Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2010

01-05-2010 | Original Research Article

Public option and private profits

What do markets expect?

Author: Dr Fabio Milani

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The debate on US healthcare reform has largely focused on the introduction of a public health plan option. While supporters stress various beneficial effects that would arise from increased competition in the health insurance market, opponents often contend that a public plan would drive insurers out of the market and potentially lead to the ‘collapse’ of the private health insurance industry.

Objectives

To contribute to the US healthcare reform debate by inferring, from financial market data, the effect that the public option is likely to have on the private health insurance market.

Methods

The study utilized daily data on the price of a security that was traded in a prediction market from June 2009 and whose pay-off was tied to the event that a federal government-run healthcare plan — the ‘public option’ - would be approved by 31 December 2009 (100 daily observations). These data were combined with data on stock returns of health insurance companies (1500 observations from 100 trading days and 15 companies) to evaluate the expected effect of the public option on private health insurers. The impact on hospital companies (1000 observations) was also estimated.

Results

The results suggested that daily stock returns of health insurance companies significantly responded to the changing probability regarding the public option. A 10% increase in the probability that the public option would pass, on average, reduced the stock returns of health insurance companies by 1.28% (p < 0.001). Hospital company stock returns were also affected (0.9% reduction; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results reveal the market expectation of a negative effect of the public option on the value of health insurance companies. The magnitude of the effect suggests a downward adjustment in the expected profits of health insurers of around 13%, but it does not support more calamitous scenarios.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blendon RJ, Benson JM. Understanding how Americans view health care reform. N Engl J Med 2009; 361(9): e13PubMedCrossRef Blendon RJ, Benson JM. Understanding how Americans view health care reform. N Engl J Med 2009; 361(9): e13PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Keyhani S, Federman A. Doctors on coverage: physicians’ views on a new public insurance option and Medicare expansion. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: e24PubMedCrossRef Keyhani S, Federman A. Doctors on coverage: physicians’ views on a new public insurance option and Medicare expansion. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: e24PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Robinson JC. Consolidation and the transformation of competition in health insurance. Health Aff 2004; 23: 11–24CrossRef Robinson JC. Consolidation and the transformation of competition in health insurance. Health Aff 2004; 23: 11–24CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dafny L. Are health insurance markets competitive? [NBER working paper no. 14572]. Am Econ Rev. In press Dafny L. Are health insurance markets competitive? [NBER working paper no. 14572]. Am Econ Rev. In press
7.
go back to reference Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E. Interpreting prediction market prices as probabilities [NBER working paper no. 12200]. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 2006CrossRef Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E. Interpreting prediction market prices as probabilities [NBER working paper no. 12200]. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 2006CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E. Prediction markets. J Econ Perspect 2004; 18: 107–26CrossRef Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E. Prediction markets. J Econ Perspect 2004; 18: 107–26CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Arrow KJ, Forsythe R, Gorham M, et al. The promise of prediction markets. Science 2008; 320: 877–8PubMedCrossRef Arrow KJ, Forsythe R, Gorham M, et al. The promise of prediction markets. Science 2008; 320: 877–8PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Berg J, Forsythe R, Nelson F, et al. Results from a dozen years of election futures markets research. Handbook Exp Econ Results 2008; 80: 742–51CrossRef Berg J, Forsythe R, Nelson F, et al. Results from a dozen years of election futures markets research. Handbook Exp Econ Results 2008; 80: 742–51CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Knight B. Are policy platforms capitalized into equity prices? Evidence from the Bush/Gore 2000 Presidential Election. J Public Econ 2006; 90: 751–73CrossRef Knight B. Are policy platforms capitalized into equity prices? Evidence from the Bush/Gore 2000 Presidential Election. J Public Econ 2006; 90: 751–73CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wolfers J, Snowberg E, Zitzewitz E. Partisan impacts on the economy: evidence from prediction markets and close elections. Q J Econ 2007; 122: 807–29CrossRef Wolfers J, Snowberg E, Zitzewitz E. Partisan impacts on the economy: evidence from prediction markets and close elections. Q J Econ 2007; 122: 807–29CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E. Using markets to inform policy: the case of the Iraq War. Economica 2009; 76: 225–50CrossRef Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E. Using markets to inform policy: the case of the Iraq War. Economica 2009; 76: 225–50CrossRef
14.
go back to reference MacKinlay C, Lo AW, Campbell JY. The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press, 1997 MacKinlay C, Lo AW, Campbell JY. The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press, 1997
15.
go back to reference Tetlock PC. How efficient are information markets? Evidence from an online exchange. Austin (TX): University of Texas, 2004 Tetlock PC. How efficient are information markets? Evidence from an online exchange. Austin (TX): University of Texas, 2004
16.
go back to reference MacKinlay AC. Event studies in economics and finance. J Econ Lit 1997; 35: 13–39 MacKinlay AC. Event studies in economics and finance. J Econ Lit 1997; 35: 13–39
18.
go back to reference Affordable Health Care for America Act, HR 3962. Revised cost estimate for the bill as passed by the House of Representatives, 2009 Nov 20 Affordable Health Care for America Act, HR 3962. Revised cost estimate for the bill as passed by the House of Representatives, 2009 Nov 20
19.
go back to reference Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, HR 3590. Cost estimate for the amendment in the nature of a substitute to HR 3590, as proposed in the Senate, 2009 Nov 18 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, HR 3590. Cost estimate for the amendment in the nature of a substitute to HR 3590, as proposed in the Senate, 2009 Nov 18
20.
go back to reference Gruber J, Simon K. Crowd-out ten years later: have recent expansions of public insurance crowded out private health insurance? J Health Econ 2008; 27: 201–17PubMedCrossRef Gruber J, Simon K. Crowd-out ten years later: have recent expansions of public insurance crowded out private health insurance? J Health Econ 2008; 27: 201–17PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Public option and private profits
What do markets expect?
Author
Dr Fabio Milani
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11535510-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2010 Go to the issue