8 to − 1.8; p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two intubation devices at the C1–C2 segment (− 0.6; 98.33% CI: − 3.4 to 2.2; p = 0.639) or C2–C5 segment (0.2; 98.33% CI: − 6.0 to 6.4; p = 0.929).

Conclusions

The C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope causes less upper cervical spine motion than the Macintosh laryngoscope during tracheal intubation of patients with simulated cervical immobilization.

Trial registration

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.​gov on June 26, 2018 (NCT03567902).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Crosby E. Airway management after upper cervical spine injury: what have we learned? Can J Anaesth. 2002;49(7):733–44.CrossRef Crosby E. Airway management after upper cervical spine injury: what have we learned? Can J Anaesth. 2002;49(7):733–44.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kunzel KH, Gaber O, Boehler M, Puhringer F. Cervical spine motion during airway management: a cinefluoroscopic study of the posteriorly destabilized third cervical vertebrae in human cadavers. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(5):1274–8.CrossRef Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kunzel KH, Gaber O, Boehler M, Puhringer F. Cervical spine motion during airway management: a cinefluoroscopic study of the posteriorly destabilized third cervical vertebrae in human cadavers. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(5):1274–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Hara K. Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(4):563–7.CrossRef Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Hara K. Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(4):563–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(3):910–5.CrossRef Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(3):910–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference El-Tahan MR, El Kenany S, Khidr AM, Al Ghamdi AA, Tawfik AM, Al Mulhim AS. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with king vision video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy: a crossover randomized study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83(11):1152–60.PubMed El-Tahan MR, El Kenany S, Khidr AM, Al Ghamdi AA, Tawfik AM, Al Mulhim AS. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with king vision video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy: a crossover randomized study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83(11):1152–60.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Laosuwan P, Earsakul A, Numkarunarunrote N, Khamjaisai J, Charuluxananan S. Randomized cinefluoroscopic comparison of cervical spine motion using McGrath series 5 and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with manual in-line stabilization. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(Suppl 1):S63–9.PubMed Laosuwan P, Earsakul A, Numkarunarunrote N, Khamjaisai J, Charuluxananan S. Randomized cinefluoroscopic comparison of cervical spine motion using McGrath series 5 and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with manual in-line stabilization. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(Suppl 1):S63–9.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Inan G, Bedirli N, Ozkose Satirlar Z. Radiographic comparison of cervical spine motion using LMA Fastrach, LMA CTrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Turk J Med Sci. 2019;49(6):1681–6.PubMed Inan G, Bedirli N, Ozkose Satirlar Z. Radiographic comparison of cervical spine motion using LMA Fastrach, LMA CTrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Turk J Med Sci. 2019;49(6):1681–6.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Swain A, Bhagat H, Gupta V, Salunke P, Panda NB, Sahu S. Intubating laryngeal mask airway-assisted flexible Bronchoscopic intubation is associated with reduced cervical spine motion when compared with C-MAC video laryngoscopy-guided intubation: a prospective randomized cross over trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000583. Swain A, Bhagat H, Gupta V, Salunke P, Panda NB, Sahu S. Intubating laryngeal mask airway-assisted flexible Bronchoscopic intubation is associated with reduced cervical spine motion when compared with C-MAC video laryngoscopy-guided intubation: a prospective randomized cross over trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​ANA.​0000000000000583​.
9.
go back to reference Suppan L, Tramer MR, Niquille M, Grosgurin O, Marti C. Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(1):27–36.CrossRef Suppan L, Tramer MR, Niquille M, Grosgurin O, Marti C. Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(1):27–36.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Foulds LT, McGuire BE, Shippey BJ. A randomised cross-over trial comparing the McGrath((R)) series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilisation. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(4):437–42.CrossRef Foulds LT, McGuire BE, Shippey BJ. A randomised cross-over trial comparing the McGrath((R)) series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilisation. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(4):437–42.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jung JY. Airway management of patients with traumatic brain injury/C-spine injury. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68(3):213–9.CrossRef Jung JY. Airway management of patients with traumatic brain injury/C-spine injury. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68(3):213–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cavus E, Neumann T, Doerges V, Moeller T, Scharf E, Wagner K, et al. First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(2):382–5.CrossRef Cavus E, Neumann T, Doerges V, Moeller T, Scharf E, Wagner K, et al. First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(2):382–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Drenguis AS, Carlson JN. GlideScope vs. C-MAC for awake upright laryngoscopy. J Emerg Med. 2015;49(3):361–8.CrossRef Drenguis AS, Carlson JN. GlideScope vs. C-MAC for awake upright laryngoscopy. J Emerg Med. 2015;49(3):361–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ghandour MA, Elgamal NA, Ammar RA, Elnekiedy AM. Cervical spine motion during intubation: a fluoroscopic comparison between three intubation techniques. Res Opinion Anesthesia Intensive Care. 2018;5:73–9.CrossRef Ghandour MA, Elgamal NA, Ammar RA, Elnekiedy AM. Cervical spine motion during intubation: a fluoroscopic comparison between three intubation techniques. Res Opinion Anesthesia Intensive Care. 2018;5:73–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Robitaille A, Williams SR, Tremblay MH, Guilbert F, Theriault M, Drolet P. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization: direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope videolaryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(3):935–41.CrossRef Robitaille A, Williams SR, Tremblay MH, Guilbert F, Theriault M, Drolet P. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization: direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope videolaryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(3):935–41.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kim TK, Son JD, Seo H, Lee YS, Bae J, Park HP. A randomized crossover study comparing cervical spine motion during intubation between two Lightwand intubation techniques in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: laryngoscope-assisted versus conventional Lightwand intubation. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(2):485–90.CrossRef Kim TK, Son JD, Seo H, Lee YS, Bae J, Park HP. A randomized crossover study comparing cervical spine motion during intubation between two Lightwand intubation techniques in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: laryngoscope-assisted versus conventional Lightwand intubation. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(2):485–90.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Prasarn ML, Conrad B, Rubery PT, Wendling A, Aydog T, Horodyski M, et al. Comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in a cadaver model with global ligamentous instability at C5-C6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(6):476–81.CrossRef Prasarn ML, Conrad B, Rubery PT, Wendling A, Aydog T, Horodyski M, et al. Comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in a cadaver model with global ligamentous instability at C5-C6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(6):476–81.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wendling AL, Tighe PJ, Conrad BP, Baslanti TO, Horodyski M, Rechtine GR. A comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in cadaver models of global ligamentous instability at c1-2. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(1):126–32.CrossRef Wendling AL, Tighe PJ, Conrad BP, Baslanti TO, Horodyski M, Rechtine GR. A comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in cadaver models of global ligamentous instability at c1-2. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(1):126–32.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nam K, Lee Y, Park HP, Chung J, Yoon HK, Kim TK. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation using an Optiscope versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: a prospective randomized crossover study. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(6):1666–72.CrossRef Nam K, Lee Y, Park HP, Chung J, Yoon HK, Kim TK. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation using an Optiscope versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: a prospective randomized crossover study. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(6):1666–72.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hindman BJ, From RP, Fontes RB, Traynelis VC, Todd MM, Zimmerman MB, et al. Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation in cadavers-cadavers versus patients, the effect of repeated intubations, and the effect of type II odontoid fracture on C1-C2 motion. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(5):1042–58.CrossRef Hindman BJ, From RP, Fontes RB, Traynelis VC, Todd MM, Zimmerman MB, et al. Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation in cadavers-cadavers versus patients, the effect of repeated intubations, and the effect of type II odontoid fracture on C1-C2 motion. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(5):1042–58.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gawlowski P, Smereka J, Madziala M, Cohen B, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L. Comparison of the ETView single lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(16):e5873.CrossRef Gawlowski P, Smereka J, Madziala M, Cohen B, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L. Comparison of the ETView single lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(16):e5873.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gawlowski P, Smereka J, Madziala M, Szarpak L, Frass M, Robak O. Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via the iGEL for intubation with C-spine immobilization: a randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(3):484–7.CrossRef Gawlowski P, Smereka J, Madziala M, Szarpak L, Frass M, Robak O. Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via the iGEL for intubation with C-spine immobilization: a randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(3):484–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Smereka J, Ladny JR, Naylor A, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(8):1142–6.CrossRef Smereka J, Ladny JR, Naylor A, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(8):1142–6.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Karczewska K, Szarpak L, Smereka J, Dabrowski M, Ladny JR, Wieczorek W, et al. ET-view compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(4):274–82.PubMed Karczewska K, Szarpak L, Smereka J, Dabrowski M, Ladny JR, Wieczorek W, et al. ET-view compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(4):274–82.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kaminska H, Wieczorek W, Dabrowski M, Smereka J, Szarpak L, Ladny JR. Comparison of four laryngoscopes in cervical immobilization scenario. Pilot data. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(5):890–1.CrossRef Kaminska H, Wieczorek W, Dabrowski M, Smereka J, Szarpak L, Ladny JR. Comparison of four laryngoscopes in cervical immobilization scenario. Pilot data. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(5):890–1.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tescher AN, Rindflesch AB, Youdas JW, Jacobson TM, Downer LL, Miers AG, et al. Range-of-motion restriction and craniofacial tissue-interface pressure from four cervical collars. J Trauma. 2007;63(5):1120–6.CrossRef Tescher AN, Rindflesch AB, Youdas JW, Jacobson TM, Downer LL, Miers AG, et al. Range-of-motion restriction and craniofacial tissue-interface pressure from four cervical collars. J Trauma. 2007;63(5):1120–6.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ladny M, Smereka J, Ahuja S, Szarpak L, Ruetzler K, Ladny JR. Effect of 5 different cervical collars on optic nerve sheath diameter: a randomized crossover trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(16):e19740.CrossRef Ladny M, Smereka J, Ahuja S, Szarpak L, Ruetzler K, Ladny JR. Effect of 5 different cervical collars on optic nerve sheath diameter: a randomized crossover trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(16):e19740.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine
Authors
Hyesun Paik
Hee-Pyoung Park
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01118-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020 Go to the issue