Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 12/2013

01-12-2013 | Scientific Article

Radiographic evaluation of INBONE total ankle arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 30 cases

Authors: Abhijit Datir, Minzhi Xing, Aparna Kakarala, Michael R. Terk, Sameh A. Labib

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives of this work were to retrospectively describe the radiographic assessment of INBONE total ankle arthroplasty in 30 patients using validated linear and angular measurements and to correlate these findings with the final surgical outcome over a 2-year follow-up period.

Materials and methods

Thirty consecutive patients (21 females, nine males; mean age, 64.8 years) underwent INBONE total ankle arthroplasty during 2007–2011. After IRB approval, a retrospective pre- and post-operative radiographic analysis was performed using validated linear and angular measurements. The pre- and post-operative assessment included the tibial angle, talar angle, tibial slope, and coronal deformity. Post-operative measurements also included the talocalcaneal angle, joint space height, talar height, lateral tibial component angle, lateral talar component angle, and anteroposterior tibial component angle. The post-operative bone loss, subluxation, positioning, and subsidence were also assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using two-sample t test and Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Out of 30 patients, 23 had a successful clinical outcome with intact prosthesis at a 2-year follow-up. The only variables with significant correlation (p < 0.05) to the post-surgical outcome were the lateral talar component angle (p = 0.002) and the mean difference between pre- and post-operative tibial slope (p = 0.001). The coronal deformity had significant mean difference between pre- and post-operative values (p < 0.001); however, it lacked a significant correlation to the final surgical outcome. None of the categorical variables had a significant correlation with post-surgical outcome.

Conclusions

In our retrospective study, only the lateral talar component angle and the mean difference between the pre- and post-operative tibial slope had significant correlation with post-surgical outcome in INBONE ankle arthroplasty. These measurements may be helpful in radiographic assessment of the INBONE ankle arthroplasty.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown TD, Johnston RC, Saltzman CL, Marsh JL, Buckwalter JA. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: a first estimate of incidence, prevalence, and burden of disease. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:739–44.PubMedCrossRef Brown TD, Johnston RC, Saltzman CL, Marsh JL, Buckwalter JA. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: a first estimate of incidence, prevalence, and burden of disease. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:739–44.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Thomas RH, Daniels TR. Ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:923–36.PubMed Thomas RH, Daniels TR. Ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:923–36.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Piriou P, Culpan P, Mullins M, Cardon JN, Pozzi D, Judet T. Ankle replacement versus arthrodesis: a comparative gait analysis study. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:3–9.PubMedCrossRef Piriou P, Culpan P, Mullins M, Cardon JN, Pozzi D, Judet T. Ankle replacement versus arthrodesis: a comparative gait analysis study. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:3–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thomas R, Daniels TR, Parker K. Gait analysis and functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:526–35.PubMedCrossRef Thomas R, Daniels TR, Parker K. Gait analysis and functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:526–35.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, Iorio LJ. New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle Int. 1988;8:279–90.CrossRef Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, Iorio LJ. New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle Int. 1988;8:279–90.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1899–905.PubMedCrossRef Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1899–905.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, Zimmerman MB, Alliman KJ, Alvine FG, et al. The agility total ankle arthroplasty: seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1161–71.PubMed Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, Zimmerman MB, Alliman KJ, Alvine FG, et al. The agility total ankle arthroplasty: seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1161–71.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:579–96.PubMedCrossRef Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:579–96.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2143–9.PubMedCrossRef SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2143–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference SooHoo NF, Kominski G. Cost-effectiveness analysis of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2446–55.PubMed SooHoo NF, Kominski G. Cost-effectiveness analysis of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2446–55.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier JA, Buscayret F, Graveleau N, Piriou P. Midterm results of the Salto total ankle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:6–18.PubMedCrossRef Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier JA, Buscayret F, Graveleau N, Piriou P. Midterm results of the Salto total ankle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:6–18.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cracchiolo A, Deorio JK. Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:530–40.PubMed Cracchiolo A, Deorio JK. Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:530–40.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ellis S, DeOrio JK. The INBONE total ankle replacement. Oper Tech Orthop 2010; 20:201–210. Ellis S, DeOrio JK. The INBONE total ankle replacement. Oper Tech Orthop 2010; 20:201–210.
14.
go back to reference Kitaoaka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349–53.CrossRef Kitaoaka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349–53.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, Alvine FG. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1410–20.PubMed Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, Alvine FG. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1410–20.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Kopp FJ, Patel MM, Deland JT, O’Malley MJ. Total ankle arthroplasty with the agility prosthesis: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:97–103.PubMed Kopp FJ, Patel MM, Deland JT, O’Malley MJ. Total ankle arthroplasty with the agility prosthesis: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:97–103.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Greisberg J, Hansen ST, DiGiovanni C. Alignment and technique in total ankle arthroplasty. Oper Tech Ortho. 2004;14:21–30.CrossRef Greisberg J, Hansen ST, DiGiovanni C. Alignment and technique in total ankle arthroplasty. Oper Tech Ortho. 2004;14:21–30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Radiographic evaluation of INBONE total ankle arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 30 cases
Authors
Abhijit Datir
Minzhi Xing
Aparna Kakarala
Michael R. Terk
Sameh A. Labib
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1718-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

Skeletal Radiology 12/2013 Go to the issue

Test Yourself: Question

Routine follow-up