Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Quality of survey-based study reports in dentistry

Authors: Manuel Antonio Mattos-Vela, Teresa Angélica Evaristo-Chiyong, Kariem Siquero-Vera

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surveys are a widely used research method in dentistry in different specialities. The study aimed to determine the quality of survey-based research reports published in dentistry journals from 2015 to 2019.

Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive research study was conducted. The report quality assessment was carried out through the SURGE guideline modified by Turk et al. Four journals indexed in the Web of Science were selected: BMC Oral Health, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Journal of Dental Education, and Journal of Applied Oral Science. The selection of articles was made using the PubMed database considering the following search words: questionnaire OR survey, two trained reviewers applied the guideline to the selected articles, and the controversies were solved by discussion and consensus.

Results

A total of 881 articles were identified, of which 99 met the selection criteria and were included in the study. The best-reported items (n = 99) were four: the two that described the introduction of a study, the results reflecting and concerning the study objectives, and the review by an ethics committee. Five items were poorly reported: to declare the incentives to study participants (n = 93), three items on the description of statistical analyses (n = 99, 99, and 94), and information on how nonrespondents differed from respondents (n = 92).

Conclusions

There is a moderate quality of reporting of all aspects that should be considered in survey-based studies in dentistry journals. Poorly reported criteria were found mainly in the statistical analysis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference LaVange LM, Koch GG, Schwartz TA. Applying simple survey methods to clinical trials data. Statist Med. 2001;20:2609–23.CrossRef LaVange LM, Koch GG, Schwartz TA. Applying simple survey methods to clinical trials data. Statist Med. 2001;20:2609–23.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Duran D, Monsalves MJ, Aubert J, Zarate V, Espinoza I. Systematic review of latin american national oral health surveys in adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46(4):328–35.CrossRefPubMed Duran D, Monsalves MJ, Aubert J, Zarate V, Espinoza I. Systematic review of latin american national oral health surveys in adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46(4):328–35.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J quality in Health Core. 2003;15(3):261–6.CrossRef Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J quality in Health Core. 2003;15(3):261–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bennett C, Khangura S, Brehaut JC, Graham ID, Moher D, Potter BK, et al. Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices. PLoS Med. 2011;8(8):e1001069.CrossRefPubMedCentral Bennett C, Khangura S, Brehaut JC, Graham ID, Moher D, Potter BK, et al. Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices. PLoS Med. 2011;8(8):e1001069.CrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Turk T, Elhady MT, Rashed S, Abdelkhalek M, Nasef SA, Khallaf et al. Quality of reporting web-based and non-web-based survey studies: What authors, reviewers and consumers should consider. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0194239. Turk T, Elhady MT, Rashed S, Abdelkhalek M, Nasef SA, Khallaf et al. Quality of reporting web-based and non-web-based survey studies: What authors, reviewers and consumers should consider. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0194239.
7.
go back to reference Li AH, Thomas SM, Farag A, Duffett M, Garg AX, Naylor KL. Quality of survey reporting in nephrology journals: a methodologic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(12):2089–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li AH, Thomas SM, Farag A, Duffett M, Garg AX, Naylor KL. Quality of survey reporting in nephrology journals: a methodologic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(12):2089–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Pagano MB, Dunbar NM, Tinmouth A, Apelseth TO, Lozano M, Cohn CS, et al. A methodological review of the quality of reporting of surveys in transfusion medicine. Transfusion. 2018;58(11):2720–27.CrossRefPubMed Pagano MB, Dunbar NM, Tinmouth A, Apelseth TO, Lozano M, Cohn CS, et al. A methodological review of the quality of reporting of surveys in transfusion medicine. Transfusion. 2018;58(11):2720–27.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rybakov KN, Beckett R, Dilley I, Sheehan AH. Reporting quality of survey research articles published in the pharmacy literature. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020;16(10):1354–8.CrossRefPubMed Rybakov KN, Beckett R, Dilley I, Sheehan AH. Reporting quality of survey research articles published in the pharmacy literature. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020;16(10):1354–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9.CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Grimshaw J. SURGE (the SUrvey Reporting GuidelinE). In: Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, et al. editors. Guidelines for reporting health research: a user`s manual. Oxford: Wiley; 2014. pp. 206–13. Grimshaw J. SURGE (the SUrvey Reporting GuidelinE). In: Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, et al. editors. Guidelines for reporting health research: a user`s manual. Oxford: Wiley; 2014. pp. 206–13.
12.
go back to reference Vähänikkilä H, Tjäderhane L, Nieminen P. The statistical reporting quality of articles published in 2010 in five dental journals. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73(1):76–80.CrossRefPubMed Vähänikkilä H, Tjäderhane L, Nieminen P. The statistical reporting quality of articles published in 2010 in five dental journals. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73(1):76–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Quality of survey-based study reports in dentistry
Authors
Manuel Antonio Mattos-Vela
Teresa Angélica Evaristo-Chiyong
Kariem Siquero-Vera
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02979-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue