Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Oncology Reports 2/2010

01-03-2010

Quality Initiatives in Head and Neck Cancer

Author: Amy Y. Chen

Published in: Current Oncology Reports | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

A growing national health care initiative is gathering momentum to improve the quality of care for all Americans. Efforts to establish, monitor, and reward quality care have therefore been extensive. The Institute of Medicine has established that a large proportion of individuals do not receive recommended cancer care for their stage of disease, and that quality of care metrics should be established to decrease inappropriate care (overuse, under use, or wrong use). The American Head and Neck Society has been instrumental in developing quality measures for two of the most common head and neck cancers and in promoting adherence to these measures to improve quality of care for all patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
2.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine: Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance, Vol. 1. Edited by Lohr KN. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990. Institute of Medicine: Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance, Vol. 1. Edited by Lohr KN. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
3.
go back to reference Donabedian A: The Definition of Quality and Approaches in Assessment, Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980. Donabedian A: The Definition of Quality and Approaches in Assessment, Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.
5.
go back to reference Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak TF, et al.: Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (# 9501). Head Neck 2005, 27:843–850.CrossRefPubMed Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak TF, et al.: Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (# 9501). Head Neck 2005, 27:843–850.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Karnofsky D, Burchenal J: The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In MacLeod C, ed. Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agendas. New York: Columbia University Press, 1949:191–205. Karnofsky D, Burchenal J: The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In MacLeod C, ed. Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agendas. New York: Columbia University Press, 1949:191–205.
7.
go back to reference Bartlett EE, Grayson M, Barker R, et al.: The effects of physician communications skills on patient satisfaction; recall, and adherence. J Chronic Dis 1984, 37:755–764.CrossRefPubMed Bartlett EE, Grayson M, Barker R, et al.: The effects of physician communications skills on patient satisfaction; recall, and adherence. J Chronic Dis 1984, 37:755–764.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hsieh MO, Kagle JD: Understanding patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction with health care. Health Soc Work 1991, 16:281–290.PubMed Hsieh MO, Kagle JD: Understanding patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction with health care. Health Soc Work 1991, 16:281–290.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Inui TS: Dropouts and broken appointments. A literature review and agenda for future research. Med Care 1980, 18:1146–1157.CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Inui TS: Dropouts and broken appointments. A literature review and agenda for future research. Med Care 1980, 18:1146–1157.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cleary PD, McNeil BJ: Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 1988, 25:25–36.PubMed Cleary PD, McNeil BJ: Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 1988, 25:25–36.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Davies AR, Ware JE Jr: Involving consumers in quality of care assessment. Health Aff (Millwood) 1988, 7:33–48.CrossRef Davies AR, Ware JE Jr: Involving consumers in quality of care assessment. Health Aff (Millwood) 1988, 7:33–48.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hayward RA, Bernard AM, Rosevear JS, et al.: An evaluation of generic screens for poor quality of hospital care on a general medicine service. Med Care 1993, 31:394–402.CrossRefPubMed Hayward RA, Bernard AM, Rosevear JS, et al.: An evaluation of generic screens for poor quality of hospital care on a general medicine service. Med Care 1993, 31:394–402.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Malin JL, Schneider EC, Epstein AM, et al.: Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:626–634.CrossRefPubMed Malin JL, Schneider EC, Epstein AM, et al.: Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:626–634.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference •• Blayney DW, McNiff K, Hanauer D, et al.: Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27:3802–3807. This article provides a comprehensive evaluation of a practice measure at work.CrossRefPubMed •• Blayney DW, McNiff K, Hanauer D, et al.: Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27:3802–3807. This article provides a comprehensive evaluation of a practice measure at work.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Weber RS. Improving the quality of head and neck cancer care. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007, 133:1188–1192.CrossRefPubMed Weber RS. Improving the quality of head and neck cancer care. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007, 133:1188–1192.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Chen AY, Schrag N, Hao Y, et al.: Changes in treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer 1985–2001. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006, 135:831–837.CrossRefPubMed Chen AY, Schrag N, Hao Y, et al.: Changes in treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer 1985–2001. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006, 135:831–837.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Chen AY, Schrag N, Hao Y, et al.: Changes in treatment of advanced oropharyngeal cancer, 1985–2001. Laryngoscope 2007, 117:16–21.CrossRefPubMed Chen AY, Schrag N, Hao Y, et al.: Changes in treatment of advanced oropharyngeal cancer, 1985–2001. Laryngoscope 2007, 117:16–21.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chen AY, Pavluck A, Halpern M, Ward E: Impact of treating facilities’ volume on survival for early-stage laryngeal cancer. Head Neck 2009, 31:1137–1143.CrossRefPubMed Chen AY, Pavluck A, Halpern M, Ward E: Impact of treating facilities’ volume on survival for early-stage laryngeal cancer. Head Neck 2009, 31:1137–1143.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Chen AY, Halpern M: Factors predictive of survival in advanced laryngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007, 133:1270–1276.CrossRefPubMed Chen AY, Halpern M: Factors predictive of survival in advanced laryngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007, 133:1270–1276.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Roland PS, Smith TL, Schwartz SR, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: cerumen impaction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008, 139:S1–S21.CrossRefPubMed Roland PS, Smith TL, Schwartz SR, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: cerumen impaction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008, 139:S1–S21.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rosenfeld RM, Brown L, Cannon CR, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: acute otitis externa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006, 134:S4–S23.CrossRefPubMed Rosenfeld RM, Brown L, Cannon CR, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: acute otitis externa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006, 134:S4–S23.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Schwartz SR, Cohen SM, Dailey SH, et al.: Clinical practice guidelines: Hoarseness (Dysphonia). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009, 141:S1–S31.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz SR, Cohen SM, Dailey SH, et al.: Clinical practice guidelines: Hoarseness (Dysphonia). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009, 141:S1–S31.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bhattacharyya N, Baugh RF, Orvidas L, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008, 139:S47–S81.CrossRefPubMed Bhattacharyya N, Baugh RF, Orvidas L, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008, 139:S47–S81.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rosenfeld RM, Culpepper L, Doyle KJ, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: otitis media with effusion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004, 130:S95–S118.CrossRefPubMed Rosenfeld RM, Culpepper L, Doyle KJ, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: otitis media with effusion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004, 130:S95–S118.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Rosenfeld RM, Andes D, Bhattacharyya N, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007, 137:S1–S31.CrossRefPubMed Rosenfeld RM, Andes D, Bhattacharyya N, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007, 137:S1–S31.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference •• National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Head and Neck Cancers. Guidelines for Treatment of Cancer by Site. Available at http://nccn/.org. Accessed on December 13, 2009. This resource provides the most up-to-date information on the current management of head and neck cancer. •• National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Head and Neck Cancers. Guidelines for Treatment of Cancer by Site. Available at http://​nccn/​.​org. Accessed on December 13, 2009. This resource provides the most up-to-date information on the current management of head and neck cancer.
29.
go back to reference Clark CH, Miles EA, Urbano MT, et al.: Pre-trial quality assurance processes for an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) trial: PARSPORT, a UK multicentre phase III trial comparing conventional radiotherapy and parotid-sparing IMRT for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Br J Radiol 2009, 82:585–594.CrossRefPubMed Clark CH, Miles EA, Urbano MT, et al.: Pre-trial quality assurance processes for an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) trial: PARSPORT, a UK multicentre phase III trial comparing conventional radiotherapy and parotid-sparing IMRT for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Br J Radiol 2009, 82:585–594.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Rosenthal DI, Asper JA, Barker JL Jr, et al.: Importance of patient examination to clinical quality assurance in head and neck radiation oncology. Head Neck 2006, 28:967–973.CrossRefPubMed Rosenthal DI, Asper JA, Barker JL Jr, et al.: Importance of patient examination to clinical quality assurance in head and neck radiation oncology. Head Neck 2006, 28:967–973.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference •• Chen AY: The development of quality care measures for oral cavity cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008, 134:672. This article provided the first introduction to quality measures in the head and neck.CrossRef •• Chen AY: The development of quality care measures for oral cavity cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008, 134:672. This article provided the first introduction to quality measures in the head and neck.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hewitt M, Simone J: Enhancing Data Systems to Improved Quality of Cancer Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000. Hewitt M, Simone J: Enhancing Data Systems to Improved Quality of Cancer Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
Metadata
Title
Quality Initiatives in Head and Neck Cancer
Author
Amy Y. Chen
Publication date
01-03-2010
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Oncology Reports / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1523-3790
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-010-0083-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Current Oncology Reports 2/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine