Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2018

Open Access 01-09-2018 | Original Article

Radioembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that have previously received liver-directed therapies

Authors: Bruno Sangro, Carlo Ludovico Maini, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Roberto Cianni, Rita Golfieri, Daniele Gasparini, Samer Ezziddin, Philipp M. Paprottka, Francesco Fiore, Mark Van Buskirk, Jose Ignacio Bilbao, Rita Salvatori, Emanuela Giampalma, Onelio Geatti, Kai Wilhelm, Ralf Thorsten Hoffmann, Francesco Izzo, Mercedes Iñarrairaegui, Carlo Urigo, Alberta Cappelli, Alessandro Vit, Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar, Tobias Franz Jakobs, Rosa Sciuto, Giuseppe Pizzi, Secondo Lastoria, on behalf of the European Network on Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres (ENRY)

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 10/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Radioembolisation is part of the multimodal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at specialist liver centres. This study analysed the impact of prior treatment on tolerability and survival following radioembolisation.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of 325 consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HCC, who received radioembolisation with yttrium-90 resin microspheres at eight European centres between September 2003 and December 2009. The decision to treat was based on the clinical judgement of multidisciplinary teams. Patients were followed from the date of radioembolisation to last contact or death and the nature and severity of all adverse events (AEs) recorded from medical records.

Results

Most radioembolisation candidates were Child-Pugh class A (82.5%) with multinodular HCC (75.9%) invading both lobes (53.1%); 56.3% were advanced stage. Radioembolisation was used first-line in 57.5% of patients and second-line in 34.2%. Common prior procedures were transarterial (chemo)embolisation therapies (27.1%), surgical resection/transplantation (17.2%) and ablation (8.6%). There was no difference in AE incidence and severity between prior treatment subgroups. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) survival following radioembolisation was similar between procedure-naive and prior treatment groups for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A: 22.1 months (15.1–45.9) versus 30.9 months (19.6–46.8); p = 0.243); stage B: 18.4 months (11.2–19.4) versus 22.8 months (10.9–34.2); p = 0.815; and stage C: 8.8 months (7.1–10.8) versus 10.8 months (7.7–12.6); p = 0.976.

Conclusions

Radioembolisation is a valuable treatment option for patients who relapse following surgical, ablative or vascular procedures and remain suitable candidates for this treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Crissien AM, Frenette C. Current management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2014;10(3):153–61.PubMedCentral Crissien AM, Frenette C. Current management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2014;10(3):153–61.PubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Sangro B, Carpanese L, Cianni R, Golfieri R, Gasparini D, Ezziddin S, et al. Survival after yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across Barcelona clinic liver cancer stages: a European evaluation. Hepatology. 2011;54(3):868–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24451.CrossRefPubMed Sangro B, Carpanese L, Cianni R, Golfieri R, Gasparini D, Ezziddin S, et al. Survival after yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across Barcelona clinic liver cancer stages: a European evaluation. Hepatology. 2011;54(3):868–78. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hep.​24451.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kennedy A, Coldwell D, Sangro B, Wasan H, Salem R. Radioembolization for the treatment of liver tumors general principles. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012;35(1):91–9.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy A, Coldwell D, Sangro B, Wasan H, Salem R. Radioembolization for the treatment of liver tumors general principles. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012;35(1):91–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Johnson GE, Monsky WL, Valji K, Hippe DS, Padia SA. Yttrium-90 radioembolization as a salvage treatment following chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(8):1123–9.CrossRefPubMed Johnson GE, Monsky WL, Valji K, Hippe DS, Padia SA. Yttrium-90 radioembolization as a salvage treatment following chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(8):1123–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Vilgrain V, Pereira H, Assenat E, Guiu B, Ilonca AD, Pageaux GP, et al. Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30683-6. Vilgrain V, Pereira H, Assenat E, Guiu B, Ilonca AD, Pageaux GP, et al. Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(17)30683-6.
21.
go back to reference Chow PHW, Gandhi M. Asia-Pacific Hepatocellular Carcinoma Trials Group. Phase III multi-centre open-label randomized controlled trial of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) versus sorafenib in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The SIRveNIB study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(Suppl):A4002.CrossRef Chow PHW, Gandhi M. Asia-Pacific Hepatocellular Carcinoma Trials Group. Phase III multi-centre open-label randomized controlled trial of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) versus sorafenib in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The SIRveNIB study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(Suppl):A4002.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lau WY, Leung WT, Ho S, Leung NW, Chan M, Lin J, et al. Treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic arterial yttrium-90 microspheres: a phase I and II study. Br J Cancer. 1994;70(5):994–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lau WY, Leung WT, Ho S, Leung NW, Chan M, Lin J, et al. Treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic arterial yttrium-90 microspheres: a phase I and II study. Br J Cancer. 1994;70(5):994–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Garin E, Rolland Y, Pracht M, Le Sourd S, Laffont S, Mesbah H, et al. High impact of macroaggregated albumin-based tumour dose on response and overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with (90) Y-loaded glass microsphere radioembolization. Liver Int. 2017;37(1):101–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13220.CrossRefPubMed Garin E, Rolland Y, Pracht M, Le Sourd S, Laffont S, Mesbah H, et al. High impact of macroaggregated albumin-based tumour dose on response and overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with (90) Y-loaded glass microsphere radioembolization. Liver Int. 2017;37(1):101–10. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​liv.​13220.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Radioembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that have previously received liver-directed therapies
Authors
Bruno Sangro
Carlo Ludovico Maini
Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Roberto Cianni
Rita Golfieri
Daniele Gasparini
Samer Ezziddin
Philipp M. Paprottka
Francesco Fiore
Mark Van Buskirk
Jose Ignacio Bilbao
Rita Salvatori
Emanuela Giampalma
Onelio Geatti
Kai Wilhelm
Ralf Thorsten Hoffmann
Francesco Izzo
Mercedes Iñarrairaegui
Carlo Urigo
Alberta Cappelli
Alessandro Vit
Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar
Tobias Franz Jakobs
Rosa Sciuto
Giuseppe Pizzi
Secondo Lastoria
on behalf of the European Network on Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres (ENRY)
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3968-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2018 Go to the issue