Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 2/2014

01-04-2014 | Original Article

Quantification of median lobe protrusion and its impact on the base surgical margin status during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Authors: Chang Wook Jeong, Sangchul Lee, Jong Jin Oh, Byung Ki Lee, Jung Keun Lee, Seong Jin Jeong, Sung Kyu Hong, Seok-Soo Byun, Gheeyoung Choe, Sang Eun Lee

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Protrusion of the median lobe (PML) is thought to add technical difficulty during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Thus, we quantified PML using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and evaluated its impact on base surgical margin (BSM) status during RALP.

Methods

The clinical data of consecutive patients who underwent RALP were retrieved from a prospectively registered database. Of the 655 eligible men, 9 patients were excluded because they did not undergo MRI. PML was measured in a T2-weighted mid-sagittal scan. We performed univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results

The mean PML was 8.3 ± 3.6 mm. The rate of positive surgical margins was 17.3 % (73/423) in pathologic stage T2 and 34.6 % (226/646) in all cases. The BSMs were positive in 10.1 % (66/646) of cases. A logistic regression analysis revealed that PML was significantly correlated with BSM positivity in all cases (odds ratio [OR] 1.080, p = 0.026). In particular, they had a stronger correlation with pathologic stage T3 or higher (OR 1.1143, p = 0.004). PML was an independent predictor of BSM positivity (OR 1.113, p = 0.046) in pathologic stage T3 or higher, as were preoperative prostate-specific antigen, prostate size, and pathologic stage. Cases with 10 mm or higher PML had significantly more BSM positivity than cases with <10 mm PML (35.9 vs. 20.1 %, p = 0.012).

Conclusions

Protrusion of the median lobe measured using preoperative MRI was significantly correlated with positive BSMs during RALP. Surgeons should pay more attention to patients with 10 mm or higher PML and advanced stages.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR (2010) Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:1117–1123PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR (2010) Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:1117–1123PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Guru KA, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R et al (2009) Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons. Can J Urol 16:4736–4741 (discussion 4741)PubMed Guru KA, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R et al (2009) Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons. Can J Urol 16:4736–4741 (discussion 4741)PubMed
3.
go back to reference Meeks JJ, Zhao L, Greco KA, Macejko A, Nadler RB (2009) Impact of prostate median lobe anatomy on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 73:323–327PubMedCrossRef Meeks JJ, Zhao L, Greco KA, Macejko A, Nadler RB (2009) Impact of prostate median lobe anatomy on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 73:323–327PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Guglielmetti GB et al (2012) Does the presence of median lobe affect outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? J Endourol 26:264–270PubMedCrossRef Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Guglielmetti GB et al (2012) Does the presence of median lobe affect outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? J Endourol 26:264–270PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Huang AC, Kowalczyk KJ, Hevelone ND et al (2011) The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 59:595–603PubMedCrossRef Huang AC, Kowalczyk KJ, Hevelone ND et al (2011) The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 59:595–603PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jenkins LC, Nogueira M, Wilding GE et al (2008) Median lobe in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: evaluation and management. Urology 71:810–813PubMedCrossRef Jenkins LC, Nogueira M, Wilding GE et al (2008) Median lobe in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: evaluation and management. Urology 71:810–813PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S et al (2007) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 51:648–657 (discussion 657–8)PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S et al (2007) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 51:648–657 (discussion 657–8)PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Samaratunga H, Montironi R, True L et al (2011) International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling. Mod Pathol 24:6–15PubMedCrossRef Samaratunga H, Montironi R, True L et al (2011) International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling. Mod Pathol 24:6–15PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sarle R, Tewari A, Hemal AK, Menon M (2005) Robotic-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy: technical difficulties due to a large median lobe. Urol Int 74:92–94PubMedCrossRef Sarle R, Tewari A, Hemal AK, Menon M (2005) Robotic-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy: technical difficulties due to a large median lobe. Urol Int 74:92–94PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC et al (2012) Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol 62:368–381PubMedCrossRef Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC et al (2012) Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol 62:368–381PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Song C, Kang T, Yoo S et al (2013) Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 31:168–174PubMedCrossRef Song C, Kang T, Yoo S et al (2013) Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 31:168–174PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jeong CW, Jeong SJ, Hong SK et al (2012) Nomograms to predict the pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men: comparison with western predictive tools using decision curve analysis. Int J Urol 19:846–852 (author reply 853-4)PubMedCrossRef Jeong CW, Jeong SJ, Hong SK et al (2012) Nomograms to predict the pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men: comparison with western predictive tools using decision curve analysis. Int J Urol 19:846–852 (author reply 853-4)PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Song C, Ro JY, Lee MS et al (2006) Prostate cancer in Korean men exhibits poor differentiation and is adversely related to prognosis after radical prostatectomy. Urology 68:820–824PubMedCrossRef Song C, Ro JY, Lee MS et al (2006) Prostate cancer in Korean men exhibits poor differentiation and is adversely related to prognosis after radical prostatectomy. Urology 68:820–824PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lee JW, Ryu JH, Yoo TK, Byun SS, Jeong YJ, Jung TY (2012) Relationship between intravesical prostatic protrusion and postoperative outcomes in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 53:478–482PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lee JW, Ryu JH, Yoo TK, Byun SS, Jeong YJ, Jung TY (2012) Relationship between intravesical prostatic protrusion and postoperative outcomes in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 53:478–482PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lieber MM, Jacobson DJ, McGree ME, St. Sauver JL, Girman CJ, Jacobsen SJ (2009) Intravesical prostatic protrusion in men in Olmsted County, Minnesota. J Urol 182:2819–2824PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lieber MM, Jacobson DJ, McGree ME, St. Sauver JL, Girman CJ, Jacobsen SJ (2009) Intravesical prostatic protrusion in men in Olmsted County, Minnesota. J Urol 182:2819–2824PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Park HY, Lee JY, Park SY et al (2012) Efficacy of alpha blocker treatment according to the degree of intravesical prostatic protrusion detected by transrectal ultrasonography in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 53:92–97PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Park HY, Lee JY, Park SY et al (2012) Efficacy of alpha blocker treatment according to the degree of intravesical prostatic protrusion detected by transrectal ultrasonography in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 53:92–97PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wee JH, Choi YS, Bae WJ et al (2012) Influence of intravesical prostatic protrusion on preoperative lower urinary tract symptoms and outcomes after 120 w high performance system laser treatment in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 53:472–477PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wee JH, Choi YS, Bae WJ et al (2012) Influence of intravesical prostatic protrusion on preoperative lower urinary tract symptoms and outcomes after 120 w high performance system laser treatment in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 53:472–477PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chia SJ, Heng CT, Chan SP, Foo KT (2003) Correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int 91:371–374PubMedCrossRef Chia SJ, Heng CT, Chan SP, Foo KT (2003) Correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int 91:371–374PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yuen JS, Ngiap JT, Cheng CW, Foo KT (2002) Effects of bladder volume on transabdominal ultrasound measurements of intravesical prostatic protrusion and volume. Int J Urol 9:225–229PubMedCrossRef Yuen JS, Ngiap JT, Cheng CW, Foo KT (2002) Effects of bladder volume on transabdominal ultrasound measurements of intravesical prostatic protrusion and volume. Int J Urol 9:225–229PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantification of median lobe protrusion and its impact on the base surgical margin status during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
Authors
Chang Wook Jeong
Sangchul Lee
Jong Jin Oh
Byung Ki Lee
Jung Keun Lee
Seong Jin Jeong
Sung Kyu Hong
Seok-Soo Byun
Gheeyoung Choe
Sang Eun Lee
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1118-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

World Journal of Urology 2/2014 Go to the issue