Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Public Health | Research article

Men’s sheds as an alternative healthcare route? A qualitative study of the impact of Men’s sheds on user’s health improvement behaviours

Authors: Danielle Kelly, Artur Steiner, Helen Mason, Simon Teasdale

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Men’s health is a globally underrepresented area of research and policy. With men facing numerous healthcare barriers, there are calls for more ‘male friendly’ approaches to health improvement that take into consideration differing male behaviours and attitudes towards health. Men’s Sheds are community-based organisations delivering practical and social activities that encourage positive health behaviours. While Sheds have been recognised for their health and wellbeing benefits to men, research has yet to explore the impacts of Sheds on male health improvement and their potential role as a preventative gendered public health measure.

Methods

The study used in-depth interviews with 62 Shed members from five Sheds to investigate the impacts of Shed activity on the health improvement behaviours and attitudes of Shed users. Findings from the qualitative study were used to propose a set of pathways in which Sheds activity led to positive health engagement.

Results

The proposed pathways suggest that there are many different and interlinked ways in which Shed activities can impact on the health behaviours and attitudes of Shed users. Through participation in various practical and social activities in an inclusive environment, Shed users reported increases in their health seeking behaviours, improved perspectives on and management of their personal health, and an increased ability to overcome illness and recover.

Conclusions

Where male friendly health provision has been lacking, this study suggests how Men’s Shed activities can provide positive male health outcomes, often in unexpected and non-obvious ways. In particular, the proposed visual pathways are important to inform policymakers and practitioners of the ways in that Sheds may contribute to engaging men in health improvement practices and increase their health knowledge. This study also provides a structure from which further studies can measure and evaluate Shed health impacts.
Footnotes
1
Reported diagnosed health issues across all Shed included physical illness/injury; cancer, strokes, heart conditions, brain injuries, kidney failure, skin conditions, age related mobility issues (arthritis/ osteoporosis), and pain from accident/trauma. Also illness related to mental health and mental ability; mental breakdowns (psychosis, PTSD), alcohol addiction, Alzheimer’s/ Dementia, depression and anxiety.
 
Literature
9.
go back to reference Robertson C, Archibald D, Avenell A, Douglas F, Hoddinott P, Van Teijlingen E, Boyers D, Stewart F, Boachie C, Fioratou E, Wilkins D. Systematic reviews of and integrated report on the quantitative, qualitative and economic evidence base for the management of obesity in men. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(35):1–424. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta18350.CrossRef Robertson C, Archibald D, Avenell A, Douglas F, Hoddinott P, Van Teijlingen E, Boyers D, Stewart F, Boachie C, Fioratou E, Wilkins D. Systematic reviews of and integrated report on the quantitative, qualitative and economic evidence base for the management of obesity in men. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18(35):1–424. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3310/​hta18350.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mansfield AK, Addis ME, Mahalik JR. " Why won't he go to the doctor?": The psychology of men's help seeking. Int J Mens Health. 2003;31(2):93–110 https://doi.org/10.1.1.868.8560.CrossRef Mansfield AK, Addis ME, Mahalik JR. " Why won't he go to the doctor?": The psychology of men's help seeking. Int J Mens Health. 2003;31(2):93–110 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1.​1.​868.​8560.​CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hunt K, Wyke S, Gray CM, Anderson AS, Brady A, Bunn C, Donnan PT, Fenwick E, Grieve E, Leishman J, Miller E. A gender-sensitised weight loss and healthy living programme for overweight and obese men delivered by Scottish Premier League football clubs (FFIT): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;5(383:9924):1211–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62420-4.CrossRef Hunt K, Wyke S, Gray CM, Anderson AS, Brady A, Bunn C, Donnan PT, Fenwick E, Grieve E, Leishman J, Miller E. A gender-sensitised weight loss and healthy living programme for overweight and obese men delivered by Scottish Premier League football clubs (FFIT): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;5(383:9924):1211–21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(13)62420-4.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gough B. Analysis of men’s health promotion with particular reference to an obesity reduction manual. In Gough B, Robertson S.(Eds.). Men, masculinities and health: Critical perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave. pp. 125–143. Gough B. Analysis of men’s health promotion with particular reference to an obesity reduction manual. In Gough B, Robertson S.(Eds.). Men, masculinities and health: Critical perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave. pp. 125–143.
23.
go back to reference Earle L, Earle T, Von Mering O. Sheds and male retirement: the place to go and come back from. Australas Leis Pleasure J. 1996;1(1):5–19. Earle L, Earle T, Von Mering O. Sheds and male retirement: the place to go and come back from. Australas Leis Pleasure J. 1996;1(1):5–19.
27.
go back to reference Morgan N. A room of their own: Men's sheds build communities of support and purpose. Cross Curr. 2010;13(4):12–3. Morgan N. A room of their own: Men's sheds build communities of support and purpose. Cross Curr. 2010;13(4):12–3.
36.
go back to reference Bryman B, Bell E. Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Bryman B, Bell E. Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
37.
go back to reference Yeo A, Legard R, Keegan J, Ward K, McNaughton-Nicholls C, Lewis J. In-depth interviews. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE; 2013. P138–169. Yeo A, Legard R, Keegan J, Ward K, McNaughton-Nicholls C, Lewis J. In-depth interviews. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE; 2013. P138–169.
40.
go back to reference Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd Ed). London: SAGE Publications; 2015. Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd Ed). London: SAGE Publications; 2015.
Metadata
Title
Men’s sheds as an alternative healthcare route? A qualitative study of the impact of Men’s sheds on user’s health improvement behaviours
Authors
Danielle Kelly
Artur Steiner
Helen Mason
Simon Teasdale
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Public Health
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10585-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Public Health 1/2021 Go to the issue