Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Public Health | Research article

A cost-effectiveness analysis of community water fluoridation for schoolchildren

Authors: Jodi Cronin, Stephen Moore, Máiréad Harding, Helen Whelton, Noel Woods

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Community water fluoridation (CWF), the controlled addition of fluoride to the water supply for the prevention of dental caries (tooth decay), is considered a safe and effective public health intervention. The Republic of Ireland (Ireland) is the only country in Europe with a legislative mandate for the fluoridation of the public water supply, a key component of its oral health policy. However, more recently, there has been an increase in public concern around the relevance of the intervention given the current environment of multiple fluoride sources and a reported increase in the prevalence of enamel fluorosis. The aim of this economic analysis is to provide evidence to inform policy decisions on whether the continued public investment in community water fluoridation remains justified under these altered circumstances.

Methods

Following traditional methods of economic evaluation and using epidemiological data from a representative sample of 5-, 8-, and 12-year-old schoolchildren, this cost-effectiveness analysis, conducted from the health-payer perspective, compared the incremental costs and consequences associated with the CWF intervention to no intervention for schoolchildren living in Ireland in 2017. A probabilistic model was developed to simulate the potential lifetime treatment savings associated with the schoolchildren’s exposure to the intervention for one year.

Results

In 2017, approximately 71% of people living in Ireland had access to a publicly provided fluoridated water supply at an average per capita cost to the state of €2.15. The total cost of CWF provision to 5-, 8-, and 12-year-old schoolchildren (n = 148,910) was estimated at €320,664, and the incremental cost per decayed, missing, or filled tooth (d3vcmft/D3vcMFT) prevented was calculated at €14.09. The potential annual lifetime treatment savings associated with caries prevented for this cohort was estimated at €2.95 million. When the potential treatment savings were included in the analysis, the incremental cost per d3vcmft/D3vcMFT prevented was -€115.67, representing a cost-saving to the health-payer and a positive return on investment. The results of the analysis were robust to both deterministic and probability sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

Despite current access to numerous fluoride sources and a reported increase in the prevalence of enamel fluorosis, CWF remains a cost-effective public health intervention for Irish schoolchildren.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
adjusted to EU19 prices (5).
 
2
The probability of receiving an amalgam given that you received an extraction at your previous visit is of course zero.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858.CrossRef James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Eaton K. The state of oral health in Europe. Report commissioned by the platform for better oral health in Europe. Platform for Better Oral Health in Europe Brussels; 2012. Eaton K. The state of oral health in Europe. Report commissioned by the platform for better oral health in Europe. Platform for Better Oral Health in Europe Brussels; 2012.
4.
go back to reference Harding MA, O’Mullane DM. Water fluoridation and oral health. Acta Med Acad. 2013;42(2):131.CrossRef Harding MA, O’Mullane DM. Water fluoridation and oral health. Acta Med Acad. 2013;42(2):131.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Righolt A, Jevdjevic M, Marcenes W, Listl S. Global-, regional-, and country-level economic impacts of dental diseases in 2015. J Dent Res. 2018;97(5):501–7.CrossRef Righolt A, Jevdjevic M, Marcenes W, Listl S. Global-, regional-, and country-level economic impacts of dental diseases in 2015. J Dent Res. 2018;97(5):501–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ajiboye AS, Dawson DR III, Fox CH, Committee ASI. American Association for Dental Research Policy Statement on Community Water Fluoridation. J Dent Res. 2018;97(12):1293–6.CrossRef Ajiboye AS, Dawson DR III, Fox CH, Committee ASI. American Association for Dental Research Policy Statement on Community Water Fluoridation. J Dent Res. 2018;97(12):1293–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wdf FDI. FDI policy statement on promoting oral health through water fluoridation: revised version adopted by the FDI General Assembly: 13 September 2014, New Delhi, India. Int Dent J. 2014;64(6):293.CrossRef Wdf FDI. FDI policy statement on promoting oral health through water fluoridation: revised version adopted by the FDI General Assembly: 13 September 2014, New Delhi, India. Int Dent J. 2014;64(6):293.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ten great public health achievements–United States, 1900–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48(12):241–3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ten great public health achievements–United States, 1900–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48(12):241–3.
13.
go back to reference O’Mullane D, Whelton H, Costelloe P, McDermott S, McLoughlin J. The results of water fluoridation in Ireland. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56(5):259–64.CrossRef O’Mullane D, Whelton H, Costelloe P, McDermott S, McLoughlin J. The results of water fluoridation in Ireland. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56(5):259–64.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dean HT. Classification of mottled enamel diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 1922. 1934;21(8):1421–6. Dean HT. Classification of mottled enamel diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 1922. 1934;21(8):1421–6.
20.
go back to reference Tobin Consulting Engineers. National audit of the water fluoridation process at water treatment plants in Ireland. Dublin: The Irish Expert Body on Fluorides and Health; 2011. Tobin Consulting Engineers. National audit of the water fluoridation process at water treatment plants in Ireland. Dublin: The Irish Expert Body on Fluorides and Health; 2011.
21.
go back to reference Birch S. The relative cost effectiveness of water fluoridation across communities: analysis of variations according to underlying caries levels. Community Dent Health. 1990;7(1):3–10.PubMed Birch S. The relative cost effectiveness of water fluoridation across communities: analysis of variations according to underlying caries levels. Community Dent Health. 1990;7(1):3–10.PubMed
22.
go back to reference O’Connell J, Rockell J, Ouellet J, Tomar SL, Maas W. Costs and savings associated with community water fluoridation in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(12):2224–32.CrossRef O’Connell J, Rockell J, Ouellet J, Tomar SL, Maas W. Costs and savings associated with community water fluoridation in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(12):2224–32.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference O’Connell J, Brunson D, Anselmo T, Sullivan P. Costs and savings associated with community water fluoridation programs in Colorado. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2(Special Issue): A06. O’Connell J, Brunson D, Anselmo T, Sullivan P. Costs and savings associated with community water fluoridation programs in Colorado. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2(Special Issue): A06.
24.
go back to reference Griffin SO, Jones K, Tomar SL. An economic evaluation of community water fluoridation. J Public Health Dent. 2001;61(2):78–86.CrossRef Griffin SO, Jones K, Tomar SL. An economic evaluation of community water fluoridation. J Public Health Dent. 2001;61(2):78–86.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tchouaket E, Brousselle A, Fansi A, Dionne PA, Bertrand E, Fortin C. The economic value of Quebec’s water fluoridation program. J Public Health. 2013;21(6):523–33.CrossRef Tchouaket E, Brousselle A, Fansi A, Dionne PA, Bertrand E, Fortin C. The economic value of Quebec’s water fluoridation program. J Public Health. 2013;21(6):523–33.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cobiac LJ, Vos T. Cost-effectiveness of extending the coverage of water supply fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries in Australia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012;40(4):369–76.CrossRef Cobiac LJ, Vos T. Cost-effectiveness of extending the coverage of water supply fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries in Australia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012;40(4):369–76.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ciketic S, Hayatbakhsh MR, Doran CM. Drinking water fluoridation in South East Queensland: a cost-effectiveness evaluation. Health Promot J Austr. 2010;21(1):51–6.CrossRef Ciketic S, Hayatbakhsh MR, Doran CM. Drinking water fluoridation in South East Queensland: a cost-effectiveness evaluation. Health Promot J Austr. 2010;21(1):51–6.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Campain AC, Marino RJ, Wright FAC, Harrison D, Bailey DL, Morgan MV. The impact of changing dental needs on cost savings from fluoridation. Aust Dent J. 2010;55(1):37–44.CrossRef Campain AC, Marino RJ, Wright FAC, Harrison D, Bailey DL, Morgan MV. The impact of changing dental needs on cost savings from fluoridation. Aust Dent J. 2010;55(1):37–44.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wright JC, Bates MN, Cutress T, Lee M. The cost-effectiveness of fluoridating water supplies in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(2):170–8.CrossRef Wright JC, Bates MN, Cutress T, Lee M. The cost-effectiveness of fluoridating water supplies in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(2):170–8.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
36.
go back to reference Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(2):231–50.CrossRef Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(2):231–50.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
42.
go back to reference Glied S, Neidell M. The economic value of teeth. J Hum Resour. 2010;45(2):468–96. Glied S, Neidell M. The economic value of teeth. J Hum Resour. 2010;45(2):468–96.
45.
go back to reference Office of the Attorney General. European Union (Mercury) Regulations 2018. Regulation (EU) 2017/852 2018. Office of the Attorney General. European Union (Mercury) Regulations 2018. Regulation (EU) 2017/852 2018.
47.
go back to reference Burke F, Lucarotti P. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 2: Amalgam restorations–time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth. Br Dent J. 2018;224(10):789–800. Burke F, Lucarotti P. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 2: Amalgam restorations–time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth. Br Dent J. 2018;224(10):789–800.
48.
go back to reference Burke F, Lucarotti P. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 4: resin composite restorations: time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth. Br Dent J. 2018;224(12):945–56. Burke F, Lucarotti P. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 4: resin composite restorations: time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth. Br Dent J. 2018;224(12):945–56.
53.
go back to reference Ran T, Chattopadhyay SK, Force CPST. Economic evaluation of community water fluoridation: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(6):790–6.CrossRef Ran T, Chattopadhyay SK, Force CPST. Economic evaluation of community water fluoridation: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(6):790–6.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Ko L, Thiessen KM. A critique of recent economic evaluations of community water fluoridation. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2015;21(2):91–120.CrossRef Ko L, Thiessen KM. A critique of recent economic evaluations of community water fluoridation. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2015;21(2):91–120.CrossRef
55.
56.
go back to reference Birch S. The identification of supplier-inducement in a fixed price system of health care provision: the case of dentistry in the United Kingdom. J Health Econ. 1988;7(2):129–50.CrossRef Birch S. The identification of supplier-inducement in a fixed price system of health care provision: the case of dentistry in the United Kingdom. J Health Econ. 1988;7(2):129–50.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A cost-effectiveness analysis of community water fluoridation for schoolchildren
Authors
Jodi Cronin
Stephen Moore
Máiréad Harding
Helen Whelton
Noel Woods
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01490-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Oral Health 1/2021 Go to the issue