Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 8/2004

01-08-2004 | Article

Radiographic differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma in the fibula

Authors: Scott D. Kendell, Mark S. Collins, Mark C. Adkins, Murali Sundaram, Krishnan K. Unni

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 8/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate demographic and radiographic features that may differentiate between enchondroma and low-grade chondrosarcoma of the fibula. The radiographs of ninety-three histologically-confirmed cartilaginous tumors of the fibula were retrospectively reviewed along with demographic information as to patient age and gender. Fifty-four enchondromas and thirty-nine low-grade chondrosarcomas were included in the study. Multiple previously-established radiographic features distinguishing enchondroma from chondrosarcoma were evaluated in each fibular tumor in a consensus manner by two experienced, board-certified and fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Five radiographic features were shown to statistically favor chondrosarcoma over enchondroma in the fibula. These were soft-tissue mass (p<0.0001), periosteal reaction (p=0.008), cortical disruption in the juxta-articular fibula (p=0.0133), cortical thickening (p=0.032), and tumor size greater than 4 cm (p=0.0046). No statistically-significant demographic differences were found between patients with enchondroma and chondrosarcoma of the fibula. When two or more of the identified features of malignancy are identified in the same patient, chondrosarcoma is 2.4 times more likely than in those patients exhibiting none of the features of malignancy. Soft-tissue mass, periosteal reaction, cortical disruption in the juxta-articular fibula, cortical thickening, and tumor size greater than 4 cm indicate chondrosarcoma over enchondroma of the fibula. Radiographs demonstrating more than one of the identified malignant features are more likely to be due to chondrosarcoma than radiographs demonstrating none or only one of the identified features. No unique malignant features of chondrosarcoma in the fibula were observed when compared to previous descriptions of these tumors in the long and short tubular bones of the appendicular skeleton.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Unni KK. Dahlin’s bone tumors: general aspects and data on 11,087 cases. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott–Raven, 1996 Unni KK. Dahlin’s bone tumors: general aspects and data on 11,087 cases. Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott–Raven, 1996
2.
go back to reference Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular Skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics 1998; 18:1213–1237.PubMed Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular Skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics 1998; 18:1213–1237.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Geirnaerdt MJA, Hermans J, Bloem JL, Kroon HM, Pope TL, Taminiau AHM, Hogendoorn PCW. Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1097–1104.PubMed Geirnaerdt MJA, Hermans J, Bloem JL, Kroon HM, Pope TL, Taminiau AHM, Hogendoorn PCW. Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1097–1104.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Wang XL, De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AMA, Marck EV. Low-grade chondrosarcoma vs enchondroma: challenges in diagnosis and management. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1054–1057.CrossRefPubMed Wang XL, De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AMA, Marck EV. Low-grade chondrosarcoma vs enchondroma: challenges in diagnosis and management. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1054–1057.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Giudici MA, Moser, Jr. RP, Kransdorf MJ. Cartilaginous bone tumors. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1993; 31(2). Giudici MA, Moser, Jr. RP, Kransdorf MJ. Cartilaginous bone tumors. Radiologic Clinics of North America 1993; 31(2).
6.
go back to reference Brien EW, Mirra JM, Kerr R. Benign and malignant cartilage tumors of bone and joint: their anatomic and theoretical basis with an emphasis on radiology, pathology, and clinical biology. Skeletal Radiology 1997; 26:325–353.CrossRefPubMed Brien EW, Mirra JM, Kerr R. Benign and malignant cartilage tumors of bone and joint: their anatomic and theoretical basis with an emphasis on radiology, pathology, and clinical biology. Skeletal Radiology 1997; 26:325–353.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rosenthal DI, Schiller AL, Mankin HJ. Chondrosarcoma: Correlation of radiological and histological grade. Radiology 1984; 150:21–26. Rosenthal DI, Schiller AL, Mankin HJ. Chondrosarcoma: Correlation of radiological and histological grade. Radiology 1984; 150:21–26.
8.
go back to reference Bjornsson J, McLeod RA, Unni KK, Ilstrup DM, Pritchard DJ. Primary Chondrosarcoma of long bones and limb girdles. Cancer 1998; 83:2105–2119.PubMed Bjornsson J, McLeod RA, Unni KK, Ilstrup DM, Pritchard DJ. Primary Chondrosarcoma of long bones and limb girdles. Cancer 1998; 83:2105–2119.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cawte TG, Steiner GC, Beltran J, Dorfman HD. Chondrosarcoma of the short tubular bones of the hands and feet. Skeletal Radiology 1998; 27:625–632.CrossRefPubMed Cawte TG, Steiner GC, Beltran J, Dorfman HD. Chondrosarcoma of the short tubular bones of the hands and feet. Skeletal Radiology 1998; 27:625–632.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ogose A, Unni KK, Swee RG, May GK, Rowland CM, Sim FH. Chondrosarcoma of small bones of the hands and feet. Cancer 1997; 80:50–59.CrossRefPubMed Ogose A, Unni KK, Swee RG, May GK, Rowland CM, Sim FH. Chondrosarcoma of small bones of the hands and feet. Cancer 1997; 80:50–59.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Radiographic differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma in the fibula
Authors
Scott D. Kendell
Mark S. Collins
Mark C. Adkins
Murali Sundaram
Krishnan K. Unni
Publication date
01-08-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 8/2004
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-004-0791-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2004

Skeletal Radiology 8/2004 Go to the issue