Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2006

01-03-2006 | Otology

Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation

Authors: Luis Lassaletta, Alejandro Castro, Marta Bastarrica, Maria José de Sarriá, Javier Gavilán

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Most cochlear implant studies are focused on improvement of speech perception associated with implantation. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life changes in Spanish users. Thirty postlingually deaf patients fitted with a cochlear implant completed the Glasgow Benefit Inventory, a questionnaire dealing with communication abilities, and an open-ended questionnaire. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory revealed a positive effect in 93% of patients. The use of a cochlear implant significantly enhanced discrimination ability, telephone use and self-confidence. A high degree of satisfaction was achieved in all situations except with background noise. Ninety-six percent of patients would recommend the operation to a friend. A dramatic improvement in quality of life following cochlear implantation is revealed by a great majority of patients. The results cannot only be explained by enhancements to auditory perception.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bichey BG, Hoversland JM, Wynne MK, Miyamoto RT (2002) Changes in quality of life and the cost-utility associated with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Otol Neurotol 23:323–327 Bichey BG, Hoversland JM, Wynne MK, Miyamoto RT (2002) Changes in quality of life and the cost-utility associated with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Otol Neurotol 23:323–327
2.
go back to reference Cohen SM, Labadie RF, Dietrich MS, Haynes DS (2004) Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: The role of cochlear implants and hearing aids. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:413–422 Cohen SM, Labadie RF, Dietrich MS, Haynes DS (2004) Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: The role of cochlear implants and hearing aids. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:413–422
3.
go back to reference Faber CE, Grontved AM (2000) Cochlear implantation and change in quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol [Suppl] 543:151–153 Faber CE, Grontved AM (2000) Cochlear implantation and change in quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol [Suppl] 543:151–153
4.
go back to reference Francis HW, Chee N, Yeagle J, Cheng A, Niparko JK (2002) Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope 112:1482–1488 Francis HW, Chee N, Yeagle J, Cheng A, Niparko JK (2002) Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope 112:1482–1488
5.
go back to reference Hinderink JB, Krabbe PFM, Van den Broek P (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:756–765 Hinderink JB, Krabbe PFM, Van den Broek P (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:756–765
6.
go back to reference Kaplan DM, Shipp DB, Chen JM, Ng AH, Nedzelski JM (2003) Early-deafened adult cochlear implant users: assessment of outcomes. J Otolaryngol 32:245–249 Kaplan DM, Shipp DB, Chen JM, Ng AH, Nedzelski JM (2003) Early-deafened adult cochlear implant users: assessment of outcomes. J Otolaryngol 32:245–249
7.
go back to reference Karinen PJ, Sorri MJ, Välimmaa TT, Huttunen KH, Löppönen HJ (2001) Cochlear implant patients and quality of life. Scand Audiol 30 [Suppl] 52:48–50 Karinen PJ, Sorri MJ, Välimmaa TT, Huttunen KH, Löppönen HJ (2001) Cochlear implant patients and quality of life. Scand Audiol 30 [Suppl] 52:48–50
8.
go back to reference Kou BS, Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM (1994) Subjective benefits reported by adult Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant users. J Otolaryngol 23:8–14 Kou BS, Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM (1994) Subjective benefits reported by adult Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant users. J Otolaryngol 23:8–14
9.
go back to reference Krabbe PF, Hinderink JB, Van den Broek P (2000) The effect of cochlear implant use in postlingually deaf adults. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16:864–873 Krabbe PF, Hinderink JB, Van den Broek P (2000) The effect of cochlear implant use in postlingually deaf adults. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16:864–873
10.
go back to reference Maillet CJ, Tyler RS, Jordan HN (1995) Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 165:31–48 Maillet CJ, Tyler RS, Jordan HN (1995) Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 165:31–48
11.
go back to reference Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996 ) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105:415–422 Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996 ) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105:415–422
12.
go back to reference Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH (1993) The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108:329–333 Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH (1993) The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108:329–333
Metadata
Title
Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation
Authors
Luis Lassaletta
Alejandro Castro
Marta Bastarrica
Maria José de Sarriá
Javier Gavilán
Publication date
01-03-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-005-0987-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2006 Go to the issue