Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Publication trends in corneal transplantation: a bibliometric analysis

Authors: Evre Pekel, Gökhan Pekel

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Our aim was to demonstrate the publication trends of corneal transplantation in the last decade.

Methods

All of the keratoplasty research articles, letters, case reports, reviews and meeting abstracts published between January 2006 and December 2015 indexed on the Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge were evaluated. A bibliometric filter was used to capture keratoplasty related publications by using the key words ‘keratoplasty’, ‘corneal transplantation’ or ‘keratoprosthesis’ in the ‘title’ selection mode.

Results

A total of 2726 publications were evaluated in the present study. Documents related to penetrating keratoplasty only have been decreased, whereas the documents related to endothelial keratoplasty were increased in the last decade. The total keratoplasty publication counts had been increased from the year 2006 to 2015. The average citation count per keratoplasty documents was 9.34.

Conclusions

There is a growing interest to the lamellar keratoplasty techniques especially the endothelial keratoplasty in the last decade.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Ple-Plakon PA, Shtein RM. Trends in corneal transplantation: indications and techniques. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25:300–5.CrossRefPubMed Ple-Plakon PA, Shtein RM. Trends in corneal transplantation: indications and techniques. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25:300–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim MH, Chung TY, Chung ES. A retrospective contralateral study comparing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2013;32:385–9.CrossRefPubMed Kim MH, Chung TY, Chung ES. A retrospective contralateral study comparing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2013;32:385–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kitzmann AS, Wandling GR, Sutphin JE, Goins KM, Wagoner MD. Comparison of outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for penetrating keratoplasty graft failure due to corneal edema. Int Ophthalmol. 2012;32:15–23.CrossRefPubMed Kitzmann AS, Wandling GR, Sutphin JE, Goins KM, Wagoner MD. Comparison of outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for penetrating keratoplasty graft failure due to corneal edema. Int Ophthalmol. 2012;32:15–23.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Holden G, Rosenberg G, Barker K. Bibliometrics: a potential decision making aid in hiring, reappointment, tenure and promotion decisions. Soc Work Health Care. 2005;41:67–92.CrossRefPubMed Holden G, Rosenberg G, Barker K. Bibliometrics: a potential decision making aid in hiring, reappointment, tenure and promotion decisions. Soc Work Health Care. 2005;41:67–92.CrossRefPubMed
6.
8.
go back to reference Wang J, Hasenfus A, Schirra F, Bohle RM, Seitz B, Szentmáry N. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Homburg/Saar from 2001 to 2010–histopathology of 1,200 corneal buttons. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:797–802.CrossRefPubMed Wang J, Hasenfus A, Schirra F, Bohle RM, Seitz B, Szentmáry N. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Homburg/Saar from 2001 to 2010–histopathology of 1,200 corneal buttons. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:797–802.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lang SJ, Bischoff M, Böhringer D, Seitz B, Reinhard T. Analysis of the changes in keratoplasty indications and preferred techniques. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lang SJ, Bischoff M, Böhringer D, Seitz B, Reinhard T. Analysis of the changes in keratoplasty indications and preferred techniques. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Galvis V, Tello A, Gomez AJ, Rangel CM, Prada AM, Camacho PA. Corneal transplantation at an ophthalmological referral center in Colombia: indications and techniques (2004–2011). Open Ophthalmol J. 2013;7:30–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Galvis V, Tello A, Gomez AJ, Rangel CM, Prada AM, Camacho PA. Corneal transplantation at an ophthalmological referral center in Colombia: indications and techniques (2004–2011). Open Ophthalmol J. 2013;7:30–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Jašinskas V, Rudalevičius P, Miliauskas A, Milčius D, Jurkūnas UV. Keratoprosthesis surgery as an alternative to keratoplasty. Medicina (Kaunas). 2013;49:291–9. Jašinskas V, Rudalevičius P, Miliauskas A, Milčius D, Jurkūnas UV. Keratoprosthesis surgery as an alternative to keratoplasty. Medicina (Kaunas). 2013;49:291–9.
13.
go back to reference Magalhães FP, Sousa LB, Oliveira LA. Boston type I keratoprosthesis: review. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2012;75:218–22.CrossRefPubMed Magalhães FP, Sousa LB, Oliveira LA. Boston type I keratoprosthesis: review. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2012;75:218–22.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Liu C, Hille K, Tan D, Hicks C, Herold J. Keratoprosthesis surgery. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008;41:171–86.CrossRefPubMed Liu C, Hille K, Tan D, Hicks C, Herold J. Keratoprosthesis surgery. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008;41:171–86.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kirkwood BJ. A short history of corneal transplantation: commemorating 100 years. Insight. 2006;31:15. Kirkwood BJ. A short history of corneal transplantation: commemorating 100 years. Insight. 2006;31:15.
16.
go back to reference Pleyer U, Schlickeiser S. The taming of the shrew? The immunology of corneal transplantation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87:488–97.CrossRefPubMed Pleyer U, Schlickeiser S. The taming of the shrew? The immunology of corneal transplantation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87:488–97.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Publication trends in corneal transplantation: a bibliometric analysis
Authors
Evre Pekel
Gökhan Pekel
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0379-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2016 Go to the issue