Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 4/2016

01-04-2016 | Original Communication

QualiCOP: real-world effectiveness, tolerability, and quality of life in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with glatiramer acetate, treatment-naïve patients, and previously treated patients

Authors: Tjalf Ziemssen, Pasquale Calabrese, Iris-Katharina Penner, Rainer Apfel

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Treatment of symptoms and signs beyond the expanded disability status scale remains a major target in multiple sclerosis. QualiCOP was an observational, non-interventional, open-label study conducted at 170 sites in Germany. Of the 754 enrolled patients, 96 % had relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and were either disease-modifying therapy naïve (de novo, n = 481) or previously treated (n = 237) with once-daily, subcutaneous 20-mg/mL glatiramer acetate (GA). Assessments of relapse rate, disease progression, overall functioning, quality of life (QoL), cognition, fatigue, and depression were performed over 24 months. GA treatment over 24 months was associated with reduced annual relapse rate for previously treated (from 0.98 to 0.54 relapses) and de novo (from 0.81 to 0.48 relapses) patients. Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite scores showed slight improvement in both cohorts (all p < 0.01). Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Multiple Sclerosis Inventory Cognition scale scores showed robust improvement in cognition among previously treated and de novo cohorts (all p < 0.001). General Depression Scale scores showed significantly reduced depressive symptoms (p < 0.001). Disease severity, fatigue, and QoL were stable over the observational period. These real-world findings suggest that patients with MS show benefit from GA treatment in important QoL parameters beyond standard measures of relapse and disease severity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnson KP (2010) Risks vs benefits of glatiramer acetate: a changing perspective as new therapies emerge for multiple sclerosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 6:153–172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Johnson KP (2010) Risks vs benefits of glatiramer acetate: a changing perspective as new therapies emerge for multiple sclerosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 6:153–172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Zwibel H, Smrtka J (2011) Improving quality of life in multiple sclerosis: an unmet need. Am J Manag Care 17:S139–S145PubMed Zwibel H, Smrtka J (2011) Improving quality of life in multiple sclerosis: an unmet need. Am J Manag Care 17:S139–S145PubMed
3.
go back to reference Krause I, Kern S, Horntrich A, Ziemssen T (2013) Employment status in multiple. Mult Scler 19(13):1792–1799CrossRefPubMed Krause I, Kern S, Horntrich A, Ziemssen T (2013) Employment status in multiple. Mult Scler 19(13):1792–1799CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ziemssen T (2009) Multiple sclerosis beyond EDSS: depression and fatigue. J Neurol Sci 227(suppl 1):S37–S41CrossRef Ziemssen T (2009) Multiple sclerosis beyond EDSS: depression and fatigue. J Neurol Sci 227(suppl 1):S37–S41CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Freal JE, Kraft GH, Coryell JK (1984) Symptomatic fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 65(3):135–138PubMed Freal JE, Kraft GH, Coryell JK (1984) Symptomatic fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 65(3):135–138PubMed
6.
go back to reference Williams AE, Vietri JT, Isherwood G, Flor A (2014) Symptoms and association with health outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a US patient survey. Mult Scler Int 2014:203183PubMedPubMedCentral Williams AE, Vietri JT, Isherwood G, Flor A (2014) Symptoms and association with health outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a US patient survey. Mult Scler Int 2014:203183PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Feinstein A (2002) An examination of suicidal intent in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 59(5):674–678CrossRefPubMed Feinstein A (2002) An examination of suicidal intent in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 59(5):674–678CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mohr DC, Goodkin DE, Likosky W et al (1996) Therapeutic expectations of patients with multiple sclerosis upon initiating interferon beta-1b: relationship to adherence to treatment. Mult Scler 2(5):222–226PubMed Mohr DC, Goodkin DE, Likosky W et al (1996) Therapeutic expectations of patients with multiple sclerosis upon initiating interferon beta-1b: relationship to adherence to treatment. Mult Scler 2(5):222–226PubMed
9.
go back to reference Syed M, Rog D, Parkes L, Shepherd GL (2014) Patient expectations and experiences of multiple sclerosis interferon β-1a treatment: a longitudinal, observational study in routine UK clinical practice. Patient Prefer Adherence 8:247–255CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Syed M, Rog D, Parkes L, Shepherd GL (2014) Patient expectations and experiences of multiple sclerosis interferon β-1a treatment: a longitudinal, observational study in routine UK clinical practice. Patient Prefer Adherence 8:247–255CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Kern S, Reichmann H, Ziemssen T (2008) Adherence to neurologic treatment. Lessons from multiple sclerosis. Nervenarzt 79(8):877–890CrossRefPubMed Kern S, Reichmann H, Ziemssen T (2008) Adherence to neurologic treatment. Lessons from multiple sclerosis. Nervenarzt 79(8):877–890CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tan H, Cai Q, Agarwal S et al (2011) Impact of adherence to disease-modifying therapies on clinical and economic outcomes among patients with multiple sclerosis. Adv Ther 28(1):51–61CrossRefPubMed Tan H, Cai Q, Agarwal S et al (2011) Impact of adherence to disease-modifying therapies on clinical and economic outcomes among patients with multiple sclerosis. Adv Ther 28(1):51–61CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Cohen JA et al (1995) Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. The Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology 45(7):1268–1276CrossRefPubMed Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Cohen JA et al (1995) Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. The Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology 45(7):1268–1276CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ziemssen T, Neuhaus O, Hohlfeld R (2011) Risk-benefit assessment of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Drug Saf 24(13):979–990CrossRef Ziemssen T, Neuhaus O, Hohlfeld R (2011) Risk-benefit assessment of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Drug Saf 24(13):979–990CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ford C, Ladkani D (2013) Twenty years of continuous treatment of multiple sclerosis with glatiramer acetate 20 mg daily: long-term clinical results of the US open-label extension study. Presented at the 29th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). October 3, 2013; Copenhagen, Denmark Ford C, Ladkani D (2013) Twenty years of continuous treatment of multiple sclerosis with glatiramer acetate 20 mg daily: long-term clinical results of the US open-label extension study. Presented at the 29th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). October 3, 2013; Copenhagen, Denmark
15.
go back to reference Penner IK, Raselli C, Stöcklin M et al (2009) The Fatigue Scale for motor and cognitive functions (FSMC): validation of a new instrument to assess multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. Mult Scler 15(12):1509–1517CrossRefPubMed Penner IK, Raselli C, Stöcklin M et al (2009) The Fatigue Scale for motor and cognitive functions (FSMC): validation of a new instrument to assess multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. Mult Scler 15(12):1509–1517CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Calabrese P, Kessler J, Kalbe E (2004) Das Multiple Sklerose Inventar Cognition (MUSIC). Psychoneuro 30(7):384–388CrossRef Calabrese P, Kessler J, Kalbe E (2004) Das Multiple Sklerose Inventar Cognition (MUSIC). Psychoneuro 30(7):384–388CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33(11):1444–1452CrossRefPubMed Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33(11):1444–1452CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ziemssen T, Calabrese P, Penne IK, Apfel R; QualiCOP Study Group (2014) QualiCOP: an open-label, prospective, observational study of glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Presented at the Joint Congress of European Neurology, May 31–June 3, 2014; Istanbul, Turkey Ziemssen T, Calabrese P, Penne IK, Apfel R; QualiCOP Study Group (2014) QualiCOP: an open-label, prospective, observational study of glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Presented at the Joint Congress of European Neurology, May 31–June 3, 2014; Istanbul, Turkey
19.
go back to reference Hautzinger M, Bailer M (1993) Allgemeine Depressions Skala. Manual. Beltz Test GmbH, Göttingen Hautzinger M, Bailer M (1993) Allgemeine Depressions Skala. Manual. Beltz Test GmbH, Göttingen
20.
go back to reference Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G et al (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 58(6):840–846CrossRefPubMed Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G et al (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 58(6):840–846CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ziemssen T, Hoffman J, Apfel R, Kern s (2008) Effects of glatiramer acetate on fatigue and days of absence from work in first-time treated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ziemssen T, Hoffman J, Apfel R, Kern s (2008) Effects of glatiramer acetate on fatigue and days of absence from work in first-time treated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Ziemssen T, Bajenaru O, Carrá A et al (2014) A 2-year observational study of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis switching to glatiramer acetate from other disease-modifying therapies: the COPTIMIZE trial. J Neurol 261(11):2101–2111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ziemssen T, Bajenaru O, Carrá A et al (2014) A 2-year observational study of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis switching to glatiramer acetate from other disease-modifying therapies: the COPTIMIZE trial. J Neurol 261(11):2101–2111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Río J, Porcel J, Téllez N et al (2005) Factors related with treatment adherence to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate therapy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 11(3):306–309CrossRefPubMed Río J, Porcel J, Téllez N et al (2005) Factors related with treatment adherence to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate therapy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 11(3):306–309CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Jongen PJ, Lehnick D, Sanders E et al (2010) Health-related quality of life in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients during treatment with glatiramer acetate: a prospective, observational, international, multi-centre study. FOCUS Study Group. Health Qual Life Outcomes 8:133CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jongen PJ, Lehnick D, Sanders E et al (2010) Health-related quality of life in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients during treatment with glatiramer acetate: a prospective, observational, international, multi-centre study. FOCUS Study Group. Health Qual Life Outcomes 8:133CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
QualiCOP: real-world effectiveness, tolerability, and quality of life in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with glatiramer acetate, treatment-naïve patients, and previously treated patients
Authors
Tjalf Ziemssen
Pasquale Calabrese
Iris-Katharina Penner
Rainer Apfel
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8058-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Neurology 4/2016 Go to the issue