Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 8/2021

01-08-2021 | Radiation Protection | Laboratory Investigation

Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Caps for Lowering dose to the Brain and the Eye Lenses

Authors: Ewald Guni, Ingo Hellmann, Michael Wucherer, Petra Knappe-Kagan, Josefin Hartmann, Michael Lell, Ralf Adamus

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This work was designed to study the effectiveness of radiation protection caps in lowering the dose to the brain and the eye lens during fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Materials and Methods

Two types of radiation protection caps were examined with regards to their capacity to lower the radiation dose. One cap is equipped with lateral flaps, the other one is not. These caps were fitted to the head of an anthropomorphic Alderson-Rando (A.-R.) phantom. The phantom was positioned aside an angiographic table simulating the position of the first operator during a peripheral arterial intervention. One of the brain slices and both eyes of the A.-R. phantom were equipped with thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs).

Results

The analysis of the data showed that the cap without lateral flaps reduced the dose to the brain by 11,5–27,5 percent depending on the position within the brain. The cap with lateral protection flaps achieved a shielding effect between 44,7 and 78,9 percent. When evaluating the dose to the eye, we did see an increase of dose reduction from 63,3 to 66,5 percent in the left eye and from 45,8 to 46,8 percent in the right eye for the cap without lateral protection. When wearing the cap with lateral protection we observed an increase of dose reduction from 63,4 to 67,2 percent in the left eye and from 45,8 to 50,0 percent in the right eye.

Conclusion

Radiation protection caps can be an effective tool to reduce the dose to the brain and the eyes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jaschke W, Schmuth M, Trianni A, et al. Radiation-induced skin injuries to patients: what the interventional radiologist needs to know. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40:1131–40.CrossRef Jaschke W, Schmuth M, Trianni A, et al. Radiation-induced skin injuries to patients: what the interventional radiologist needs to know. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40:1131–40.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vano E, Escaned J, Vano-Galvan S, et al. Importance of a patient dosimetry and clinical follow-up program in the detection of radiodermatitis after long percutaneous coronary interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36:330–7.CrossRef Vano E, Escaned J, Vano-Galvan S, et al. Importance of a patient dosimetry and clinical follow-up program in the detection of radiodermatitis after long percutaneous coronary interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36:330–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Roguin S, Goldstein J, Bar O. Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature. EuroIntervention. 2012;7:1081–6.CrossRef Roguin S, Goldstein J, Bar O. Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature. EuroIntervention. 2012;7:1081–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Roguin S, Goldstein J, Bar O, et al. Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1368–72.CrossRef Roguin S, Goldstein J, Bar O, et al. Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1368–72.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference European Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom on basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. OJEU. L13. 2014;57:1–73. European Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom on basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. OJEU. L13. 2014;57:1–73.
6.
go back to reference Adamus R, Loose R, Wucherer M, Uder M, Galster M. Strahlenschutz in der interventionellen radiologie. Radiologe. 2016;56:275–81.CrossRef Adamus R, Loose R, Wucherer M, Uder M, Galster M. Strahlenschutz in der interventionellen radiologie. Radiologe. 2016;56:275–81.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Galster M, Guhl C, Uder M, Adamus R. Exposition of the operator’s eye lens and efficacy of radiation shielding in fluoroscopically guided interventions. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2013;185:474–81.CrossRef Galster M, Guhl C, Uder M, Adamus R. Exposition of the operator’s eye lens and efficacy of radiation shielding in fluoroscopically guided interventions. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2013;185:474–81.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Uthoff H, Pena C, West J, et al. Evaluation of novel disposable light-weight radiation protection devices in an interventional radiology setting: a randomized controlled trial. AJR. 2013;200:915–20.CrossRef Uthoff H, Pena C, West J, et al. Evaluation of novel disposable light-weight radiation protection devices in an interventional radiology setting: a randomized controlled trial. AJR. 2013;200:915–20.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Merce MS, Korchi AM, Kobzeva L, et al. The value of protective head cap and glasses in neurointerventional radiology. J NeuroIntervent Surg. 2016;8:736–40.CrossRef Merce MS, Korchi AM, Kobzeva L, et al. The value of protective head cap and glasses in neurointerventional radiology. J NeuroIntervent Surg. 2016;8:736–40.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kirkwood ML, Arbique GM, Guild JB. Radiation brain dose to vascular surgeons during fluoroscopically guided interventions is not effectively reduced by wearing lead equivalent surgical caps. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(2):567–71.CrossRef Kirkwood ML, Arbique GM, Guild JB. Radiation brain dose to vascular surgeons during fluoroscopically guided interventions is not effectively reduced by wearing lead equivalent surgical caps. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(2):567–71.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fetterly K, Schueler B, Grams M, et al. Head and neck radiation dose and radiation safety für interventional physicians. Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(5):520–8. Fetterly K, Schueler B, Grams M, et al. Head and neck radiation dose and radiation safety für interventional physicians. Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(5):520–8.
12.
go back to reference Fetterly K, Schueler B, Grams M, et al. Estimating head and neck tissue dose from x-ray scatter to physicians performing x-ray guided cardiovascular procedures: a phantom study. J Radiol Prot. 2017;37:43–58.CrossRef Fetterly K, Schueler B, Grams M, et al. Estimating head and neck tissue dose from x-ray scatter to physicians performing x-ray guided cardiovascular procedures: a phantom study. J Radiol Prot. 2017;37:43–58.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kuon E, Birkel J, Schmitt M. Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology. Heart. 2003;89:1205–10.CrossRef Kuon E, Birkel J, Schmitt M. Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology. Heart. 2003;89:1205–10.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mayr NP, Wiesner G, Kretschmer A, et al. Assessing the level of radiation experienced by anesthesiologists during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation and protection by a lead cap. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0210872.CrossRef Mayr NP, Wiesner G, Kretschmer A, et al. Assessing the level of radiation experienced by anesthesiologists during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation and protection by a lead cap. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0210872.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Caps for Lowering dose to the Brain and the Eye Lenses
Authors
Ewald Guni
Ingo Hellmann
Michael Wucherer
Petra Knappe-Kagan
Josefin Hartmann
Michael Lell
Ralf Adamus
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02831-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 8/2021 Go to the issue