Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research article

Quantitative measurements of inequality in geographic accessibility to pediatric care in Oita Prefecture, Japan: Standardization with complete spatial randomness

Authors: Susumu Tanimura, Masayuki Shima

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A quantitative measurement of inequality in geographic accessibility to pediatric care as well as that of mean distance or travel time is very important for priority setting to ensure fair access to pediatric facilities. However, conventional techniques for measuring inequality is inappropriate in geographic settings. Since inequality measures of access distance or travel time is strongly influenced by the background geographic distribution patterns, they cannot be directly used for regional comparisons of geographic accessibility. The objective of this study is to resolve this issue by using a standardization approach.

Methods

Travel times to the nearest pediatric care were calculated for all children in Oita Prefecture, Japan. Relative mean differences were considered as the inequality measure for secondary medical service areas, and were standardized with an expected value estimated from a Monte Carlo simulation based on complete spatial randomness.

Results

The observed mean travel times in the area considered averaged 4.50 minutes, ranging from 1.83 to 7.02 minutes. The mean of the observed inequality measure was 1.1, ranging from 0.9 to 1.3. The expected values of the inequality measure varied according to the background geographic distribution pattern of children, which ranged from 0.3 to 0.7. After standardizing the observed inequality measure with the expected one, we found that the ranks of the inequality measure were reversed for the observed areas.

Conclusions

Using the indicator proposed in this paper, it is possible to compare the inequality in geographic accessibility among regions. Such a comparison may facilitate priority setting in health policy and planning.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Ding H, Koinuma N, Ito M, Nakamura T: Strategies for improving pediatric services in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2005, 206: 195-202. 10.1620/tjem.206.195.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Mastuo N, Takayama JI, Takemura K, Kamoshita S: Japanese National Strategic Plan for Medial Care and Maternal and Child Health Care. Japan Medical Association Journal. 2005, 48: 283-290.
3.
Hakui T: Problems in Medical Care Services for Children. Japan Medical Association Journal. 2005, 48: 271-475.
4.
Kamoshita S: Ishi-kajo-jidai no shonikai-sankai-busoku. The Journal of the Japan Medical Association. 2003, 130: 275.
5.
Luo W, Wang F: Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 2003, 30 (6): 865-884. 10.1068/b29120.CrossRef
6.
Yang D, Goerge R, Mullner R: Comparing GIS-based methods of measuring spatial accessibility to health services. J Med Syst. 2006, 30: 23-32. 10.1007/s10916-006-7400-5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Luo W, Qi Y: An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians. Health Place. 2009, 15 (4): 1100-1107. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.002.CrossRefPubMed
8.
McGrail M, Humphreys J: Measuring spatial accessibility to primary care in rural areas: improving the effectiveness of the two-step floating catchment area method. Appl Geogr. 2009, 29 (4): 533-541. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.12.003.CrossRef
9.
10.
Cromley EK, McLafferty SL: GIS and Public Health. 2002, New York: The Guilford Press, 1
11.
Ricketts TC, Savitz LA: Geographic Methods for Health Services Research: A Focus on the Rural-Urban Continuum. 1994, Langham: University Press of America
12.
Waters HR: Measuring equity in access to health care. Soc Sci Med. 2000, 51: 599-612. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00003-4.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Cowell FA: Measuring Inequality. 1977, Oxford: Allan
15.
Atkinson AB, Micklewright J: Economic Transformation in Eastern Europe and the Distribution If Income. Cambridge University Press. 1992
16.
17.
18.
19.
Hewko J, Smoyer-Tomic K, Hodgson M: Measuring neighbourhood spatial accessibility to urban amenities: does aggregation error matter?. Environ Plan A. 2002, 34 (7): 1185-1206. 10.1068/a34171.CrossRef
20.
Oliver L, Schuurman N, Hall A: Comparing circular and network buffers to examine the influence of land use on walking for leisure and errands. Int J Health Geogr. 2007, 6: 41-10.1186/1476-072X-6-41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Clark S, Hemming R, Ulph D: On indices for the measurement of poverty. The Economic Journal. 1981, 91: 515-526. 10.2307/2232600.CrossRef
22.
Dalton H: The measurement of the inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal. 1920, 30: 348-361. 10.2307/2223525.CrossRef
23.
24.
Upton GJG, Fingleton B: Spatial data analysis by example. Point pattern and quantitative data. 1985, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1.
25.
Bailey TC, Gatrell AC: Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. 1995, Harlow, England: Longman Pub Group
26.
R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2009, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
27.
Bivand R: Using the R-GRASS Interface: Current Status. OSGeo Journal. 2007, 1: 36-38.
28.
Neteler M, Mitasova H: Open Source GIS: a GRASS GIS Approach. 2008, New York: SpringerCrossRef
29.
Rowlingson B, Diggle P: splancs: Spatial and Space-Time Point Pattern Analysis. 2009
30.
Costa LS, Nassi CD, Pinheiro RS, Almeida RM: Accessibility of selected hospitals and medical procedures by means of aerial and transit network-based measures. Health Serv Manage Res. 2003, 16: 136-140. 10.1258/095148403321591456.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Rosero-Bixby L: Spatial access to health care in Costa Rica and its equity: a GIS-based study. Soc Sci Med. 2004, 58: 1271-84. 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00322-8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
McGrail M, Humphreys J: The index of rural access: an innovative integrated approach for measuring primary care access. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009, 9: 124-10.1186/1472-6963-9-124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Khan A: An integrated approach to measuring potential spatial access to health care services. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1992, 26 (4): 275-287. 10.1016/0038-0121(92)90004-O.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Bamford E, Dunne L, Taylor D, Symon B, Hugo G, Wilkinson D: Accessibility to general practitioners in rural South Australia. A case study using geographic information system technology. Med J Aust. 1999, 171 (11-12): 614-6.PubMed
35.
Fortney J, Rost K, Zhang M, Warren J: The impact of geographic accessibility on the intensity and quality of depression treatment. Med Care. 1999, 37: 884-893. 10.1097/00005650-199909000-00005.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Walsh SJ, Page PH, Gesler WM: Normative Models and Healthcare Planning: Network-Based Simulations Within a Geographic Information System Environment. Health Serv Res. 1997, 32: 242-260.
37.
Haynes R, Bentham G, Lovett A, Gale S: Effects of distances to hospital and GP surgery on hospital inpatient episodes, controlling for needs and provision. Soc Sci Med. 1999, 49 (3): 425-433. 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00149-5.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Ramsbottom-Lucier M, Emmett K, Rich EC, Wilson JF: Hills, ridges, mountains, and roads: geographical factors and access to care in rural Kentucky. J Rural Health. 1996, 12: 386-394. 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1996.tb00806.x.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Schuurman N, Bérubé M, Crooks V: Measuring potential spatial access to primary health care physicians using a modified gravity model. Can Geogr. 2010, 54: 29-45. 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2009.00301.x.CrossRef
40.
Cinnamon J, Schuurman N, Crooks V: A method to determine spatial access to specialized palliative care services using GIS. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008, 8: 140-10.1186/1472-6963-8-140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Shahid R, Bertazzon S, Knudtson M, Ghali W: Comparison of distance measures in spatial analytical modeling for health service planning. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009, 9: 200-10.1186/1472-6963-9-200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Perry B, Gesler W: Physical access to primary health care in Andean Bolivia. Soc Sci Med. 2000, 50 (9): 1177-88. 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00364-0.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Lovett A, Haynes R, Sunnenberg G, Gale S: Car travel time and accessibility by bus to general practitioner services: a study using patient registers and GIS. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 55: 97-111. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00212-X.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Joseph AE, Phillips D: Accessibility and Utilization: Geographical Perspectives on Health Care Delivery. 1984, Sage Publications Ltd
45.
Goodman DC, Fisher E, Stukel TA, Chang C: The distance to community medical care and the likelihood of hospitalization: is closer always better?. Am J Public Health. 1997, 87: 1144-1150. 10.2105/AJPH.87.7.1144.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Teach S, Guagliardo M, Crain E, McCarter R, Quint D, Shao C, Joseph J: Spatial accessibility of primary care pediatric services in an urban environment: association with asthma management and outcome. Pediatrics. 2006, 117 (4): S78.PubMed
47.
Carr-Hill R, Place M, Posnett J: Access and the utilisation of healthcare services. Concentration and Choice in Health Care. 1997, London: Financial Times Healthcare
48.
Jones AP, Bentham G: Health service accessibility and deaths from asthma in 401 local authority districts in England and Wales, 1988-92. Thorax. 1997, 52: 218-222. 10.1136/thx.52.3.218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Kennedy B, Kawachi I, Prothrow-Stith D: Income distribution and mortality: cross sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United States. Br Med J. 1996, 312 (7037): 1004.CrossRef
50.
Atkinson A: On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory. 1970, 2 (3): 244-263. 10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6.CrossRef
51.
Theil H: Economics and information theory. 1967, North-Holland Amsterdam
52.
Kawachi I, Kennedy BP: The relationship of income inequality to mortality: does the choice of indicator matter?. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 45 (7): 1121-1127. 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00044-0.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Quantitative measurements of inequality in geographic accessibility to pediatric care in Oita Prefecture, Japan: Standardization with complete spatial randomness
Authors
Susumu Tanimura
Masayuki Shima
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-163

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Health Services Research 1/2011 Go to the issue

Research article

A case study of organisational cultural competence in mental healthcare

Study protocol

The effectiveness of an intervention in increasing community health clinician provision of preventive care: a study protocol of a non-randomised, multiple-baseline trial

Research article

Paucity of qualitative research in general medical and health services and policy research journals: analysis of publication rates

Research article

Non medical prescribing leads views on their role and the implementation of non medical prescribing from a multi-organisational perspective

Research article

Client satisfaction among participants in a randomized trial comparing oral methadone and injectable diacetylmorphine for long-term opioid-dependency

Research article

Emergency department documentation templates: variability in template selection and association with physical examination and test ordering in dizziness presentations