Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Breastfeeding Journal 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Public Health | Research

Historical-qualitative analysis of breastfeeding trends in three OECD countries

Author: Amanda Marie Lubold

Published in: International Breastfeeding Journal | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Breastfeeding rates among high income, western countries vary considerably. This research examines three countries, Sweden, Ireland, and the United States, with respect to both public health initiatives and policy initiatives.

Methods

This article uses a historical qualitative analysis of breastfeeding rates over time. It uses the welfare state structure as a framework for understanding the variation in breastfeeding outcomes among these three countries.

Results

With its strong family policies and early adherence to international public health recommendations, Sweden was able to build high rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration. However, Sweden’s breastfeeding rates have been declining, which may be a result of increasing encouragement for fathers to take equal leave, and because Sweden is no longer prioritizing breastfeeding in its public health goals. Ireland has experienced rapid growth of both breastfeeding initiation and participation in the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, though its rates still lag behind much of the Western world. The United States has seen increases in participation with the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, but lacks state support in public health and labor policies.

Conclusion

This analysis suggests that in a country with a strong welfare state and early adoption of internationally recommended public policy, breastfeeding is able to flourish. It also suggests that the Baby-Friendly hospital Initiative is a predictor of breastfeeding success.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wolf JH. Low breastfeeding rates and public health in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(12):2000–10.CrossRef Wolf JH. Low breastfeeding rates and public health in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(12):2000–10.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Baumslag N, Michels DL. Milk, money, and madness: the culture and politics of breastfeeding. Westport: Bergin & Garvey; 1995. Baumslag N, Michels DL. Milk, money, and madness: the culture and politics of breastfeeding. Westport: Bergin & Garvey; 1995.
3.
go back to reference United Nations Children’s Fund. Celebrating the Innocenti declaration on the protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding: past achievements, present challenges and priority actions for infant and young child feeding. 2nd ed. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre; 2006. United Nations Children’s Fund. Celebrating the Innocenti declaration on the protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding: past achievements, present challenges and priority actions for infant and young child feeding. 2nd ed. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre; 2006.
4.
go back to reference Galtry J. The impact on breastfeeding of labour market policy and practice in Ireland, Sweden, and the USA. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(1):167–77.CrossRef Galtry J. The impact on breastfeeding of labour market policy and practice in Ireland, Sweden, and the USA. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(1):167–77.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference European Commission. EU project on promotion of breastfeeding in Europe. Protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding in Europe: a blueprint for action (revised). Luxembourg: Directorate Public Health and Risk Assessment; 2008. European Commission. EU project on promotion of breastfeeding in Europe. Protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding in Europe: a blueprint for action (revised). Luxembourg: Directorate Public Health and Risk Assessment; 2008.
6.
go back to reference Cattaneo A, Yngve A, Koletzko B, Ruiz Guzman L. Protection, promotion and support of breast-feeding in Europe: current situation. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8(1):39–46.CrossRef Cattaneo A, Yngve A, Koletzko B, Ruiz Guzman L. Protection, promotion and support of breast-feeding in Europe: current situation. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8(1):39–46.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference European Commission. Health Programme 2008–2013: Together for health. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2012. European Commission. Health Programme 2008–2013: Together for health. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2012.
8.
go back to reference Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity; 1990. Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity; 1990.
9.
go back to reference World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Geneva. 1999. World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Geneva. 1999.
10.
go back to reference Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. 2016;387(10017):491–504.CrossRef Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. 2016;387(10017):491–504.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ireland Health Research and Information Division. Perinatal statistics report 2010: Economic and Social Research Institute; 2012. Ireland Health Research and Information Division. Perinatal statistics report 2010: Economic and Social Research Institute; 2012.
13.
go back to reference Hofvander Y. Breastfeeding and the baby friendly hospitals initiative (BFHI): organization, response and outcome in Sweden and other countries. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(8):1012–6.CrossRef Hofvander Y. Breastfeeding and the baby friendly hospitals initiative (BFHI): organization, response and outcome in Sweden and other countries. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(8):1012–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gotvall K. Breast-feeding and smoking habits among parents of infants born in 2009. Official Statistics of Sweden: Health and Medical Care. 2009. Gotvall K. Breast-feeding and smoking habits among parents of infants born in 2009. Official Statistics of Sweden: Health and Medical Care. 2009.
15.
go back to reference Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD family database CO1.5. OECD - Social Policy Division - Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Affairs; 2009. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD family database CO1.5. OECD - Social Policy Division - Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Affairs; 2009.
16.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding among U.S. children born 2002–2014, CDC national immunization survey. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2017. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding among U.S. children born 2002–2014, CDC national immunization survey. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2017.
17.
go back to reference Purdy J, McAvoy H, Cotter N. Breastfeeding on the island of Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Health in Ireland; 2017. Purdy J, McAvoy H, Cotter N. Breastfeeding on the island of Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Health in Ireland; 2017.
18.
go back to reference Turck D. [History of complementary feeding]. Archives de Pediatrie: Organe Officiel de la Societe Francaise de Pediatrie 2010;17:S191–S194. Turck D. [History of complementary feeding]. Archives de Pediatrie: Organe Officiel de la Societe Francaise de Pediatrie 2010;17:S191–S194.
20.
go back to reference Orloff AS. Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: an unfinished agenda. Sociological Theory. 2009;27:317–43.CrossRef Orloff AS. Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: an unfinished agenda. Sociological Theory. 2009;27:317–43.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Boeckmann I, Misra J, Budig MJ. Cultural and institutional factors shaping mothers' employment and working hours in postindustrial countries. Social Forces. 2014;93:1301–33.CrossRef Boeckmann I, Misra J, Budig MJ. Cultural and institutional factors shaping mothers' employment and working hours in postindustrial countries. Social Forces. 2014;93:1301–33.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference World Health Organization. The Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Ireland (BFHI) - Health Promotion and Quality Care. http://www.who.int/nutrition/events/2016_bfhi_congress_presentation_ireland_casestudies.pdf (2016). Accessed 27 June 2017. World Health Organization. The Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Ireland (BFHI) - Health Promotion and Quality Care. http://​www.​who.​int/​nutrition/​events/​2016_​bfhi_​congress_​presentation_​ireland_​casestudies.​pdf (2016). Accessed 27 June 2017.
24.
go back to reference Grguric J, Wen RA, Kylberg E, Ashmore S, MacEnroe T. International perspectives on the Baby-Friendly initiative. J Hum Lact. 2012;28(3):281–4.CrossRef Grguric J, Wen RA, Kylberg E, Ashmore S, MacEnroe T. International perspectives on the Baby-Friendly initiative. J Hum Lact. 2012;28(3):281–4.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Labbok MH. Global baby-friendly hospital initiative monitoring data: update and discussion. Breastfeed Med. 2012;7(4):210–22.CrossRef Labbok MH. Global baby-friendly hospital initiative monitoring data: update and discussion. Breastfeed Med. 2012;7(4):210–22.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Country experiences with the baby-friendly hospital initiative: compendium of case studies around the world, vol. 2017. Geneva. World Health Organization. Country experiences with the baby-friendly hospital initiative: compendium of case studies around the world, vol. 2017. Geneva.
29.
go back to reference World Health Organization/United Nations Children’s Fund. Comparative Analysis of Implementation of the Innocenti Declaration in WHO European Member States Geneva; 1999. World Health Organization/United Nations Children’s Fund. Comparative Analysis of Implementation of the Innocenti Declaration in WHO European Member States Geneva; 1999.
30.
go back to reference International Labour Organization. Maternity protection convention, no 183. Geneva, 88th ILC session; 2000. International Labour Organization. Maternity protection convention, no 183. Geneva, 88th ILC session; 2000.
32.
go back to reference Ray R. A detailed look at parental leave policies in 21 OECD countries. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research; 2008. Ray R. A detailed look at parental leave policies in 21 OECD countries. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research; 2008.
33.
go back to reference Ray R, Gornick JC, Schmitt J. Who cares? Assessing generosity and gender equality in parental leave policy designs in 21 countries. J Eur Soc Policy. 2010;20(3):196–216.CrossRef Ray R, Gornick JC, Schmitt J. Who cares? Assessing generosity and gender equality in parental leave policy designs in 21 countries. J Eur Soc Policy. 2010;20(3):196–216.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics. Healthy people 2010 final review. Hyattsville, MD; 2012. National Center for Health Statistics. Healthy people 2010 final review. Hyattsville, MD; 2012.
37.
go back to reference Swedish code of statutes. Law (2013: 1054) on the marketing of infant formulas and follow-on formula. Stockholm: Riksdag; 2013. Swedish code of statutes. Law (2013: 1054) on the marketing of infant formulas and follow-on formula. Stockholm: Riksdag; 2013.
39.
go back to reference Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD family database: PF2.1. OECD - Social Policy Division - Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Affairs; 2009. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD family database: PF2.1. OECD - Social Policy Division - Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Affairs; 2009.
40.
go back to reference International Labour Organization. Maternity and paternity at work: law and practice across the world. Geneva; 2014. International Labour Organization. Maternity and paternity at work: law and practice across the world. Geneva; 2014.
43.
go back to reference NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre. An international comparison study into the implementation of the WHO code and other breastfeeding initiatives. Australia: Department of Health; 2011. NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre. An international comparison study into the implementation of the WHO code and other breastfeeding initiatives. Australia: Department of Health; 2011.
44.
go back to reference DOHC. Interim Report of the National Committee on Breastfeeding. Health promotion unit. Department of Health and Children: Dublin; 2003. DOHC. Interim Report of the National Committee on Breastfeeding. Health promotion unit. Department of Health and Children: Dublin; 2003.
45.
go back to reference Ireland Ministry of Health and Children. Breastfeeding in Ireland: a five-year strategic action plan. National Committee on breastfeeding: Ireland Department of Health and Children; 2005. Ireland Ministry of Health and Children. Breastfeeding in Ireland: a five-year strategic action plan. National Committee on breastfeeding: Ireland Department of Health and Children; 2005.
48.
go back to reference Pfau-Effinger B. Culture and welfare state policies: reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy. 2005;34:3–20.CrossRef Pfau-Effinger B. Culture and welfare state policies: reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy. 2005;34:3–20.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Aboim S. Gender cultures and the division of labour in contemporary Europe: a cross-national perspective. Sociol Rev. 2010;58:171–96.CrossRef Aboim S. Gender cultures and the division of labour in contemporary Europe: a cross-national perspective. Sociol Rev. 2010;58:171–96.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Tarrant RC, Younger KM, Sheridan-Pereira M, White MJ, Kearney JM. The prevalence and determinants of breast-feeding initiation and duration in a sample of women in Ireland. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(6):760–70.CrossRef Tarrant RC, Younger KM, Sheridan-Pereira M, White MJ, Kearney JM. The prevalence and determinants of breast-feeding initiation and duration in a sample of women in Ireland. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(6):760–70.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Tarrant R, Kearney J. Breastfeeding practices in Ireland: a review. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:371–80.CrossRef Tarrant R, Kearney J. Breastfeeding practices in Ireland: a review. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:371–80.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Ruhm CJ. Parental leave and child health. J Health Econ. 2000;19(6):931–60.CrossRef Ruhm CJ. Parental leave and child health. J Health Econ. 2000;19(6):931–60.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Brady JP. Marketing breast milk substitutes: problems and perils throughout the world. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(6):529–32.CrossRef Brady JP. Marketing breast milk substitutes: problems and perils throughout the world. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(6):529–32.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Shealy KR, Li R, Benton-Davis S, Grummer-Strawn LM. The CDC guide to breastfeeding interventions. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2005. Shealy KR, Li R, Benton-Davis S, Grummer-Strawn LM. The CDC guide to breastfeeding interventions. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2005.
55.
go back to reference Jacobs A. Opposition to breast-feeding resolution by US stuns world health officials. The New York times. July 8 2018. Jacobs A. Opposition to breast-feeding resolution by US stuns world health officials. The New York times. July 8 2018.
Metadata
Title
Historical-qualitative analysis of breastfeeding trends in three OECD countries
Author
Amanda Marie Lubold
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Public Health
Published in
International Breastfeeding Journal / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1746-4358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0230-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Breastfeeding Journal 1/2019 Go to the issue