Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2013

01-02-2013

Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers: The Application of Advanced Image Processing and Analysis to Clinical and Preclinical Decision Making

Author: Jeffrey William Prescott

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The importance of medical imaging for clinical decision making has been steadily increasing over the last four decades. Recently, there has also been an emphasis on medical imaging for preclinical decision making, i.e., for use in pharamaceutical and medical device development. There is also a drive towards quantification of imaging findings by using quantitative imaging biomarkers, which can improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and reproducibility of imaged characteristics used for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. An important component of the discovery, characterization, validation and application of quantitative imaging biomarkers is the extraction of information and meaning from images through image processing and subsequent analysis. However, many advanced image processing and analysis methods are not applied directly to questions of clinical interest, i.e., for diagnostic and therapeutic decision making, which is a consideration that should be closely linked to the development of such algorithms. This article is meant to address these concerns. First, quantitative imaging biomarkers are introduced by providing definitions and concepts. Then, potential applications of advanced image processing and analysis to areas of quantitative imaging biomarker research are described; specifically, research into osteoarthritis (OA), Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cancer is presented. Then, challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker research are discussed. Finally, a conceptual framework for integrating clinical and preclinical considerations into the development of quantitative imaging biomarkers and their computer-assisted methods of extraction is presented.
Literature
1.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration: Innovation or Stagnation: Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical Products, 2004 US Food and Drug Administration: Innovation or Stagnation: Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical Products, 2004
2.
go back to reference Administration USFaD: FDA New Molecular Entities, 2011 Administration USFaD: FDA New Molecular Entities, 2011
3.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration: Innovation or Stagnation: Critical Path Opportunities Report, 2006 US Food and Drug Administration: Innovation or Stagnation: Critical Path Opportunities Report, 2006
4.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration: Innovation or stagnation: Critical Path Opportunities List, 2006 US Food and Drug Administration: Innovation or stagnation: Critical Path Opportunities List, 2006
5.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration: The Sentinel Initiative: National Strategy for Monitoring Medical Product Safety, 2008 US Food and Drug Administration: The Sentinel Initiative: National Strategy for Monitoring Medical Product Safety, 2008
6.
go back to reference Administration USFaD: Advancing Regulatory Science for Public Health: A Framework for FDA's Regulatory Science Initiative, 2010 Administration USFaD: Advancing Regulatory Science for Public Health: A Framework for FDA's Regulatory Science Initiative, 2010
9.
go back to reference Smith JJ, Sorensen AG, Thrall JH: Biomarkers in imaging: realizing radiology's future. Radiology 227:633–638, 2003PubMedCrossRef Smith JJ, Sorensen AG, Thrall JH: Biomarkers in imaging: realizing radiology's future. Radiology 227:633–638, 2003PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:89-95, 2001 Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:89-95, 2001
11.
go back to reference Burzykowski T, Molenberghs G, Buyse M: The Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., New York, 2005CrossRef Burzykowski T, Molenberghs G, Buyse M: The Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., New York, 2005CrossRef
12.
go back to reference O'Connor JPB, Jackson A, Asselin M-C, Buckley DL, Parker GJM, Jayson GC: Quantitative imaging biomarkers in the clinical development of targeted therapeutics: current and future perspectives. The Lancet Oncology 9:766–776, 2008PubMedCrossRef O'Connor JPB, Jackson A, Asselin M-C, Buckley DL, Parker GJM, Jayson GC: Quantitative imaging biomarkers in the clinical development of targeted therapeutics: current and future perspectives. The Lancet Oncology 9:766–776, 2008PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Altman RD, Gold GE: Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 15:A1–A56, 2007PubMedCrossRef Altman RD, Gold GE: Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 15:A1–A56, 2007PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Weir CJ, Walley RJ: Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review. Statistics in Medicine 25:183–203, 2006PubMedCrossRef Weir CJ, Walley RJ: Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review. Statistics in Medicine 25:183–203, 2006PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Echt DS, et al: Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med 324:781–788, 1991PubMedCrossRef Echt DS, et al: Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med 324:781–788, 1991PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Clarke LP, Sriram RD, Schilling LB: Imaging as a biomarker: standards for change measurements in therapy workshop summary. Academic Radiology 15:501–530, 2008PubMedCrossRef Clarke LP, Sriram RD, Schilling LB: Imaging as a biomarker: standards for change measurements in therapy workshop summary. Academic Radiology 15:501–530, 2008PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Morra JH, Zhuowen T, Apostolova LG, Green AE, Toga AW, Thompson PM: Comparison of AdaBoost and support vector machines for detecting Alzheimer's disease through automated hippocampal segmentation. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:30–43, 2010CrossRef Morra JH, Zhuowen T, Apostolova LG, Green AE, Toga AW, Thompson PM: Comparison of AdaBoost and support vector machines for detecting Alzheimer's disease through automated hippocampal segmentation. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:30–43, 2010CrossRef
18.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration: Critical Path Opportunities Initiated During 2006, 2007 US Food and Drug Administration: Critical Path Opportunities Initiated During 2006, 2007
19.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration: Key FDA Critical Path Activities Under Way in 2007, 2007 US Food and Drug Administration: Key FDA Critical Path Activities Under Way in 2007, 2007
20.
go back to reference Buckwalter JA: Orthopaedic Basic Science: Biology and Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2000 Buckwalter JA: Orthopaedic Basic Science: Biology and Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2000
21.
go back to reference Felson DT, et al: Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med 133:635–646, 2000PubMed Felson DT, et al: Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med 133:635–646, 2000PubMed
22.
go back to reference Eckstein F, Mosher T, Hunter D: Imaging of knee osteoarthritis: data beyond the beauty. Curr Opin Rheumatol 19:435–443, 2007PubMedCrossRef Eckstein F, Mosher T, Hunter D: Imaging of knee osteoarthritis: data beyond the beauty. Curr Opin Rheumatol 19:435–443, 2007PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference The Atlas of Standard Radiographs of Arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44 Suppl 4:iv46-iv72, 2005 The Atlas of Standard Radiographs of Arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44 Suppl 4:iv46-iv72, 2005
24.
go back to reference Eckstein F, Burstein D, Link TM: Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis. NMR Biomed 19:822–854, 2006PubMedCrossRef Eckstein F, Burstein D, Link TM: Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis. NMR Biomed 19:822–854, 2006PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Eckstein F, et al: Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14:974–983, 2006PubMedCrossRef Eckstein F, et al: Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14:974–983, 2006PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wirth W, Eckstein F: A technique for regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage thickness based on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 27:737–744, 2008CrossRef Wirth W, Eckstein F: A technique for regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage thickness based on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 27:737–744, 2008CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Gray ML, Eckstein F, Peterfy C, Dahlberg L, Kim YJ, Sorensen AG: Toward imaging biomarkers for osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res:S175-181, 2004 Gray ML, Eckstein F, Peterfy C, Dahlberg L, Kim YJ, Sorensen AG: Toward imaging biomarkers for osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res:S175-181, 2004
28.
go back to reference Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M: The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:1433–1441, 2008PubMedCrossRef Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M: The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:1433–1441, 2008PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fripp J, Crozier S, Warfield SK, Ourselin S: Automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of the articular cartilages from magnetic resonance images of the knee. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:55-64 Fripp J, Crozier S, Warfield SK, Ourselin S: Automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of the articular cartilages from magnetic resonance images of the knee. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:55-64
30.
go back to reference Dodin P, Pelletier J, Martel-Pelletier J, Abram F: Automatic human knee cartilage segmentation from 3-D magnetic resonance images. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 57:2699-2711 Dodin P, Pelletier J, Martel-Pelletier J, Abram F: Automatic human knee cartilage segmentation from 3-D magnetic resonance images. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 57:2699-2711
31.
go back to reference Yin Y, Zhang X, Williams R, Wu X, Anderson DD, Sonka M: LOGISMOS—layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces: cartilage segmentation in the knee joint. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:2023–2037, 2010CrossRef Yin Y, Zhang X, Williams R, Wu X, Anderson DD, Sonka M: LOGISMOS—layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces: cartilage segmentation in the knee joint. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:2023–2037, 2010CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Folkesson J, Dam EB, Olsen OF, Pettersen PC, Christiansen C: Segmenting articular cartilage automatically using a voxel classification approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:106–115, 2007PubMedCrossRef Folkesson J, Dam EB, Olsen OF, Pettersen PC, Christiansen C: Segmenting articular cartilage automatically using a voxel classification approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:106–115, 2007PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Williams TG, et al.: Anatomically corresponded regional analysis of cartilage in asymptomatic and osteoarthritic knees by statistical shape modelling of the bone. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:1541-1559 Williams TG, et al.: Anatomically corresponded regional analysis of cartilage in asymptomatic and osteoarthritic knees by statistical shape modelling of the bone. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:1541-1559
34.
go back to reference Andreoli TE, Carpenter CCJ, Griggs RC, Benjamin IJ: Andreoli and Carpenter's Cecil Essentials of Medicine. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2007 Andreoli TE, Carpenter CCJ, Griggs RC, Benjamin IJ: Andreoli and Carpenter's Cecil Essentials of Medicine. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2007
35.
go back to reference Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Goate AM: Alzheimer's disease: the challenge of the second century. Sci Transl Med 3:77 sr71, 2011 Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Goate AM: Alzheimer's disease: the challenge of the second century. Sci Transl Med 3:77 sr71, 2011
36.
go back to reference Hampel H, et al: Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:560–574, 2010PubMedCrossRef Hampel H, et al: Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:560–574, 2010PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Jack CR, et al: The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 27:685–691, 2008PubMedCrossRef Jack CR, et al: The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 27:685–691, 2008PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kantarci K, Jack Jr, CR: Quantitative magnetic resonance techniques as surrogate markers of Alzheimer's disease. NeuroRx 1:196–205, 2004PubMedCrossRef Kantarci K, Jack Jr, CR: Quantitative magnetic resonance techniques as surrogate markers of Alzheimer's disease. NeuroRx 1:196–205, 2004PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Martin J, Pentland A, Sclaroff S, Kikinis R: Characterization of neuropathological shape deformations. Pattern analysis and machine intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 20:97–112, 1998CrossRef Martin J, Pentland A, Sclaroff S, Kikinis R: Characterization of neuropathological shape deformations. Pattern analysis and machine intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 20:97–112, 1998CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Duchesne S, Caroli A, Geroldi C, Barillot C, Frisoni GB, Collins DL: MRI-based automated computer classification of probable AD versus normal controls. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 27:509–520, 2008CrossRef Duchesne S, Caroli A, Geroldi C, Barillot C, Frisoni GB, Collins DL: MRI-based automated computer classification of probable AD versus normal controls. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 27:509–520, 2008CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Gerber S, Tasdizen T, Thomas Fletcher P, Joshi S, Whitaker R: Manifold modeling for brain population analysis. Medical Image Analysis 14:643–653, 2010PubMedCrossRef Gerber S, Tasdizen T, Thomas Fletcher P, Joshi S, Whitaker R: Manifold modeling for brain population analysis. Medical Image Analysis 14:643–653, 2010PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Lei W, et al: Large deformation diffeomorphism and momentum based hippocampal shape discrimination in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 26:462–470, 2007CrossRef Lei W, et al: Large deformation diffeomorphism and momentum based hippocampal shape discrimination in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 26:462–470, 2007CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Sabuncu MR, Balci SK, Shenton ME, Golland P: Image-driven population analysis through mixture modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:1473–1487, 2009PubMedCrossRef Sabuncu MR, Balci SK, Shenton ME, Golland P: Image-driven population analysis through mixture modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:1473–1487, 2009PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Sabuncu MR, Yeo BTT, Van Leemput K, Fischl B, Golland P: A generative model for image segmentation based on label fusion. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:1714–1729, 2010CrossRef Sabuncu MR, Yeo BTT, Van Leemput K, Fischl B, Golland P: A generative model for image segmentation based on label fusion. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:1714–1729, 2010CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Freeborough PA, Fox NC: MR image texture analysis applied to the diagnosis and tracking of Alzheimer's disease. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 17:475–478, 1998CrossRef Freeborough PA, Fox NC: MR image texture analysis applied to the diagnosis and tracking of Alzheimer's disease. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 17:475–478, 1998CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, et al: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247, 2009PubMedCrossRef Eisenhauer EA, et al: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247, 2009PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Armato 3rd, SG, et al: The Reference Image Database to Evaluate Response to therapy in lung cancer (RIDER) project: a resource for the development of change-analysis software. Clin Pharmacol Ther 84:448–456, 2008PubMedCrossRef Armato 3rd, SG, et al: The Reference Image Database to Evaluate Response to therapy in lung cancer (RIDER) project: a resource for the development of change-analysis software. Clin Pharmacol Ther 84:448–456, 2008PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Larson SM: Imaging surrogates of tumor response to therapy: anatomic and functional biomarkers. J Nucl Med 50:239–249, 2009PubMedCrossRef Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Larson SM: Imaging surrogates of tumor response to therapy: anatomic and functional biomarkers. J Nucl Med 50:239–249, 2009PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Girvin F, Ko JP: Pulmonary nodules: detection, assessment, and CAD. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1057–1069, 2008PubMedCrossRef Girvin F, Ko JP: Pulmonary nodules: detection, assessment, and CAD. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1057–1069, 2008PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Wang TC, Karayiannis NB: Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 17:498–509, 1998CrossRef Wang TC, Karayiannis NB: Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 17:498–509, 1998CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Jong Kook K, Hyun Wook P: Statistical textural features for detection of microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 18:231–238, 1999CrossRef Jong Kook K, Hyun Wook P: Statistical textural features for detection of microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 18:231–238, 1999CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Liyang W, Yongyi Y, Nishikawa RM, Yulei J: A study on several machine-learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 24:371–380, 2005CrossRef Liyang W, Yongyi Y, Nishikawa RM, Yulei J: A study on several machine-learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 24:371–380, 2005CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Tofts PS: Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:91–101, 1997PubMedCrossRef Tofts PS: Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:91–101, 1997PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Tofts PS, et al: Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:223–232, 1999PubMedCrossRef Tofts PS, et al: Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:223–232, 1999PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Armitage P, Behrenbruch C, Brady M, Moore N: Extracting and visualizing physiological parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Medical Image Analysis 9:315–329, 2005PubMedCrossRef Armitage P, Behrenbruch C, Brady M, Moore N: Extracting and visualizing physiological parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Medical Image Analysis 9:315–329, 2005PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Schmid VJ, Whitcher B, Padhani AR, Guang-Zhong Y: Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images based on Bayesian P-splines. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 28:789–798, 2009CrossRef Schmid VJ, Whitcher B, Padhani AR, Guang-Zhong Y: Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images based on Bayesian P-splines. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 28:789–798, 2009CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Mescam M, Kretowski M, Bezy-Wendling J: Multiscale model of liver DCE-MRI towards a better understanding of tumor complexity. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:699–707, 2010CrossRef Mescam M, Kretowski M, Bezy-Wendling J: Multiscale model of liver DCE-MRI towards a better understanding of tumor complexity. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 29:699–707, 2010CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Sullivan DC, Gatsonis C: Response to treatment series: part 1 and introduction, measuring tumor response—challenges in the era of molecular medicine. Am J Roentgenol 197:15-17 Sullivan DC, Gatsonis C: Response to treatment series: part 1 and introduction, measuring tumor response—challenges in the era of molecular medicine. Am J Roentgenol 197:15-17
59.
go back to reference Yaghmai V, Miller FH, Rezai P, Benson AB, III, Salem R: Response to treatment series: part 2, tumor response assessment—using new and conventional criteria. Am J Roentgenol 197:18-27 Yaghmai V, Miller FH, Rezai P, Benson AB, III, Salem R: Response to treatment series: part 2, tumor response assessment—using new and conventional criteria. Am J Roentgenol 197:18-27
60.
go back to reference Pepe MS, et al: Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 93:1054–1061, 2001PubMedCrossRef Pepe MS, et al: Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 93:1054–1061, 2001PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers: The Application of Advanced Image Processing and Analysis to Clinical and Preclinical Decision Making
Author
Jeffrey William Prescott
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9465-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2013 Go to the issue