Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 6/2021

Open Access 01-06-2021 | Original Article

Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects

Authors: Dr. med. Hendrik Dapper, M.D., Prof. Dr. Marjo Wijnen-Meijer, Salome Rathfelder, Katharina Mosene, Isabelle von Kirchbauer, Dr. med. Denise Bernhardt, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Pascal O. Berberat, Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Stephanie E. Combs

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Education as part of medical education is currently changing rapidly. Not least because of the corona crisis, more and more digital teaching formats and innovative teaching concepts such as the flipped classroom model are finding their way into teaching. We analyzed the acceptance and effectiveness of traditional teaching methods as well as the interest in innovative e‑learning methods among medical students in the field of radiation oncology at the medical school of the Technical University of Munich.

Methods

We carried out an online-based survey as well as a knowledge test on all students from two terms who had completed the seminar series of radiation oncology. The survey comprised seven questions on the frequency of participation, acceptance, and judgment of the effectiveness in terms of learning and on a potential use of e‑learning methods using a six-point Likert scale. The test consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions.

Results

Traditional teaching methods are largely accepted by students and most students consider the current learning format to be effective in terms of the teaching effect in the field of radiation oncology. However, only about 50% of all knowledge questions were answered correctly. The possible use of e‑learning methods was judged critically or desired in roughly equal parts among the students.

Conclusion

Traditional seminars enjoy a high level of acceptance among students. Effectiveness with regard to the internalization of content taught, however, should be increased. After all, the future seems to lie in the integration of e‑learning in the form of educational videos and practical seminars.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Oertel M, Linde P, Mäurer M et al (2020) Quality of teaching radiation oncology in Germany-where do we stand? : Results from a 2019 survey performed by the working group “young DEGRO” of the German Society of Radiation Oncology. Strahlenther Onkol 196(8):699–704CrossRef Oertel M, Linde P, Mäurer M et al (2020) Quality of teaching radiation oncology in Germany-where do we stand? : Results from a 2019 survey performed by the working group “young DEGRO” of the German Society of Radiation Oncology. Strahlenther Onkol 196(8):699–704CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Williams DE (2016) The Future of Medical Education: Flipping the Classroom and Education Technology. Ochsner J 16(1):14–15PubMedPubMedCentral Williams DE (2016) The Future of Medical Education: Flipping the Classroom and Education Technology. Ochsner J 16(1):14–15PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Gehlen-Baum V, Weinberger A (2012) Notebook or Facebook? How students actually use mobile devices in large lectures. In: Hutchison D, Kanade T, Kittler J et al (eds) 21 century learning for 21 century skills 7th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2012, Saarbrücken, 18–21.09. Springer, Berlin, pp 103–112 (Proceedings)CrossRef Gehlen-Baum V, Weinberger A (2012) Notebook or Facebook? How students actually use mobile devices in large lectures. In: Hutchison D, Kanade T, Kittler J et al (eds) 21 century learning for 21 century skills 7th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2012, Saarbrücken, 18–21.09. Springer, Berlin, pp 103–112 (Proceedings)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Williams DE (2016) The future of medical education: flipping the classroom and education technology. Ochsner J 16(1):14–15PubMedPubMedCentral Williams DE (2016) The future of medical education: flipping the classroom and education technology. Ochsner J 16(1):14–15PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Wannenmacher M, Wenz F, Debus J (eds) (2013) Strahlentherapie, 2nd edn. Springer-Medizin, Berlin (Mit 298 Tabellen) Wannenmacher M, Wenz F, Debus J (eds) (2013) Strahlentherapie, 2nd edn. Springer-Medizin, Berlin (Mit 298 Tabellen)
16.
go back to reference Oertel M, Schmitz M, Becker JC et al (2019) Erfolgreiche Integration der Radioonkologie in die präklinische medizinische Ausbildung : Erfahrungen mit einem interdisziplinären Lehrprojekt (Successful integration of radiation oncology in preclinical medical education : Experiences with an interdisciplinary training project). Strahlenther Onkol 195(12):1104–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01492-zCrossRefPubMed Oertel M, Schmitz M, Becker JC et al (2019) Erfolgreiche Integration der Radioonkologie in die präklinische medizinische Ausbildung : Erfahrungen mit einem interdisziplinären Lehrprojekt (Successful integration of radiation oncology in preclinical medical education : Experiences with an interdisciplinary training project). Strahlenther Onkol 195(12):1104–1109. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00066-019-01492-zCrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Widulle W (2009) Handlungsorientiert Lernen im Studium. Arbeitsbuch für soziale und pädagogische Berufe, 1st edn. VS, WiesbadenCrossRef Widulle W (2009) Handlungsorientiert Lernen im Studium. Arbeitsbuch für soziale und pädagogische Berufe, 1st edn. VS, WiesbadenCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kolb DA (1984) Experimental learning. Experience as the source of learning and development vol 1. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, London Kolb DA (1984) Experimental learning. Experience as the source of learning and development vol 1. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, London
33.
go back to reference Bouwmeester RAM, de Kleijn RAM, van den Berg IET et al (2019) Flipping the medical classroom: effect on workload, interactivity, motivation and retention of knowledge. Comput Educ 139(1):118–128CrossRef Bouwmeester RAM, de Kleijn RAM, van den Berg IET et al (2019) Flipping the medical classroom: effect on workload, interactivity, motivation and retention of knowledge. Comput Educ 139(1):118–128CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Cantillon P, Wood DF, Yardley S (2017) ABC of learning and teaching in medicine, 3rd edn. ABC series. Wiley, Hoboken Cantillon P, Wood DF, Yardley S (2017) ABC of learning and teaching in medicine, 3rd edn. ABC series. Wiley, Hoboken
Metadata
Title
Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects
Authors
Dr. med. Hendrik Dapper, M.D.
Prof. Dr. Marjo Wijnen-Meijer
Salome Rathfelder
Katharina Mosene
Isabelle von Kirchbauer
Dr. med. Denise Bernhardt
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Pascal O. Berberat
Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Stephanie E. Combs
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01712-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 6/2021 Go to the issue