Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Public Health | Protocol

Impact of child development at primary school entry on adolescent health—protocol for a participatory systematic review

Authors: Michelle Black, Amy Barnes, Mark Strong, David Taylor-Robinson

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reducing child health inequalities is a global health priority and evidence suggests that optimal development of knowledge, skills and attributes in early childhood could reduce health risks across the life course. Despite a strong policy rhetoric on giving children the ‘best start in life’, socioeconomic inequalities in children’s development when they start school persist. So too do inequalities in child and adolescent health. These in turn influence health inequalities in adulthood. Understanding how developmental processes affect health in the context of socioeconomic factors as children age could inform a holistic policy approach to health and development from childhood through to adolescence. However, the relationship between child development and early adolescent health consequences is poorly understood. Therefore the aim of this review is to summarise evidence on the associations between child development at primary school starting age (3–7 years) and subsequent health in adolescence (8–15 years) and the factors that mediate or moderate this relationship.

Method

A participatory systematic review method will be used. The search strategy will include; searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ASSIA and ERIC) from November 1990 onwards, grey literature, reference searches and discussions with stakeholders. Articles will be screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria at title and abstract level, and at full article level. Observational, intervention and review studies reporting a measure of child development at the age of starting school and health outcomes in early adolescence, from a member country of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, will be included. The primary outcome will be health and wellbeing outcomes (such as weight, mental health, socio-emotional behaviour, dietary habits). Secondary outcomes will include educational outcomes. Studies will be assessed for quality using appropriate tools. A conceptual model, produced with stakeholders at the outset of the study, will act as a framework for extracting and analysing evidence. The model will be refined through analysis of the included literature. Narrative synthesis will be used to generate findings and produce a diagram of the relationship between child development and adolescent health.

Discussion

The review will elucidate how children’s development at the age of starting school is related to subsequent health outcomes in contexts of socioeconomic inequality. This will inform ways to intervene to improve health and reduce health inequality in adolescents. The findings will generate knowledge of cross-sector relevance for health and education and promote inter-sectoral coherence in addressing health inequalities throughout childhood.

Protocol Registration

This systematic review protocol has been registered with PROSPERO CRD42020210011.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Irwin L, Siddiqi A, Hertzman C, WHO Commision on Social Determinants of Health. Early Child Development: A powerful equalizer. 2007. Irwin L, Siddiqi A, Hertzman C, WHO Commision on Social Determinants of Health. Early Child Development: A powerful equalizer. 2007.
6.
go back to reference Bundy DAP, de Silva N, Horton S, Patton GC, Schultz L, Jamison DT. Child and adolescent health and development: realizing neglected potential.” In Disease Control Priorities In: Bundy DAP, de Silva N, Horton S, Jamison DT, Patton GC, editors. Child and Adolescent Health and Development,. 8. Third ed. Washington DC: World Bank; 2017. Bundy DAP, de Silva N, Horton S, Patton GC, Schultz L, Jamison DT. Child and adolescent health and development: realizing neglected potential.” In Disease Control Priorities In: Bundy DAP, de Silva N, Horton S, Jamison DT, Patton GC, editors. Child and Adolescent Health and Development,. 8. Third ed. Washington DC: World Bank; 2017.
7.
go back to reference Melhuish E. Longitudinal research and early years policy development in the UK. Int J Child Care Educ Policy. 2016;10(1):1–18.CrossRef Melhuish E. Longitudinal research and early years policy development in the UK. Int J Child Care Educ Policy. 2016;10(1):1–18.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Isaacs JB. Starting school at a disadvantage: the school readiness of poor children. The Social Genome Project. Center on Children and Families at Brookings. 2012. Isaacs JB. Starting school at a disadvantage: the school readiness of poor children. The Social Genome Project. Center on Children and Families at Brookings. 2012.
12.
go back to reference Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. State of Child Health 2020. RCPCH; 2020 March 2020. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. State of Child Health 2020. RCPCH; 2020 March 2020.
13.
go back to reference Taylor-Robinson DC, Lai ET, Whitehead M, Barr B. Child health unravelling in UK. BMJ. 2019;364:l963.CrossRefPubMed Taylor-Robinson DC, Lai ET, Whitehead M, Barr B. Child health unravelling in UK. BMJ. 2019;364:l963.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Goodman A, Joshi H, Nasim B, Tyler C. Social and emotional skills in childhood and their long-term effects on adult life. UCL Institute of Education: a review for the early intervention foundation: early intervention foundation; 2015. Goodman A, Joshi H, Nasim B, Tyler C. Social and emotional skills in childhood and their long-term effects on adult life. UCL Institute of Education: a review for the early intervention foundation: early intervention foundation; 2015.
17.
go back to reference Washbrook EV, Waldfogel J. On your marks: measuring the school readiness of children in low-to-middle income families. University of Bristol: Resolution Foundation; 2011. Washbrook EV, Waldfogel J. On your marks: measuring the school readiness of children in low-to-middle income families. University of Bristol: Resolution Foundation; 2011.
18.
go back to reference van Zwieten A, Saglimbene V, Teixeira-Pinto A, Howell M, Howard K, Craig JC, et al. The impact of age on income-related health status inequalities from birth to adolescence: a systematic review with cross-country comparisons. J Pediatr. 2018;203:380–90.e14.CrossRefPubMed van Zwieten A, Saglimbene V, Teixeira-Pinto A, Howell M, Howard K, Craig JC, et al. The impact of age on income-related health status inequalities from birth to adolescence: a systematic review with cross-country comparisons. J Pediatr. 2018;203:380–90.e14.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pan Q, Trang KT, Love HR, Templin J. School readiness profiles and growth in academic achievement. Front Educ. 2019;4(127). Pan Q, Trang KT, Love HR, Templin J. School readiness profiles and growth in academic achievement. Front Educ. 2019;4(127).
25.
go back to reference Cattan S, Conti G, Farquharson C, Ginja R. The health effects of Sure Start. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies; 2019. Cattan S, Conti G, Farquharson C, Ginja R. The health effects of Sure Start. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies; 2019.
26.
go back to reference Straatmann VS, Pearce A, Hope S, et al. How well can poor child health and development be predicted by data collected in early childhood? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72:1132–40. Straatmann VS, Pearce A, Hope S, et al. How well can poor child health and development be predicted by data collected in early childhood? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72:1132–40.
28.
go back to reference Dornan P, Woodhead M. How inequalities develop through childhood: life course evidence from the young lives cohort study,. Office of Research Discussion Paper No.2015-01, UNICEF Office of Research, Florence.; 2015. Dornan P, Woodhead M. How inequalities develop through childhood: life course evidence from the young lives cohort study,. Office of Research Discussion Paper No.2015-01, UNICEF Office of Research, Florence.; 2015.
29.
go back to reference Pearce A, Dundas R, Whitehead M, Taylor-Robinson D. Pathways to inequalities in child health. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2019(1468-2044 (Electronic)). Pearce A, Dundas R, Whitehead M, Taylor-Robinson D. Pathways to inequalities in child health. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2019(1468-2044 (Electronic)).
31.
33.
go back to reference Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Weiss CH, editor Nothing as Practical as Good Theory : Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families 2011. Weiss CH, editor Nothing as Practical as Good Theory : Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families 2011.
38.
go back to reference Black M, Barnes A, Baxter S, Beynon C, Clowes M, Dallat M, et al. Learning across the UK: a review of public health systems and policy approaches to early child development since political devolution. J Public Health. 2019. Black M, Barnes A, Baxter S, Beynon C, Clowes M, Dallat M, et al. Learning across the UK: a review of public health systems and policy approaches to early child development since political devolution. J Public Health. 2019.
39.
go back to reference Bracken BA. Bracken Basic Concept Scale - Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp; 1998. Bracken BA. Bracken Basic Concept Scale - Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp; 1998.
40.
go back to reference Pope D. Introduction to systematic reviews (lecture). Liverpool: University of Liverpool; 2015. Pope D. Introduction to systematic reviews (lecture). Liverpool: University of Liverpool; 2015.
42.
go back to reference Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, Katikireddi SV, Brennan SE, Ellis S, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368:l6890.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, Katikireddi SV, Brennan SE, Ellis S, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368:l6890.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Multisectoral and intersectoral action for improved health and wellbeing for all: mapping of the WHO Eurpoean Region. Governance for a sustainable future: imprving health and wellbeing for all. 2018. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Multisectoral and intersectoral action for improved health and wellbeing for all: mapping of the WHO Eurpoean Region. Governance for a sustainable future: imprving health and wellbeing for all. 2018.
Metadata
Title
Impact of child development at primary school entry on adolescent health—protocol for a participatory systematic review
Authors
Michelle Black
Amy Barnes
Mark Strong
David Taylor-Robinson
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Public Health
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01694-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Systematic Reviews 1/2021 Go to the issue