Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Public Health | Symposium: COVID-19

Applying a Precautionary Approach to Mobile Contact Tracing for COVID-19: The Value of Reversibility

Authors: Niels Nijsingh, Anne van Bergen, Verina Wild

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic presents unprecedented challenges to public health decision-making. Specifically, the lack of evidence and the urgency with which a response is called for, raise the ethical challenge of assessing how much (and what kind of) evidence is required for the justification of interventions in response to the various threats we face. Here we discuss the intervention of introducing technology that aims to trace and alert contacts of infected persons—contact tracing (CT) technology. Determining whether such an intervention is proportional is complicated by complex trade-offs and feedback loops. We suggest that the resulting uncertainties necessitate a precautionary approach. On the one hand, precautionary reasons support CT technology as a means to contribute to the prevention of harms caused by alternative interventions, or COVID-19 itself. On the other hand, however, both the extent to which such technology itself present risks of serious harm, as well as its effectiveness, remain unclear. We therefore argue that a precautionary approach should put reversibility of CT technology at the forefront. We outline several practical implications.
Literature
go back to reference Cho, H., D. Ippolito, and Y.W. Yu. 2020. Contact tracing mobile apps for COVID-19: Privacy considerations and related trade-offs. arXiv Preprint: 12pp. arxiv.org/abs/2003.11511. Accessed July 7, 2020. Cho, H., D. Ippolito, and Y.W. Yu. 2020. Contact tracing mobile apps for COVID-19: Privacy considerations and related trade-offs. arXiv Preprint: 12pp. arxiv.org/abs/2003.11511. Accessed July 7, 2020.
go back to reference Gasser, U., M. Ienca, M. J. Scheibner, et al. 2020. Digital tools against COVID-19: Framing the ethical challenges and how to address them. arXiv Preprint:14pp. arxiv.org/abs/2004.10236. Accessed July 7, 2020. Gasser, U., M. Ienca, M. J. Scheibner, et al. 2020. Digital tools against COVID-19: Framing the ethical challenges and how to address them. arXiv Preprint:14pp. arxiv.org/abs/2004.10236. Accessed July 7, 2020.
go back to reference Ienca, M., and E. Vayena. 2020. On the responsible use of digital data to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature medicine 26(4): 463-464.CrossRef Ienca, M., and E. Vayena. 2020. On the responsible use of digital data to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature medicine 26(4): 463-464.CrossRef
go back to reference Munthe, C. 2011. The price of precaution and the ethics of risk. Vol. 6. International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology: Springer Netherlands. Munthe, C. 2011. The price of precaution and the ethics of risk. Vol. 6. International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology: Springer Netherlands.
go back to reference Munthe, C., and N. Nijsingh. 2019. Cutting red tape to manage public health threats: An ethical dilemma of expediting antibiotic drug innovation. Bioethics 33(7): 785-791.CrossRef Munthe, C., and N. Nijsingh. 2019. Cutting red tape to manage public health threats: An ethical dilemma of expediting antibiotic drug innovation. Bioethics 33(7): 785-791.CrossRef
go back to reference Nijsingh, N., D.G.J. Larsson, K. Persson de Fine-Licht, and C. Munthe. Forthcoming. Justifying antibiotic resistance interventions: Uncertainty, precaution and ethics. In: Ethics and drug resistance: Collective responsibility for global public health, edited by E. Jamrozik and M. Selgelid. In press: Springer International Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27874-8. Nijsingh, N., D.G.J. Larsson, K. Persson de Fine-Licht, and C. Munthe. Forthcoming. Justifying antibiotic resistance interventions: Uncertainty, precaution and ethics. In: Ethics and drug resistance: Collective responsibility for global public health, edited by E. Jamrozik and M. Selgelid. In press: Springer International Publishing. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-27874-8.
go back to reference Parker, M.J., C. Fraser, L. Abeler-Dörner, and D. Bonsall. 2020. Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Ethics 46(7): 427–431.CrossRef Parker, M.J., C. Fraser, L. Abeler-Dörner, and D. Bonsall. 2020. Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Ethics 46(7): 427–431.CrossRef
go back to reference Selgelid, M.J., A. McLean, N. Arinaminpathy, and J. Savulescu (eds). 2014. Infectious disease ethics: Limiting liberty in contexts of contagion. Springer Netherlands. Selgelid, M.J., A. McLean, N. Arinaminpathy, and J. Savulescu (eds). 2014. Infectious disease ethics: Limiting liberty in contexts of contagion. Springer Netherlands.
go back to reference Steel, D. 2015. Philosophy and the precautionary principle: Science, evidence, and environmental policy. Cambridge University Press. Steel, D. 2015. Philosophy and the precautionary principle: Science, evidence, and environmental policy. Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Trouwborst, A. 2009. Prevention, precaution, logic and law—The relationship between the precautionary principle and the preventative principle in international law and associated questions. Erasmus Law Review 2: 105. Trouwborst, A. 2009. Prevention, precaution, logic and law—The relationship between the precautionary principle and the preventative principle in international law and associated questions. Erasmus Law Review 2: 105.
go back to reference Viens A.M., C.M. Bensimon, and R.E.G. Upshur. 2009. Your liberty or your life: Reciprocity in the use of restrictive measures in contexts of contagion. Bioethical Inquiry 6(2): 207–217.CrossRef Viens A.M., C.M. Bensimon, and R.E.G. Upshur. 2009. Your liberty or your life: Reciprocity in the use of restrictive measures in contexts of contagion. Bioethical Inquiry 6(2): 207–217.CrossRef
go back to reference Wild, V., A. Buyx, S. Hurst, et al. 2020. Covid-19: Eine ad hoc public-health-ethikberatung. Das Gesundheitswesen 82(06): 507-513.CrossRef Wild, V., A. Buyx, S. Hurst, et al. 2020. Covid-19: Eine ad hoc public-health-ethikberatung. Das Gesundheitswesen 82(06): 507-513.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Applying a Precautionary Approach to Mobile Contact Tracing for COVID-19: The Value of Reversibility
Authors
Niels Nijsingh
Anne van Bergen
Verina Wild
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10004-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4/2020 Go to the issue