Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 11/2012

01-11-2012

Questionnaire Versus Telephone Follow-up to Detect Postdischarge Complications in Surgical Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors: Annelies Visser, Dirk T. Ubbink, Dirk J. Gouma, J. Carel Goslings

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Postdischarge complications in surgical patients are usually recorded only when readmission is required, a method that likely underestimates the overall complication rate. Our aim was to determine which method—telephone interview or questionnaire by mail—collects the most postdischarge complications.

Methods

We performed a randomized clinical equivalence trial. From December 2008 until August 2009, all adult surgical patients admitted to a university hospital were randomized to be approached by mail or by phone 30 days after discharge to collect information about postdischarge complications. Primary outcome was the total number of reported complications after discharge. Secondary outcome was the severity of the complications.

Results

In all, 1595 patients were reached: 890 by means of a telephone interview and 705 through a questionnaire. Response rate was higher in the telephone group than in the questionnaire group (63.8 % vs. 51.3 %). The percentage of patients reporting one or more complications did not differ significantly between the groups: 43.3 % in the telephone group versus 39.6 % in the questionnaire group. Length of stay, American Society of Anesthesiologist class, and type of surgery—but not the survey techniques compared here—significantly influenced the number of complications reported. The percentage of patient-reported complications requiring treatment did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusions

The two survey methods did not differ in their ability to appreciate postdischarge complications as reported by the patients. The decision to use either method may be determined by the institution, costs involved, and labor requirement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kievit J, Krukerink M, Marang-van de Mheen PJ (2010) Surgical adverse outcome reporting as part of the routine clinical care. Qual Saf Health Care 19:e20PubMed Kievit J, Krukerink M, Marang-van de Mheen PJ (2010) Surgical adverse outcome reporting as part of the routine clinical care. Qual Saf Health Care 19:e20PubMed
2.
go back to reference Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376PubMedCrossRef Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, David ML et al (2000) Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 38:261–271PubMedCrossRef Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, David ML et al (2000) Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 38:261–271PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR et al (1999) Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado. Inquiry 36:255–265PubMed Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR et al (1999) Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado. Inquiry 36:255–265PubMed
5.
go back to reference Healy MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM et al (2002) Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg 137:611–618CrossRef Healy MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM et al (2002) Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg 137:611–618CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marang van de Mheenen PJ, Kievit J (2003) Automated registration of adverse events in surgical patients in The Netherlands: the current status. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 147:1273–1277 Marang van de Mheenen PJ, Kievit J (2003) Automated registration of adverse events in surgical patients in The Netherlands: the current status. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 147:1273–1277
8.
go back to reference Kaasschieter EG, van Olden GJ (2007) Complicatieregistratie en fractuurbehandeling. Ned TijdschrTrauma 6:182–185 (in Dutch) Kaasschieter EG, van Olden GJ (2007) Complicatieregistratie en fractuurbehandeling. Ned TijdschrTrauma 6:182–185 (in Dutch)
9.
go back to reference Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van Duijn-Bakker N, Kievit J (2008) Adverse outcome after discharge: occurrence, treatment and determinants. Qual Saf Health Care 17:47–52PubMedCrossRef Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van Duijn-Bakker N, Kievit J (2008) Adverse outcome after discharge: occurrence, treatment and determinants. Qual Saf Health Care 17:47–52PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mistiaen P, Poot E (2006) Telephone follow-up, initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for postdischarge problems in patients discharged from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD004510 Mistiaen P, Poot E (2006) Telephone follow-up, initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for postdischarge problems in patients discharged from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD004510
11.
go back to reference D’Amore J, Murray J, Powers H et al (2011) Does telephone follow-up predict patient satisfaction and readmission? Popul Health Manag 14:249–255PubMedCrossRef D’Amore J, Murray J, Powers H et al (2011) Does telephone follow-up predict patient satisfaction and readmission? Popul Health Manag 14:249–255PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Swanborn PG (1981) De enquête. In: Methode van Sociaal-wetenschappelijk Onderzoek. Boom, Meppel, The Netherlands, pp 265–313 (in Dutch) Swanborn PG (1981) De enquête. In: Methode van Sociaal-wetenschappelijk Onderzoek. Boom, Meppel, The Netherlands, pp 265–313 (in Dutch)
13.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D et al (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c332PubMedCrossRef Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D et al (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c332PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classifications of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 11:518–526 Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classifications of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 11:518–526
15.
go back to reference Story SK, Chamberlain RS (2009) A comprehensive review of evidence-based strategies to prevent and treat postoperative ileus. Dig Surg 26:265–275PubMedCrossRef Story SK, Chamberlain RS (2009) A comprehensive review of evidence-based strategies to prevent and treat postoperative ileus. Dig Surg 26:265–275PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, van der Zaag E et al (2009) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs. open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery program. Colorectal Dis 11:335–343PubMedCrossRef Vlug MS, Wind J, van der Zaag E et al (2009) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs. open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery program. Colorectal Dis 11:335–343PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hing CB, Smith TO, Hooper L et al (2011) A review of how to conduct a surgical survey using a questionnaire. Knee 18:209–213PubMedCrossRef Hing CB, Smith TO, Hooper L et al (2011) A review of how to conduct a surgical survey using a questionnaire. Knee 18:209–213PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ et al (2009) Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:MR000008 Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ et al (2009) Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:MR000008
19.
go back to reference Dambrink JH, Hermanides R, Beuving D et al (2010) Op zoek naar late complicaties. Med Contact 65:1536–1539 (in Dutch) Dambrink JH, Hermanides R, Beuving D et al (2010) Op zoek naar late complicaties. Med Contact 65:1536–1539 (in Dutch)
Metadata
Title
Questionnaire Versus Telephone Follow-up to Detect Postdischarge Complications in Surgical Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial
Authors
Annelies Visser
Dirk T. Ubbink
Dirk J. Gouma
J. Carel Goslings
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1740-8

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

World Journal of Surgery 11/2012 Go to the issue