Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Original Article

Quantification of patient-reported outcome measures of radiation-induced skin reactions for use in clinical trial design

Authors: N. S. Russell, E. van Werkhoven, S. B. Schagen

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Skin toxicity is a common effect from radiotherapy, although difficult to predict on an individual basis, and there is little evidence-based management. This study aimed to quantify inter-patient variation in patient-reported outcome measures for radiation-induced skin reactions (RISR) to enable the determination of the number of patients required for adequate power in a comparative trial of RISR management strategies.

Methods

The study included 154 patients scheduled to receive breast cancer radiotherapy. Patients filled in a weekly questionnaire during and up to 4 weeks following the end of radiotherapy scoring five aspects of their experience of RISR: skin redness, and bother from redness like itching, burning sensation and tenderness/pain.

Results

Assessment of patients’ reported experience of their RISR was shown to be feasible, with 91 % of patients returning at least two questionnaires. The mean score increase between weeks 1 and 4 was 25 points (p value <0.0001, 95 % CI 21–29), and the estimated standard deviation at 4 weeks was 18 (95 % CI 16–21).

Conclusions

Patients’ assessment of their reaction was not predicted on the basis of treatment and patient-related characteristics. Based on the observed variance in scores at 4 weeks, we could calculate the sample size required for a comparative study of two RISR management policies would be 200 patients to have statistical power to detect a clinically significant difference in patient-rated scores of their skin reactions. A trial employing this tool would help provide an evidence base to guide policy in advising patients how to manage their RISR.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chan RJ, Webster J, Chung B, et al. (2014) Prevention and treatment of acute radiation-induced skin reactions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cancer:14–53 Chan RJ, Webster J, Chung B, et al. (2014) Prevention and treatment of acute radiation-induced skin reactions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cancer:14–53
2.
go back to reference Russell NS, Knaken H, Bruinvis IA, et al. (1994) Quantification of patient to patient variation of skin erythema developing as a response to radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 30:213–221CrossRefPubMed Russell NS, Knaken H, Bruinvis IA, et al. (1994) Quantification of patient to patient variation of skin erythema developing as a response to radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 30:213–221CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tucker SL, Turesson I, Thames HD (1992) Evidence for individual differences in the radiosensitivity of human skin. Eur J Cancer 28A:1783–1791CrossRefPubMed Tucker SL, Turesson I, Thames HD (1992) Evidence for individual differences in the radiosensitivity of human skin. Eur J Cancer 28A:1783–1791CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Roper B, Kaisig D, Auer F, et al. (2004) Theta-cream versus Bepanthol lotion in breast cancer patients under radiotherapy. A new prophylactic agent in skin care? Strahlenther Onkol 180:315–322CrossRefPubMed Roper B, Kaisig D, Auer F, et al. (2004) Theta-cream versus Bepanthol lotion in breast cancer patients under radiotherapy. A new prophylactic agent in skin care? Strahlenther Onkol 180:315–322CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pignol JP, Olivotto I, Rakovitch E, et al. (2008) A multicenter randomized trial of breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy to reduce acute radiation dermatitis. J Clin Oncol 26:2085–2092CrossRefPubMed Pignol JP, Olivotto I, Rakovitch E, et al. (2008) A multicenter randomized trial of breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy to reduce acute radiation dermatitis. J Clin Oncol 26:2085–2092CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick TB (1988) The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 124:869–871CrossRefPubMed Fitzpatrick TB (1988) The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 124:869–871CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Krasin MJ, Hoth KA, Hua C, et al. (2009) Incidence and correlates of radiation dermatitis in children and adolescents receiving radiation therapy for the treatment of paediatric sarcomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 21:781–785CrossRef Krasin MJ, Hoth KA, Hua C, et al. (2009) Incidence and correlates of radiation dermatitis in children and adolescents receiving radiation therapy for the treatment of paediatric sarcomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 21:781–785CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lee TS, Kilbreath SL, Refshauge KM, et al. (2008) Quality of life of women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 16:399–405CrossRefPubMed Lee TS, Kilbreath SL, Refshauge KM, et al. (2008) Quality of life of women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 16:399–405CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Back M, Ahern V, Delaney G, et al. (2005) Absence of adverse early quality of life outcomes of radiation therapy in breast conservation therapy for early breast cancer. Australas Radiol 49:39–43CrossRefPubMed Back M, Ahern V, Delaney G, et al. (2005) Absence of adverse early quality of life outcomes of radiation therapy in breast conservation therapy for early breast cancer. Australas Radiol 49:39–43CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Begg AC, Russell NS, Knaken H, Lebesque JV (1993) Lack of correlation of human fibroblast radiosensitivity in vitro with early skin reactions in patients undergoing radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Biol 64:393–405CrossRefPubMed Begg AC, Russell NS, Knaken H, Lebesque JV (1993) Lack of correlation of human fibroblast radiosensitivity in vitro with early skin reactions in patients undergoing radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Biol 64:393–405CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Turesson I, Nyman J, Qvarnstrom F, et al. (2010) A low-dose hypersensitive keratinocyte loss in response to fractionated radiotherapy is associated with growth arrest and apoptosis. Radiother Oncol 94:90–101CrossRefPubMed Turesson I, Nyman J, Qvarnstrom F, et al. (2010) A low-dose hypersensitive keratinocyte loss in response to fractionated radiotherapy is associated with growth arrest and apoptosis. Radiother Oncol 94:90–101CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Li J, et al. (2006) Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) decreases acute skin toxicity for women receiving radiation for breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 29:66–70CrossRefPubMed Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Li J, et al. (2006) Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) decreases acute skin toxicity for women receiving radiation for breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 29:66–70CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Harsolia A, Kestin L, Grills I, et al. (2007) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy results in significant decrease in clinical toxicities compared with conventional wedge-based breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:1375–1380CrossRefPubMed Harsolia A, Kestin L, Grills I, et al. (2007) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy results in significant decrease in clinical toxicities compared with conventional wedge-based breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:1375–1380CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Morgan M, McCreedy R, Simpson J, Hay RJ (1997) Dermatology quality of life scales—a measure of the impact of skin diseases. Br J Dermatol 136:202–206CrossRefPubMed Morgan M, McCreedy R, Simpson J, Hay RJ (1997) Dermatology quality of life scales—a measure of the impact of skin diseases. Br J Dermatol 136:202–206CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference 1932;140:1–55. LR. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 1932; 140: 1–55. 1932;140:1–55. LR. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 1932; 140: 1–55.
17.
go back to reference Ozolins M, Eady EA, Avery A, et al. (2005) Randomised controlled multiple treatment comparison to provide a cost-effectiveness rationale for the selection of antimicrobial therapy in acne. Health Technol Assess 9:iii–212CrossRefPubMed Ozolins M, Eady EA, Avery A, et al. (2005) Randomised controlled multiple treatment comparison to provide a cost-effectiveness rationale for the selection of antimicrobial therapy in acne. Health Technol Assess 9:iii–212CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Uehara M, Sugiura H, Sakurai K (2001) A trial of oolong tea in the management of recalcitrant atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 137:42–43CrossRefPubMed Uehara M, Sugiura H, Sakurai K (2001) A trial of oolong tea in the management of recalcitrant atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 137:42–43CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Basch E, Iasonos A, McDonough T, et al. (2006) Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events: results of a questionnaire-based study. Lancet Oncol 7:903–909CrossRefPubMed Basch E, Iasonos A, McDonough T, et al. (2006) Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events: results of a questionnaire-based study. Lancet Oncol 7:903–909CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Quantification of patient-reported outcome measures of radiation-induced skin reactions for use in clinical trial design
Authors
N. S. Russell
E. van Werkhoven
S. B. Schagen
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3376-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine