Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Gastrointestinal

Radiomics nomogram for predicting the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumours preoperatively

Authors: Tao Chen, Zhenyuan Ning, Lili Xu, Xingyu Feng, Shuai Han, Holger R. Roth, Wei Xiong, Xixi Zhao, Yanfeng Hu, Hao Liu, Jiang Yu, Yu Zhang, Yong Li, Yikai Xu, Kensaku Mori, Guoxin Li

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To develop and evaluate a radiomics nomogram for differentiating the malignant risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).

Methods

A total of 222 patients (primary cohort: n = 130, our centre; external validation cohort: n = 92, two other centres) with pathologically diagnosed GISTs were enrolled. A Relief algorithm was used to select the feature subset with the best distinguishing characteristics and to establish a radiomics model with a support vector machine (SVM) classifier for malignant risk differentiation. Determinant clinical characteristics and subjective CT features were assessed to separately construct a corresponding model. The models showing statistical significance in a multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to develop a nomogram. The diagnostic performance of these models was evaluated using ROC curves. Further calibration of the nomogram was evaluated by calibration curves.

Results

The generated radiomics model had an AUC value of 0.867 (95% CI 0.803–0.932) in the primary cohort and 0.847 (95% CI 0.765–0.930) in the external cohort. In the entire cohort, the AUCs for the radiomics model, subjective CT findings model, clinical index model and radiomics nomogram were 0.858 (95% CI 0.807–0.908), 0.774 (95% CI 0.713–0.835), 0.759 (95% CI 0.697–0.821) and 0.867 (95% CI 0.818–0.915), respectively. The nomogram showed good calibration.

Conclusions

This radiomics nomogram predicted the malignant potential of GISTs with excellent accuracy and may be used as an effective tool to guide preoperative clinical decision-making.

Key Points

• CT-based radiomics model can differentiate low- and high-malignant-potential GISTs with satisfactory accuracy compared with subjective CT findings and clinical indexes.
• Radiomics nomogram integrated with the radiomics signature, subjective CT findings and clinical indexes can achieve individualised risk prediction with improved diagnostic performance.
• This study might provide significant and valuable background information for further studies such as response evaluation of neoadjuvant imatinib and recurrence risk prediction.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nishida T, Blay JY, Hirota S, Kitagawa Y, Kang YK (2016) The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines. Gastric Cancer 19:3–14CrossRefPubMed Nishida T, Blay JY, Hirota S, Kitagawa Y, Kang YK (2016) The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines. Gastric Cancer 19:3–14CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
4.
go back to reference Nishida T, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S, Nishida Y (2013) Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Dig Endosc 25:479–489CrossRefPubMed Nishida T, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S, Nishida Y (2013) Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Dig Endosc 25:479–489CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Joensuu H (2008) Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol 39:1411–1419CrossRefPubMed Joensuu H (2008) Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol 39:1411–1419CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Miettinen M, Lasota J (2006) Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol 23:70–83CrossRefPubMed Miettinen M, Lasota J (2006) Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol 23:70–83CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zhou C, Duan X, Zhang X, Hu H, Wang D, Shen J (2016) Predictive features of CT for risk stratifications in patients with primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Eur Radiol 26:3086–3093CrossRefPubMed Zhou C, Duan X, Zhang X, Hu H, Wang D, Shen J (2016) Predictive features of CT for risk stratifications in patients with primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Eur Radiol 26:3086–3093CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Burkill GJ, Badran M, Al-Muderis O et al (2003) Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor: distribution, imaging features, and pattern of metastatic spread. Radiology 226:527–532CrossRefPubMed Burkill GJ, Badran M, Al-Muderis O et al (2003) Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor: distribution, imaging features, and pattern of metastatic spread. Radiology 226:527–532CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577CrossRefPubMed Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wu S, Zheng J, Li Y et al (2017) A radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23:6904–6911CrossRefPubMed Wu S, Zheng J, Li Y et al (2017) A radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23:6904–6911CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Huang YQ, Liang CH, He L et al (2016) Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:2157–2164CrossRefPubMed Huang YQ, Liang CH, He L et al (2016) Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:2157–2164CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kononenko I (1994) Estimating attributes: analysis and extensions of RELIEF. In: Bergadano F, De Raedt L (eds) Machine Learning: ECML-94. ECML 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence), vol 784. Springer, Berlin, pp 171–182 Kononenko I (1994) Estimating attributes: analysis and extensions of RELIEF. In: Bergadano F, De Raedt L (eds) Machine Learning: ECML-94. ECML 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence), vol 784. Springer, Berlin, pp 171–182
16.
go back to reference Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Grazioli L, Blachar A, Peterson MS, Thaete L (2001) Focal nodular hyperplasia: CT findings with emphasis on multiphasic helical CT in 78 patients. Radiology 219:61–68CrossRefPubMed Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Grazioli L, Blachar A, Peterson MS, Thaete L (2001) Focal nodular hyperplasia: CT findings with emphasis on multiphasic helical CT in 78 patients. Radiology 219:61–68CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, Panageas KS (2008) How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol 26:1364–1370CrossRefPubMed Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, Panageas KS (2008) How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol 26:1364–1370CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Han DS, Suh YS, Kong SH et al (2012) Nomogram predicting long-term survival after d2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:3834–3840 Han DS, Suh YS, Kong SH et al (2012) Nomogram predicting long-term survival after d2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:3834–3840
19.
go back to reference von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS et al (2016) Soft tissue sarcoma, Version 2.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14:758–786CrossRef von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS et al (2016) Soft tissue sarcoma, Version 2.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14:758–786CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nishida T, Goto O, Raut CP, Yahagi N (2016) Diagnostic and treatment strategy for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer 122:3110–3118CrossRefPubMed Nishida T, Goto O, Raut CP, Yahagi N (2016) Diagnostic and treatment strategy for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer 122:3110–3118CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tanaka J, Oshima T, Hori K et al (2010) Small gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach showing rapid growth and early metastasis to the liver. Dig Endosc 22:354–356CrossRefPubMed Tanaka J, Oshima T, Hori K et al (2010) Small gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach showing rapid growth and early metastasis to the liver. Dig Endosc 22:354–356CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ng F, Kozarski R, Ganeshan B, Goh V (2013) Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? Eur J Radiol 82:342–348CrossRefPubMed Ng F, Kozarski R, Ganeshan B, Goh V (2013) Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? Eur J Radiol 82:342–348CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kickingereder P, Gotz M, Muschelli J et al (2016) Large-scale radiomic profiling of recurrent glioblastoma identifies an imaging predictor for stratifying anti-angiogenic treatment response. Clin Cancer Res 22:5765–5771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kickingereder P, Gotz M, Muschelli J et al (2016) Large-scale radiomic profiling of recurrent glioblastoma identifies an imaging predictor for stratifying anti-angiogenic treatment response. Clin Cancer Res 22:5765–5771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Chapiro J, Duran R, Lin M et al (2015) Identifying staging markers for hepatocellular carcinoma before transarterial chemoembolization: comparison of three-dimensional quantitative versus non-three-dimensional imaging markers. Radiology 275:438–447CrossRefPubMed Chapiro J, Duran R, Lin M et al (2015) Identifying staging markers for hepatocellular carcinoma before transarterial chemoembolization: comparison of three-dimensional quantitative versus non-three-dimensional imaging markers. Radiology 275:438–447CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Benjamin RS, Choi H, Macapinlac HA et al (2007) We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST. J Clin Oncol 25:1760–1764CrossRefPubMed Benjamin RS, Choi H, Macapinlac HA et al (2007) We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST. J Clin Oncol 25:1760–1764CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Dudeck O, Zeile M, Reichardt P, Pink D (2011) Comparison of RECIST and Choi criteria for computed tomographic response evaluation in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with sunitinib. Ann Oncol 22:1828–1833CrossRefPubMed Dudeck O, Zeile M, Reichardt P, Pink D (2011) Comparison of RECIST and Choi criteria for computed tomographic response evaluation in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with sunitinib. Ann Oncol 22:1828–1833CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Wardelmann E, Sihto H et al (2017) Effect of KIT and PDGFRA mutations on survival in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with adjuvant imatinib an exploratory analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 3:602–609CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Joensuu H, Wardelmann E, Sihto H et al (2017) Effect of KIT and PDGFRA mutations on survival in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with adjuvant imatinib an exploratory analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 3:602–609CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Radiomics nomogram for predicting the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumours preoperatively
Authors
Tao Chen
Zhenyuan Ning
Lili Xu
Xingyu Feng
Shuai Han
Holger R. Roth
Wei Xiong
Xixi Zhao
Yanfeng Hu
Hao Liu
Jiang Yu
Yu Zhang
Yong Li
Yikai Xu
Kensaku Mori
Guoxin Li
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5629-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

European Radiology 3/2019 Go to the issue