Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Imaging 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Radiation Protection | Technical advance

Radiation exposure of a mobile 3D C-arm with large flat-panel detector for intraoperative imaging and navigation - an experimental study using an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom

Authors: Yashar Naseri, Ulrich Hubbe, Christoph Scholz, Johannes Brönner, Marie T. Krüger, Jan-Helge Klingler

Published in: BMC Medical Imaging | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intraoperative 3-dimensional (3D) navigation is increasingly being used for pedicle screw placement. For this purpose, dedicated mobile 3D C-arms are capable of providing intraoperative fluoroscopy-based 3D image data sets. Modern 3D C-arms have a large field of view, which suggests a higher radiation exposure. In this experimental study we therefore investigate the radiation exposure of a new mobile 3D C-arm with large flat-panel detector to a previously reported device with regular flat-panel detector on an Alderson phantom.

Methods

We measured the radiation exposure of the Vision RFD 3D (large 30 × 30 cm detector) while creating 3D image sets as well as standard fluoroscopic images of the cervical and lumbar spine using an Alderson phantom. The dosemeter readings were then compared with the radiation exposure of the previous model Vision FD Vario 3D (smaller 20 × 20 cm detector), which had been examined identically in advance and published elsewhere.

Results

The larger 3D C-arm induced lower radiation exposures at all dosemeter sites in cervical 3D scans as well as at the sites of eye lenses and thyroid gland in lumbar 3D scans. At ​​male and especially female gonads in lumbar 3D scans, however, the larger 3D C-arm showed higher radiation exposures compared with the smaller 3D C-arm. In lumbar fluoroscopic images, the dosemeters near/in the radiation field measured a higher radiation exposure using the larger 3D C-arm.

Conclusions

The larger 3D C-arm offers the possibility to reduce radiation exposures for specific applications despite its larger flat-panel detector with a larger field of view. However, due to the considerably higher radiation exposure of the larger 3D C-arm during lumbar 3D scans, the smaller 3D C-arm is to be recommended for short-distance instrumentations (mono- and bilevel) from a radiation protection point of view. The larger 3D C-arm with its enlarged 3D image set might be used for long instrumentations of the lumbar spine. From a radiation protection perspective, the use of the respective 3D C-arm should be based on the presented data and the respective application.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adamczak SE, Bova FJ, Hoh DJ. Intraoperative 3D computed tomography: spine surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017;28:585–94.CrossRef Adamczak SE, Bova FJ, Hoh DJ. Intraoperative 3D computed tomography: spine surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017;28:585–94.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Riis J, Lehman RR, Perera RA, Quinn JR, Rinehart P, Tuten HR, et al. A retrospective comparison of intraoperative CT and fluoroscopy evaluating radiation exposure in posterior spinal fusions for scoliosis. Patient Saf Surg. 2017;11:32–6.CrossRef Riis J, Lehman RR, Perera RA, Quinn JR, Rinehart P, Tuten HR, et al. A retrospective comparison of intraoperative CT and fluoroscopy evaluating radiation exposure in posterior spinal fusions for scoliosis. Patient Saf Surg. 2017;11:32–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Klingler JH, Sircar R, Scheiwe C, Kogias E, Krüger MT, Scholz C, et al. Comparative study of C-arms for intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging and navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery part II - radiation exposure. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:E669–76.CrossRef Klingler JH, Sircar R, Scheiwe C, Kogias E, Krüger MT, Scholz C, et al. Comparative study of C-arms for intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging and navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery part II - radiation exposure. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:E669–76.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Narain AS, Hijji FY, Yom KH, Kudaravalli KT, Haws BE, Singh K. Radiation exposure and reduction in the operating room: perspectives and future directions in spine surgery. World J Orthop. 2017;8:524–30.CrossRef Narain AS, Hijji FY, Yom KH, Kudaravalli KT, Haws BE, Singh K. Radiation exposure and reduction in the operating room: perspectives and future directions in spine surgery. World J Orthop. 2017;8:524–30.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mroz TE, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, Klineberg EO, Lieberman IH. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24:264–7.CrossRef Mroz TE, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, Klineberg EO, Lieberman IH. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24:264–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Guberina N, Dietrich U, Arweiler-Harbeck D, Forsting M, Ringelstein A. Comparison of radiation doses imparted during 128-, 256-, 384-multislice CT-scanners and cone beam computed tomography for intra- and perioperative cochlear implant assessment. Am J Otolaryngol. 2017;38:649–53.CrossRef Guberina N, Dietrich U, Arweiler-Harbeck D, Forsting M, Ringelstein A. Comparison of radiation doses imparted during 128-, 256-, 384-multislice CT-scanners and cone beam computed tomography for intra- and perioperative cochlear implant assessment. Am J Otolaryngol. 2017;38:649–53.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Klingler JH, Sircar R, Scheiwe C, Kogias E, Volz F, Krüger MT, et al. Comparative study of C-arms for intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging and navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery part I - applicability and image quality. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:276–84.CrossRef Klingler JH, Sircar R, Scheiwe C, Kogias E, Volz F, Krüger MT, et al. Comparative study of C-arms for intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging and navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery part I - applicability and image quality. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:276–84.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008. Evaluation of measurement data - guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. GUM 1995 with minor corrections. JCGM. 2008;100:1–120. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008. Evaluation of measurement data - guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. GUM 1995 with minor corrections. JCGM. 2008;100:1–120.
9.
go back to reference Mahesh M. Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographics. 2001;21:1033–45.CrossRef Mahesh M. Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographics. 2001;21:1033–45.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Radiation exposure of a mobile 3D C-arm with large flat-panel detector for intraoperative imaging and navigation - an experimental study using an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom
Authors
Yashar Naseri
Ulrich Hubbe
Christoph Scholz
Johannes Brönner
Marie T. Krüger
Jan-Helge Klingler
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00495-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Medical Imaging 1/2020 Go to the issue