Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Head & Face Medicine 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Quality of life and problems associated with obturators of patients with maxillectomies

Authors: Marwa Mohammed Ali, Nadia Khalifa, Mohammed Nasser Alhajj

Published in: Head & Face Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Maxillary defects predispose patients to different undesirable effects. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life (QoL) of patients with maxillary defects (acquired/congenital) wearing obturators.

Methods

The study comprised 30 patients aged between 16 and 78 years. Interviews were conducted to collect information pertaining to patients; sociodemographic, self-reported function of obturator using Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS), self-evaluation of general health using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), radiotherapy treatment, salivary gland removal, reconstructive surgery, neck dissection and length of time obturators were worn. Clinical examination included type of maxillectomy, Aramany classification of the defect, and evaluation of obturator function using the Kapur retention and stability scoring system.

Result

Quality of life was affected significantly by marital status (P = 0.026). Married patients had better quality of life 61.3%, followed by divorced patients 38.8%, widowed 37.3% and the least QoL was detected in single patients 36.5%. Significant association between the type of maxillectomy and QoL was detected (P = 0.002). Retention of obturator prosthesis had a highly significant association with QoL (P < 0.001). Type of maxillectomy had a significant relation with obturator retention (P = 0.005). Stability had a significant correlation with QoL (P = 0.022). Obturator wearers who were treated with radiotherapy had lower QoL than those who were not treated with radiotherapy.

Conclusion

Rehabilitation of patients with maxillary defects using obturator prosthesis is an appropriate and not invasive treatment modality. Results support that good obturators contribute to a better life quality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Moreno MA, Skoracki RJ, Hanna EY, et al. Microvascular free flap reconstruction versus palatal obturation for maxillectomy defects. Head Neck. 2010;32:860–8.CrossRefPubMed Moreno MA, Skoracki RJ, Hanna EY, et al. Microvascular free flap reconstruction versus palatal obturation for maxillectomy defects. Head Neck. 2010;32:860–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Newton JT, Fiske J, Foote O, et al. Preliminary study of the impact of loss of part of the face and its prosthetic restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:585–90.CrossRefPubMed Newton JT, Fiske J, Foote O, et al. Preliminary study of the impact of loss of part of the face and its prosthetic restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:585–90.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lethaus B, Lie N, de Beer F, et al. Surgical and prosthetic reconsiderations in patients with maxillectomy. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:138–42.CrossRefPubMed Lethaus B, Lie N, de Beer F, et al. Surgical and prosthetic reconsiderations in patients with maxillectomy. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:138–42.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Metha S, Kohli D, Solanki K, et al. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of hemimaxillectomy patient with permanent silicon based obturator. JADCH. 2011;2:55–8. Metha S, Kohli D, Solanki K, et al. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of hemimaxillectomy patient with permanent silicon based obturator. JADCH. 2011;2:55–8.
6.
go back to reference de Carvalho-Teles V, Pegoraro-Krook MI, Lauris JR. Speech evaluation with and without palatal obturator in patients submitted to maxillectomy. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14:421–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Carvalho-Teles V, Pegoraro-Krook MI, Lauris JR. Speech evaluation with and without palatal obturator in patients submitted to maxillectomy. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14:421–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, et al. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:352–63.CrossRefPubMed Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, et al. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:352–63.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Garhnayak M, Garhnayak L, Kumar Kar A, et al. Prosthetic rehabilitation of a unilateral maxillary defect with an intermediate Obturator. IJDA. 2002;2:378–82. Garhnayak M, Garhnayak L, Kumar Kar A, et al. Prosthetic rehabilitation of a unilateral maxillary defect with an intermediate Obturator. IJDA. 2002;2:378–82.
9.
go back to reference Riaz N, Warriach RA. Quality of life in patients with obturator prostheses. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22:121–5.PubMed Riaz N, Warriach RA. Quality of life in patients with obturator prostheses. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22:121–5.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Singh M, Bhushan A, Kumar N, et al. Obturator prosthesis for hemimaxillectomy patients. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013;4:117–20. Singh M, Bhushan A, Kumar N, et al. Obturator prosthesis for hemimaxillectomy patients. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013;4:117–20.
11.
go back to reference The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. Ninth edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:e1–e105.CrossRef The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. Ninth edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:e1–e105.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Depprich R, Naujoks C, Lind D, et al. Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after prosthodontic therapy with obturator prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:71–9.CrossRefPubMed Depprich R, Naujoks C, Lind D, et al. Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after prosthodontic therapy with obturator prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:71–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Irish J, Sandhu N, Simpson C, et al. Quality of life in patients with maxillectomy prostheses. Head Neck. 2009;31:813–21.CrossRefPubMed Irish J, Sandhu N, Simpson C, et al. Quality of life in patients with maxillectomy prostheses. Head Neck. 2009;31:813–21.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, et al. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck. 1996;18:323–34.CrossRefPubMed Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, et al. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck. 1996;18:323–34.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ono T, Kohda H, Hori K, et al. Masticatory performance in postmaxillectomy patients with edentulous maxillae fitted with obturator prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:145–50.PubMed Ono T, Kohda H, Hori K, et al. Masticatory performance in postmaxillectomy patients with edentulous maxillae fitted with obturator prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:145–50.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Jacob RF, Weber RS, King GE. Whole salivary flow rates following submandibular gland resection. Head Neck. 1996;18:242–7.CrossRefPubMed Jacob RF, Weber RS, King GE. Whole salivary flow rates following submandibular gland resection. Head Neck. 1996;18:242–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Khalifa N, Allen PH, Abu-bakr NH, et al. Psychometric properties and performance of the oral helth impact profile (OHIP-14-ar) among Sudanese adults. J Oral Sci. 2013;55:1–10.CrossRef Khalifa N, Allen PH, Abu-bakr NH, et al. Psychometric properties and performance of the oral helth impact profile (OHIP-14-ar) among Sudanese adults. J Oral Sci. 2013;55:1–10.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18:1007–19.CrossRefPubMed McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18:1007–19.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, et al. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316:736–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, et al. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316:736–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Paul-Dauphin A, Guillemin F, Virion JM, et al. Bias and precision in visual analogue scales: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:1117–27.CrossRefPubMed Paul-Dauphin A, Guillemin F, Virion JM, et al. Bias and precision in visual analogue scales: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:1117–27.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK Jr, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: part I--retention, stability, and tissue response. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:354–63.CrossRefPubMed Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK Jr, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: part I--retention, stability, and tissue response. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:354–63.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gehan FM. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of soft acrylic denture compared to conventional one when restoring severely resorbed edentulous ridge. CDJ. 2008;24:313–33. Gehan FM. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of soft acrylic denture compared to conventional one when restoring severely resorbed edentulous ridge. CDJ. 2008;24:313–33.
23.
go back to reference Hertrampf K, Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM, et al. Quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after treatment for malignancy. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:657–65.PubMed Hertrampf K, Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM, et al. Quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after treatment for malignancy. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:657–65.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Fang FM, Tsai WL, Chien CY, et al. Health-related quality of life outcome for oral cancer survivors after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:641–6.CrossRefPubMed Fang FM, Tsai WL, Chien CY, et al. Health-related quality of life outcome for oral cancer survivors after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:641–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Terrell JE, Fisher SG, Wolf GT. Long-term quality of life after treatment of laryngeal cancer. The veterans affairs laryngeal cancer study group. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:964–71.CrossRefPubMed Terrell JE, Fisher SG, Wolf GT. Long-term quality of life after treatment of laryngeal cancer. The veterans affairs laryngeal cancer study group. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:964–71.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Wan Leung S, Lee TF, Chien CY, et al. Health-related quality of life in 640 head and neck cancer survivors after radiotherapy using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wan Leung S, Lee TF, Chien CY, et al. Health-related quality of life in 640 head and neck cancer survivors after radiotherapy using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Rogers SN, Lowe D, McNally D, et al. Health-related quality of life after maxillectomy: a comparison between prosthetic obturation and free flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:174–81.CrossRefPubMed Rogers SN, Lowe D, McNally D, et al. Health-related quality of life after maxillectomy: a comparison between prosthetic obturation and free flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:174–81.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Matsuyama M, Tsukiyama Y, Tomioka M, et al. Clinical assessment of chewing function of obturator prosthesis wearers by objective measurement of masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:253–7.PubMed Matsuyama M, Tsukiyama Y, Tomioka M, et al. Clinical assessment of chewing function of obturator prosthesis wearers by objective measurement of masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:253–7.PubMed
29.
30.
go back to reference Arigbede AO, Dosumu OO, Shaba OP, et al. Evaluation of speech in patients with partial surgically acquired defects: pre and post prosthetic obturation. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7:89–96.PubMed Arigbede AO, Dosumu OO, Shaba OP, et al. Evaluation of speech in patients with partial surgically acquired defects: pre and post prosthetic obturation. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7:89–96.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Rieger JM, Wolfaardt JF, Jha N, et al. Maxillary obturators: the relationship between patient satisfaction and speech outcome. Head Neck. 2003;25:895–903.CrossRefPubMed Rieger JM, Wolfaardt JF, Jha N, et al. Maxillary obturators: the relationship between patient satisfaction and speech outcome. Head Neck. 2003;25:895–903.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference D'Antonio LL, Zimmerman GJ, Cella DF, et al. Quality of life and functional status measures in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:482–7.CrossRefPubMed D'Antonio LL, Zimmerman GJ, Cella DF, et al. Quality of life and functional status measures in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:482–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Koyama S, Sasaki K, Inai T, et al. Effects of defect configuration, size, and remaining teeth on masticatory function in post-maxillectomy patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:635–41.CrossRefPubMed Koyama S, Sasaki K, Inai T, et al. Effects of defect configuration, size, and remaining teeth on masticatory function in post-maxillectomy patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:635–41.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: classification. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40:554–7.CrossRefPubMed Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: classification. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40:554–7.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Umino S, Masuda G, Ono S, et al. Speech intelligibility following maxillectomy with and without a prosthesis: an analysis of 54 cases. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:153–8.CrossRefPubMed Umino S, Masuda G, Ono S, et al. Speech intelligibility following maxillectomy with and without a prosthesis: an analysis of 54 cases. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:153–8.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Wells MD, Luce EA. Reconstruction of midfacial defects after surgical resection of malignancies. Clin Plast Surg. 1995;22:79–89.PubMed Wells MD, Luce EA. Reconstruction of midfacial defects after surgical resection of malignancies. Clin Plast Surg. 1995;22:79–89.PubMed
38.
39.
go back to reference Bidra AS, Jacob RF, Taylor TD. Classification of maxillectomy defects: a systematic review and criteria necessary for a universal description. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:261–70.CrossRefPubMed Bidra AS, Jacob RF, Taylor TD. Classification of maxillectomy defects: a systematic review and criteria necessary for a universal description. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:261–70.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Alhajj MN, Ismail IA, Khalifa N. Maxillary obturator prosthesis for a hemimaxillectomy patient: a clinical case report. Saudi. J Dent Res. 2016;7:153–9. Alhajj MN, Ismail IA, Khalifa N. Maxillary obturator prosthesis for a hemimaxillectomy patient: a clinical case report. Saudi. J Dent Res. 2016;7:153–9.
41.
go back to reference Ali A, Fardy MJ, Patton DW. Maxillectomy--to reconstruct or obturate? Results of a UK survey of oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;33:207–10.CrossRefPubMed Ali A, Fardy MJ, Patton DW. Maxillectomy--to reconstruct or obturate? Results of a UK survey of oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;33:207–10.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Quality of life and problems associated with obturators of patients with maxillectomies
Authors
Marwa Mohammed Ali
Nadia Khalifa
Mohammed Nasser Alhajj
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Head & Face Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1746-160X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-017-0160-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Head & Face Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue