Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2013

01-04-2013 | Original Article

Publishing in surgery: how and why?

Authors: Christophe Mariette, Guillaume Piessen, William B. Robb

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Evidence-based medicine continues to have an increasingly important impact on all surgical departments, with the art of publication becoming a skill in its own right and occupying an ever more central role. However, it remains a challenge for any surgeon to publish their work.

Purpose

The aims of this educational review are to understand why, what and where surgeons should publish and to provide surgeons with a guide regarding the publication process and the rules to be adhered to.

Methodology

This review targets (1) any surgeon beginning their scientific publication activity, (2) more experienced surgeons who wish to optimise their ability to have their work published and finally (3) leaders of research departments who aspire to improve the quality of their publications and their research productivity and profile.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nissen R (1961) Gastropexy and “fundoplication” in surgical treatment of hiatal hernia. Am J Dig Dis 6:954–61PubMedCrossRef Nissen R (1961) Gastropexy and “fundoplication” in surgical treatment of hiatal hernia. Am J Dig Dis 6:954–61PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Perissat J, Collet D, Belliard R (1990) Gallstones: laparoscopic treatment—cholecystectomy, cholecystectomy, and lithotripsy. Our own technique. Surg Endosc 4:1–5PubMedCrossRef Perissat J, Collet D, Belliard R (1990) Gallstones: laparoscopic treatment—cholecystectomy, cholecystectomy, and lithotripsy. Our own technique. Surg Endosc 4:1–5PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tompson A (2006) How to write an English medical manuscript that will be published and have impact. Surg Today 36:407–9PubMedCrossRef Tompson A (2006) How to write an English medical manuscript that will be published and have impact. Surg Today 36:407–9PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Devos P, Dufresne E, Renard JM, Beuscart R (2003) SIGAPS: a prototype of bibliographic tool for medical research evaluation. Stud Health Technol Inform 95:721–6PubMed Devos P, Dufresne E, Renard JM, Beuscart R (2003) SIGAPS: a prototype of bibliographic tool for medical research evaluation. Stud Health Technol Inform 95:721–6PubMed
8.
go back to reference Garfield E (1987) What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 1: the spectrum of deviant behavior in science. Curr Contents Clin Med 15:3–7 Garfield E (1987) What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 1: the spectrum of deviant behavior in science. Curr Contents Clin Med 15:3–7
9.
go back to reference ICJME (2009). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: publishing and editorial issues related to publication in biomedical journals: authorship and contributorship. http://www.icmje.org/. Accessed August 30, 2011 ICJME (2009). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: publishing and editorial issues related to publication in biomedical journals: authorship and contributorship. http://​www.​icmje.​org/​. Accessed August 30, 2011
Metadata
Title
Publishing in surgery: how and why?
Authors
Christophe Mariette
Guillaume Piessen
William B. Robb
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0991-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2013 Go to the issue