Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 1/2021

01-02-2021 | Review Article

Qualitative Research in Surgical Disciplines: Need and Scope

Authors: Jitendra Kumar Meena, Ashish Jakhetiya, Arun Pandey

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

There is a deficient application of qualitative research methods in surgical specialties. The concerned researchers largely focus on quantitative estimates like: health risk, burden, surgical management and objective outcomes. Without qualitative assessment important aspects like: patient’s preparation, perception, satisfaction, coping ability, well-being and functional outcomes are not addressed. In quantitative research, evaluation of pre-set variables is done to primarily study the process and outcomes of healthcare interventions. However, in qualitative research, patient’s experience, emotions, self-image, decision-making, pain perception, coping mechanism and quality of life (QoL) can be assessed. With time, surgeons are emphasizing more on the importance of functional recovery and QoL after surgery in multidisciplinary board discussions, and before making treatment decisions. Qualitative research employs purposive sampling and a meticulous data collection using in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) etc. Collected data is analysed using statistical tools post transcription and coding and is suitably presented. Like other research designs, qualitative methods also have uniform criteria’s and standards for quality management. Adoption of qualitative research is critical in filling gaps of patient and surgeon’s perspective and experience of process of surgical care for clinical policy decisions. Integration of qualitative evidence in shared decision-making process will further improve standards and practice of surgical care and enhance doctor-patient relationship.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Frampton SB, Guastello S, Hoy L, Naylor M, Sheridan S, Johnston-Fleece M (2017). Harnessing evidence and experience to change culture: a guiding framework for patient and family engaged care National Academy Of Medicine 1-38 Frampton SB, Guastello S, Hoy L, Naylor M, Sheridan S, Johnston-Fleece M (2017). Harnessing evidence and experience to change culture: a guiding framework for patient and family engaged care National Academy Of Medicine 1-38
2.
go back to reference Hsing CY, Wong YK, Wang CP, Wang CC, Jiang RS, Chen FJ, Liu SA (2011) Comparison between free flap and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients–a quality of life analysis. Oral Oncol 47(6):522–527CrossRef Hsing CY, Wong YK, Wang CP, Wang CC, Jiang RS, Chen FJ, Liu SA (2011) Comparison between free flap and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients–a quality of life analysis. Oral Oncol 47(6):522–527CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Viana TSA, de Barros Silva PG, Pereira KMA, Mota MRL, Alves APNN, de Souza EF, Sousa FB (2017) Prospective evaluation of quality of life in patients undergoing primary surgery for oral cancer: preoperative and postoperative analysis. Asian Pacific Journal Of Cancer Prevention: APJCP 18(8):2093–2100PubMed Viana TSA, de Barros Silva PG, Pereira KMA, Mota MRL, Alves APNN, de Souza EF, Sousa FB (2017) Prospective evaluation of quality of life in patients undergoing primary surgery for oral cancer: preoperative and postoperative analysis. Asian Pacific Journal Of Cancer Prevention: APJCP 18(8):2093–2100PubMed
4.
go back to reference Shauver MS, Chung KC (2010) A guide to qualitative research in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(3):1089–1097CrossRef Shauver MS, Chung KC (2010) A guide to qualitative research in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(3):1089–1097CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Costa P, Cardoso JM, Louro H, Dias J, Costa L, Rodrigues R, Espiridião P, Maciel J, Ferraz L (2018) Impact on sexual function of surgical treatment in rectal cancer. International Braz J Urol 44(1):141–149CrossRef Costa P, Cardoso JM, Louro H, Dias J, Costa L, Rodrigues R, Espiridião P, Maciel J, Ferraz L (2018) Impact on sexual function of surgical treatment in rectal cancer. International Braz J Urol 44(1):141–149CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sibeoni J, Picard C, Orri M, Labey M, Bousquet G, Verneuil L, Revah-Levy A (2018) Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer 18(1):951CrossRef Sibeoni J, Picard C, Orri M, Labey M, Bousquet G, Verneuil L, Revah-Levy A (2018) Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer 18(1):951CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Vogel RI, Strayer LG, Ahmed RL, Blaes A, Lazovich D (2017) A qualitative study of quality of life concerns following a melanoma diagnosis. Journal of Skin Cancer 2017:2041872CrossRef Vogel RI, Strayer LG, Ahmed RL, Blaes A, Lazovich D (2017) A qualitative study of quality of life concerns following a melanoma diagnosis. Journal of Skin Cancer 2017:2041872CrossRef
8.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Human Services (2018). Qualitative methods in implementation science. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Cancer Institute, 1–31 US Department of Health and Human Services (2018). Qualitative methods in implementation science. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Cancer Institute, 1–31
9.
go back to reference Sandelowski M, Leeman J (2012) Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res 22(10):1404–1413CrossRef Sandelowski M, Leeman J (2012) Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res 22(10):1404–1413CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tracy SJ (2010) Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq 16(10):837–851CrossRef Tracy SJ (2010) Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq 16(10):837–851CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hannes, K. (2011). Chapter 4: critical appraisal of qualitative research. Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions. Version, 1, 1–14 Hannes, K. (2011). Chapter 4: critical appraisal of qualitative research. Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions. Version, 1, 1–14
12.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Clark JP (2009) Qualitative research: a review of methods with use of examples from the total knee replacement literature. JBJS 91(Supplement_3):107–112CrossRef Beaton DE, Clark JP (2009) Qualitative research: a review of methods with use of examples from the total knee replacement literature. JBJS 91(Supplement_3):107–112CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wright JG, McKeever P (2000) Qualitative research: its role in clinical research. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 33:275–280 Wright JG, McKeever P (2000) Qualitative research: its role in clinical research. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 33:275–280
15.
go back to reference Polit DF, Beck CT (2009) Essentials of nursing research 7th edition: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 489–513 Polit DF, Beck CT (2009) Essentials of nursing research 7th edition: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 489–513
16.
go back to reference Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research:105–117 Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research:105–117
17.
go back to reference Connelly LM (2016) Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nurs 25(6):435–437PubMed Connelly LM (2016) Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nurs 25(6):435–437PubMed
18.
go back to reference Tong A, Morton RL, Webster AC (2016) How qualitative research informs clinical and policy decision making in transplantation: a review. Transplantation 100(9):1997–2005CrossRef Tong A, Morton RL, Webster AC (2016) How qualitative research informs clinical and policy decision making in transplantation: a review. Transplantation 100(9):1997–2005CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Konecny, L. M. (2010). Quality of life, social support, and uncertainty among Latina and Caucasian breast cancer survivors: a comparative study. In Oncology Nursing Forum (Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 93). Oncology Nursing Society Konecny, L. M. (2010). Quality of life, social support, and uncertainty among Latina and Caucasian breast cancer survivors: a comparative study. In Oncology Nursing Forum (Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 93). Oncology Nursing Society
Metadata
Title
Qualitative Research in Surgical Disciplines: Need and Scope
Authors
Jitendra Kumar Meena
Ashish Jakhetiya
Arun Pandey
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02280-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Indian Journal of Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue