Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 9/2012

01-09-2012 | Original Communication

Quantitative assessment of visual behavior in disorders of consciousness

Authors: L. Trojano, P. Moretta, V. Loreto, A. Cozzolino, L. Santoro, A. Estraneo

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 9/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The study of eye behavior is of paramount importance in the differential diagnosis of disorders of consciousness (DoC). In spite of this, assessment of eye movement patterns in patients with vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) only relies on clinical evaluation. In this study we aimed to provide a quantitative assessment of visual tracking behavior in response to moving stimuli in DoC patients. Nine VS patients and nine MCS patients were recruited in a Neurorehabilitation Unit for patients with chronic DoC; 11 matched healthy subjects were tested as the control group. All participants underwent a quantitative evaluation of eye-tracking pattern by means of a computerized infrared eye-tracker system; stimuli were represented by a red circle or a small color picture slowly moving on a PC monitor. The proportion of on- or off-target fixations differed significantly between MCS and VS. Most importantly, the distribution of fixations on or off the target in all VS patients was at or below the chance level, whereas in the MCS group seven out of nine patients showed a proportion of on-target fixations significantly higher than the chance level. Fixation length did not differ among the three groups significantly. The present quantitative assessment of visual behaviour in a tracking task demonstrated that MCS and VS patients differ in the proportion of on-target fixations. These results could have important clinical implications since the quantitative analysis of visual behavior might provide additional elements in the differential diagnosis of DoC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Multi-Society Task Force on PVS (1994) Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med 330:1499–1508CrossRef Multi-Society Task Force on PVS (1994) Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med 330:1499–1508CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Royal College of Physicians (2003) The vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management. Clin Med 3:249–254 Royal College of Physicians (2003) The vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management. Clin Med 3:249–254
3.
go back to reference Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F et al (2010) Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 8:68PubMedCrossRef Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F et al (2010) Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 8:68PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N et al (2002) The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58:349–353PubMedCrossRef Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N et al (2002) The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58:349–353PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Giacino JT, Trott CT (2004) Rehabilitative management of patients with disorders of consciousness: grand rounds. J Head Trauma Rehabil 19:254–265PubMedCrossRef Giacino JT, Trott CT (2004) Rehabilitative management of patients with disorders of consciousness: grand rounds. J Head Trauma Rehabil 19:254–265PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Giacino JT (2004) The vegetative and minimally conscious states: consensus-based criteria for establishing diagnosis and prognosis. Neurorehabilitation 19:293–298PubMed Giacino JT (2004) The vegetative and minimally conscious states: consensus-based criteria for establishing diagnosis and prognosis. Neurorehabilitation 19:293–298PubMed
7.
go back to reference Giacino JT, Zasler ND, Katz DI et al (1997) Development of practice guidelines for assessment and management of the vegetative and minimally conscious states. J Head Trauma Rehabil 12:79–89CrossRef Giacino JT, Zasler ND, Katz DI et al (1997) Development of practice guidelines for assessment and management of the vegetative and minimally conscious states. J Head Trauma Rehabil 12:79–89CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lammi MH, Smith VH, Tate RL, Taylor CM (2005) The minimally conscious state and recovery potential: a follow-up study 2 to 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:746–754PubMedCrossRef Lammi MH, Smith VH, Tate RL, Taylor CM (2005) The minimally conscious state and recovery potential: a follow-up study 2 to 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:746–754PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Voss HU, Uluç AM, Dyke JP et al (2006) Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J Clin Invest 116:2005–2011PubMedCrossRef Voss HU, Uluç AM, Dyke JP et al (2006) Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J Clin Invest 116:2005–2011PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V et al (2010) Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorragic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology 75:239–245PubMedCrossRef Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V et al (2010) Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorragic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology 75:239–245PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Majerus S, Gill-Thwaites H, Andrews K, Laureys S (2005) Behavioral evaluation of consciousness in severe brain damage. Prog Brain Res 150:397–413PubMedCrossRef Majerus S, Gill-Thwaites H, Andrews K, Laureys S (2005) Behavioral evaluation of consciousness in severe brain damage. Prog Brain Res 150:397–413PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 9:35PubMedCrossRef Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 9:35PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kobylarz EJ, Schiff ND (2004) Functional imaging of severely brain-injured patients: progress, challenges, and limitations. Arch Neurol 61:1357–1360PubMedCrossRef Kobylarz EJ, Schiff ND (2004) Functional imaging of severely brain-injured patients: progress, challenges, and limitations. Arch Neurol 61:1357–1360PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Laureys S, Giacino JT, Schiff ND et al (2006) How should functional imaging of patients with disorders of consciousness contribute to their clinical rehabilitation needs? Curr Opin Neurol 19:520–527PubMedCrossRef Laureys S, Giacino JT, Schiff ND et al (2006) How should functional imaging of patients with disorders of consciousness contribute to their clinical rehabilitation needs? Curr Opin Neurol 19:520–527PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fins JJ, Master MJ, Gerber LM, Giacino JT (2007) The minimally conscious state: a diagnosis in search of an epidemiology. Arch Neurol 64:1400–1405PubMedCrossRef Fins JJ, Master MJ, Gerber LM, Giacino JT (2007) The minimally conscious state: a diagnosis in search of an epidemiology. Arch Neurol 64:1400–1405PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Katz DI, Polyak M, Coughlan D et al (2009) Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1–4 year follow-up. Prog Brain Res 177:73–88PubMedCrossRef Katz DI, Polyak M, Coughlan D et al (2009) Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1–4 year follow-up. Prog Brain Res 177:73–88PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Luauté J, Maucort-Boulch D, Tell L et al (2010) Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states. Neurology 75:246–252PubMedCrossRef Luauté J, Maucort-Boulch D, Tell L et al (2010) Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states. Neurology 75:246–252PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C, Brédart S, Laureys S (2008) Assessment of visual pursuit in post-comatose state: use a mirror. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:223PubMedCrossRef Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C, Brédart S, Laureys S (2008) Assessment of visual pursuit in post-comatose state: use a mirror. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:223PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C et al (2010) Visual fixation in the vegetative state: an observational case series PET study. BMC Neurol 10:35PubMedCrossRef Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C et al (2010) Visual fixation in the vegetative state: an observational case series PET study. BMC Neurol 10:35PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Giacino J, Whyte J (2005) The vegetative and minimally conscious states: current knowledge and remaining questions. J Head Trauma Rehabil 20:30–50PubMedCrossRef Giacino J, Whyte J (2005) The vegetative and minimally conscious states: current knowledge and remaining questions. J Head Trauma Rehabil 20:30–50PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL, Hubel DH (2004) The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:229–240PubMedCrossRef Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL, Hubel DH (2004) The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:229–240PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nagel M, Sprenger A, Hohagen F et al (2008) Cortical mechanisms of retinal and extraretinal smooth pursuit eye movements to different target velocities. NeuroImage 41:483–492PubMedCrossRef Nagel M, Sprenger A, Hohagen F et al (2008) Cortical mechanisms of retinal and extraretinal smooth pursuit eye movements to different target velocities. NeuroImage 41:483–492PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J (2004) The JFK Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:2020–2029PubMedCrossRef Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J (2004) The JFK Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:2020–2029PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ansell BJ, Keenan JE (1989) The western neuro sensory stimulation profile: a tool for assessing slow-to-recover head-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:104–108PubMed Ansell BJ, Keenan JE (1989) The western neuro sensory stimulation profile: a tool for assessing slow-to-recover head-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:104–108PubMed
25.
go back to reference Shiel A, Horn SA, Wilson BA et al (2000) The Wessex Head Injury Matrix (WHIM) main scale: a preliminary report on a scale to assess and monitor patient recovery after severe head injury. Clin Rehabil 14:408–416PubMedCrossRef Shiel A, Horn SA, Wilson BA et al (2000) The Wessex Head Injury Matrix (WHIM) main scale: a preliminary report on a scale to assess and monitor patient recovery after severe head injury. Clin Rehabil 14:408–416PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rappaport M, Dougherty AM, Kelting DL (1992) Evaluation of coma and vegetative states. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:623–638 Rappaport M, Dougherty AM, Kelting DL (1992) Evaluation of coma and vegetative states. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:623–638
27.
go back to reference Gill-Thwaites H (1997) The sensory modality assessment rehabilitation technique—a tool for assessment and treatment of patients with severe brain injury in a vegetative state. Brain Inj 11:723–734PubMedCrossRef Gill-Thwaites H (1997) The sensory modality assessment rehabilitation technique—a tool for assessment and treatment of patients with severe brain injury in a vegetative state. Brain Inj 11:723–734PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV et al (2005) Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol 58:585–593PubMedCrossRef Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV et al (2005) Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol 58:585–593PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lombardi F, Gatta G, Sacco S et al (2007) The Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Funct Neurol 22:47–61PubMed Lombardi F, Gatta G, Sacco S et al (2007) The Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Funct Neurol 22:47–61PubMed
30.
go back to reference Sacco S, Altobelli E, Pistarini C et al (2011) Validation of the Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj 25:488–495PubMedCrossRef Sacco S, Altobelli E, Pistarini C et al (2011) Validation of the Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj 25:488–495PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Injury-Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group, Disorders of Consciousness Task Force, Seel RT, Sherer M, Whyte J et al (2010) Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:1795–1813PubMedCrossRef American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Injury-Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group, Disorders of Consciousness Task Force, Seel RT, Sherer M, Whyte J et al (2010) Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:1795–1813PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Leigh IL, Zee DS (1983) The neurology of eye movements. Davis, Philadelphia Leigh IL, Zee DS (1983) The neurology of eye movements. Davis, Philadelphia
33.
go back to reference Naccache L (2009) Visual consciousness: an updated neurological tour. In: Laureys S, Tononi G (eds) The neurology of consciousness. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 271–281CrossRef Naccache L (2009) Visual consciousness: an updated neurological tour. In: Laureys S, Tononi G (eds) The neurology of consciousness. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 271–281CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Milea D, Muri RM (2004) Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex. Curr Opin Neurol 17:17–25PubMedCrossRef Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Milea D, Muri RM (2004) Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex. Curr Opin Neurol 17:17–25PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Trojano L, Moretta P, Estraneo A, Santoro L (2010) Neuropsychologic assessment and cognitive rehabilitation in a patient with locked-in syndrome and left neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:498–502PubMedCrossRef Trojano L, Moretta P, Estraneo A, Santoro L (2010) Neuropsychologic assessment and cognitive rehabilitation in a patient with locked-in syndrome and left neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:498–502PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Sharpe JA (2008) Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of smooth pursuit: lesion studies. Brain Cogn 68:241–254PubMedCrossRef Sharpe JA (2008) Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of smooth pursuit: lesion studies. Brain Cogn 68:241–254PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Pierrot-Deseilligny C (1994) Saccade and smooth-pursuit impairment after cerebral hemispheric lesions. Eur Neurol 34:121–134PubMedCrossRef Pierrot-Deseilligny C (1994) Saccade and smooth-pursuit impairment after cerebral hemispheric lesions. Eur Neurol 34:121–134PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Tollner T, Zehetleitner M, Gramann K, Muller H (2011) Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex. PLoS One 6(1):e16276PubMedCrossRef Tollner T, Zehetleitner M, Gramann K, Muller H (2011) Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex. PLoS One 6(1):e16276PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124:372–422PubMedCrossRef Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124:372–422PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Andrews K, Murphy L, Munday R, Littlewood C (1996) Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. BMJ 313:13–16PubMedCrossRef Andrews K, Murphy L, Munday R, Littlewood C (1996) Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. BMJ 313:13–16PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Giacino JT, Schnakers C, Rodriguez-Moreno D et al (2009) Behavioral assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: gold standard or fool’s gold? Prog Brain Res 177:33–48PubMedCrossRef Giacino JT, Schnakers C, Rodriguez-Moreno D et al (2009) Behavioral assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: gold standard or fool’s gold? Prog Brain Res 177:33–48PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Bernat JL (2010) Current controversies in states of chronic unconsciousness. Neurology 75(Suppl 1):S33–S38PubMedCrossRef Bernat JL (2010) Current controversies in states of chronic unconsciousness. Neurology 75(Suppl 1):S33–S38PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Majerus S, Bruno MA, Schnakers C et al (2009) The problem of aphasia in the assessment of consciousness in brain-damaged patients. Prog Brain Res 177:49–61PubMedCrossRef Majerus S, Bruno MA, Schnakers C et al (2009) The problem of aphasia in the assessment of consciousness in brain-damaged patients. Prog Brain Res 177:49–61PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantitative assessment of visual behavior in disorders of consciousness
Authors
L. Trojano
P. Moretta
V. Loreto
A. Cozzolino
L. Santoro
A. Estraneo
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6435-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2012

Journal of Neurology 9/2012 Go to the issue

Journal Club

Neuroimaging